Abstract
In this paper I assess the prospects for combining contemporary Everettian quantum mechanics (EQM) with branching-time semantics in the tradition of Kripke, Prior, Thomason and Belnap. I begin by outlining the salient features of ‘decoherence-based’ EQM, and of the ‘consistent histories’ formalism that is particularly apt for conceptual discussions in EQM. This formalism permits of both ‘branching worlds’ and ‘parallel worlds’ interpretations; the metaphysics of EQM is in this sense underdetermined by the physics. A prominent argument due to Lewis (On the Plurality of Worlds, 1986) supports the non-branching interpretation. Belnap et al. (Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterministic World, 2001) refer to Lewis’ argument as the ‘Assertion problem’, and propose a pragmatic response to it. I argue that their response is unattractively ad hoc and complex, and that it prevents an Everettian who adopts branching-time semantics from making clear sense of objective probability. The upshot is that Everettians are better off without branching-time semantics. I conclude by discussing and rejecting an alternative possible motivation for branching time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacciagaluppi G. (2002) Remarks on space–time and locality in Everett’s interpretation’. In Modality, probability, and Bell’s theorems. NATO Science Series.. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Belnap N., Müller T. (2010) Branching with uncertain semantics. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 61(3): 681–696
Belnap N., Perloff M., Xu M. (2001) Facing the future: Agents and choices in our indeterministic world. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bigelow J. (1988) The reality of numbers. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Churchland P. (1981) Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 78: 67–90
Deutsch D. (1985) Quantum theory as a universal physical theory. International Journal for Theoretical Physics 24: 1–41
Everett III, H. (1955). Wave mechanics without probability. Draft of Princeton Doctoral Dissertation.
Gell-Mann M., Hartle J. (1990) Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology. In: Zurek W. (eds) Complexity, entropy and the physics of information. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA
Greaves H. (2004) Understanding Deutsch’s probability in a deterministic universe. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35(3): 423–456
Greaves H. (2007) Probability in the Everett interpretation. Philosophy Compass 2(1): 109–128
Hawthorne J. (2002) Causal structuralism. Philosophical Perspectives 15: 361–378
Lewis D. (1973) Counterfactuals. Blackwell, Oxford
Lewis D. (1986) On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell, Oxford
Loewer B. (1996) Comment on Lockwood. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47(2): 229–232
Müller T. (2005) Probability theory and causation: A branching space–times analysis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56: 487–520
Nolan D. (1997) Quantitative parsimony. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 48: 329–343
Price H. (2010) Decisions, decisions, decisions: Can Savage salvage Everettian probability?. In: Saunders S., Barrett J., Kent A., Wallace D. (eds) Many worlds? Everett, quantum theory, and reality.. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Saunders S. (1993) Decoherence, relative states, and evolutionary adaptation. Foundations of Physics 23: 1553–1585
Saunders S. (1995) Time, quantum mechanics, and decoherence. Synthese 102(2): 235–266
Saunders S. (1998) Time, quantum mechanics, and probability. Synthese 114(3): 373–404
Saunders S. (2010) Chance in the Everett interpretation. In: Saunders S., Barrett J., Kent A., Wallace D. (eds) Many worlds? Everett, quantum theory, and reality.. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Saunders S., Wallace D. (2008) Branching and uncertainty. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 59(3): 293–305
Wallace, D. (2005). Language use in a branching universe. Online, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2554/.
Wallace D. (2010) Decoherence and ontology. In: Saunders S., Barrett J., Kent A., Wallace D. (eds) Many worlds? Everett, quantum theory, and reality.. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Wallace D. (2012) The emergent multiverse: Quantum theory according to the Everett interpretation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Weiner M., Belnap N. (2006) How causal probabilities might fit into our objectively indeterministic world. Synthese 149: 1–36
Wilson A. (2010) Macroscopic ontology in Everettian quantum mechanics. Philosophical Quarterly 61(243): 363–382
Wilson, A. (forthcoming). Objective probability in Everettian quantum mechanics. British Journal for Philosophy of Science, To appear.
Zurek, W. (2003). Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical—REVISITED. Online, http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0306072.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, A. Everettian quantum mechanics without branching time. Synthese 188, 67–84 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0048-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0048-9