Abstract
In his recent book Lack of Character, Jon Doris argues that people typically lack character (understood in a particular way). Such a claim, if correct, would have devastating implications for moral philosophy and for various human moral projects (e.g. character development). I seek to defend character against Doris's challenging attack. To accomplish this, I draw on Socrates, Aristotle, and Kant to identify some of the central components of virtuous character. Next, I examine in detail some of the central experiments in social psychology upon which Doris's argument is based. I argue that, properly understood, such experiments reveal differences in the characters of their subjects, not that their subjects lack character altogether. I conclude with some reflections on the significance of such experiments and the importance of character.
References
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, C. Rowe (trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Blass, T., Understanding Behavior in the Milgram Obedience Experiment: The Role of Personality, Situations, and Their Interactions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (1991), pp. 398–413.
Conrad, J., Heart of Darkness. New York: Penguin Books, 1999.
Darley, J.M. and Batson, C.D., From Jerusalem to Jericho: A Study of Situational and Dispositional Variables in Helping Behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27 (1973), pp. 100–108.
Doris, J., Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Flanagan, O., Varieties of Moral Personality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1991.
Goldie, P., On Personality. New York: Routledge, 2004.
Harman, G., Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1999), pp. 315–332.
Harman, G., The Nonexistence of Character Traits, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (2000), pp. 223–226.
Hartshorne, H. and May, M.A., Studies in the Nature of Character I: Studies in Deceit. New York: Macmillan, 1928.
Kamtekar, R., Situationism and Virtue Ethics on the Content of Our Character, Ethics 114 (2004), pp. 458–491.
Kant, I., Critique of Practical Reason, M. Gregor (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Kant, I., Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, 3rd edition, J.W. Ellington (trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993.
Kant, I., Lectures on Ethics, L. Infield (trans.). Indianapolis, Hackett: 1930.
Kant, I., The Metaphysics of Morals, M. Gregor (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Kohlberg, L., Essays on Moral Development Volume II: The Psychology of Moral Development. New York: Harper & Row, 1984.
Kupperman, J., The Indispensability of Character, Philosophy 76 (2001), pp. 239–250.
Lewis, C.S., Mere Christianity. New York: HarperCollins, 2001.
Milgram, S., Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.
Miller, C., Social Psychology and Virtue Ethics, The Journal of Ethics 7 (2003), pp. 365–392.
Mischel, W., Personality and Assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1968.
Montmarquet, J., Moral Character and Social Science Research, Philosophy 78 (2003), pp. 355–368.
Nisbett, R.E. and Wilson, T.D., Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes, Psychological Review 84 (1977), pp. 231–259.
Nisbett, R. and Ross, L., Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
Penner, T., Socrates and the Early Dialogues, in R. Kraut (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–169.
Plato, Laches, and Charmides, R.K. Sprague (trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.
Sabini, J. and Silver, M., Lack of Character? Situationism Critiqued, Ethics 115 (2005), pp. 535–562.
Sreenivasan, G., Errors about Errors: Virtue Theory and Trait Attribution, Mind 111 (2002), pp. 47–68.
Vranas, P., The Indeterminacy Paradox: Character Evaluations and Human Psychology, NOUS 39(1) (2005), pp. 1–42.
Wielenberg, E., Value and Virtue in a Godless Universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Zimbardo, P., Quiet Rage: The Stanford Prison Study (video). Academic distribution by Stanford University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wielenberg, E.J. Saving Character. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 9, 461–491 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-006-9010-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-006-9010-1