Skip to main content
Log in

A (not-so-radical) solution to the species problem

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What are species? One popular answer is that species are individuals. Here I develop another approach to thinking about species, an approach based on the notion of a lineage. A lineage is a sequence of reproducing entities, individuated in terms of its components. I argue that one can conceive of species as groups of lineages, either organism lineages or population lineages. Conceiving of species as groups of lineages resolves the problems that the individual conception of species is supposed to resolve. It has added the virtue of focusing attention on the characteristic of species that is most relevant to understanding their role in evolutionary processes, namely, the lineage structure of species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buss, L.W.: 1987,The Evolution of Individuality, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1982,The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.R. and Raven, P.H.: 1969, ‘Differentiation of Populations’,Science 165, 1228–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N.: 1985,Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ereshefsky, M.: 1991, ‘Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution’,Philosophy of Science 58, 84–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.T.: 1974, ‘A Radical Solution to the Species Problem’,Systematic Zoology 23, 536–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.T.: 1987, ‘Species Concepts, Individuality, and Objectivity’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 127–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R.E.: 1978, ‘A Species Definition’,International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 28, 605–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger, K.E.: 1987, ‘Discussion: Pluralism and Species Concepts, or When Must We Agree with One Another?’,Philosophy of Science 54, 480–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1976, ‘Are Species Really Individuals?’,Systematic Zoology 25, 174–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1978, ‘A Matter of Individuality’,Philosophy of Science 45, 335–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1980, ‘Individuality and Selection’,Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1981, ‘Units of Evolution: A Metaphysical Essay’, in R.N. Brandon and R.M. Burian (eds.),Genes, Organisms, Populations: Controversies over the Units of Selection, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 142–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1987 ‘Genealogical Actors in Ecological Roles’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 168–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1984, ‘Species’,Philosophy of Science 51, 308–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1987, ‘Ghostly Whispers: Mayr, Ghiselin, and the “Philosophers” on the Ontological Status of Species’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 184–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, B.D.: 1985, ‘The Morphological, Developmental, and Phylogenetic Basis of Species Concepts in Bryophytes’,Bryologist 88, 207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, B.D. and Brandon, R.N.: 1987, ‘Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 397–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, B.D. and Donoghue, M.J.: 1982, ‘Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism’,Systematic Zoology 31, 491–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1988,Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.: 1989,The Structure of Biological Theory, SUNY-Albany Press, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L.M.: 1976, ‘Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks’,Taxon 25, 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E.O.: 1978, ‘The Evolutionary Species Concept Reconsidered’,Systematic Zoology 27, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, M.: 1990, ‘A Commentary on Ridley's Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem’,Biology and Philosophy 5, 433–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M.B.: 1970, ‘Deducing the Consequences of Evolution’,Journal of Theoretical Biology 29, 343–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M.B.: 1985, ‘Species are Individuals: Theoretical Foundations for the Claim’,Philosophy of Science 52, 578–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B.E.: 1991, ‘Are Species Sets?’,Biology and Philosophy 6, 413–431.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, B.E. A (not-so-radical) solution to the species problem. Biol Philos 10, 339–356 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00852472

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00852472

Key words

Navigation