Skip to main content
Log in

Propositional knowledge and know-how

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is roughly in two parts. The first deals with whether know-how is constituted by propositional knowledge, as discussed primarily by Gilbert Ryle (1949) The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson, Jason Stanley and Timothy Williamson (2001). Knowing how. Journal of Philosophy, 98, pp. 411–444 as well as Stephen Hetherington (2006). How to know that knowledge-that is knowledge-how. In S. Hetherington (Ed.) Epistemology futures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. The conclusion of this first part is that know-how sometimes does and sometimes does not consist in propositional knowledge. The second part defends an analysis of know-how inspired by Katherine Hawley’ (2003). Success and knowledge-how. American Philosophical Quarterly, 40, pp. 19–31, insightful proposal that know-how requires counterfactual success. I conclude by showing how this analysis helps to explain why know-how sometimes does and sometimes does not consist of propositional knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davidson Donald (1963). Actions, reasons and causes. Journal of Philosophy 60, 685–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr David (1979). The logic of knowing how and ability. Mind 88, 394–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geach Peter (1957). Mental acts. London, R.K.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson Frank (1982). Epiphenomenal qualia. Philosophical Quarterly 32, 127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson Frank (1986). What Mary didn’t know. Journal of Philosophy 83, 291–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley Katherine (2003). Success and knowledge-how. American Philosophical Quarterly 40, 19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, Stephen. (2006). How to know that knowledge-that is knowledge-how. In S. Hetherington (Ed.) Epistemology futures, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Horsey Richard (2002). The art of chicken sexing. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14, 107–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Koethe John (2001). Stanley and Williamson on knowing how. Journal of Philosophy 99, 325–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. (1983). Postscript to mad pain and martian pain. Philosophical Papers Volume 1, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Lewis, David. (1990). What experience teaches. In W. Lycan (Ed.), Mind and cognition: A reader, Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Ryle Gilbert (1949). The concept of mind. London, Hutchinson

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle John (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley Jason, Williamson Timothy. (2001). Knowing how. Journal of Philosophy 98, 411–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, Georg Henrik (1963). Norm and action. A logical enquiry. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziff Paul. (1984). Epistemic analysis. Boston, Reidel

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John N Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, J.N. Propositional knowledge and know-how. Synthese 165, 107–125 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9242-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9242-1

Keywords

Navigation