Skip to main content
Log in

Same-Sex Marriage and Equality

  • Published:
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some argue that same-sex marriage is not an equal rights issue because, where same-sex marriage is illegal, heterosexuals and homosexuals have the exact same right to marry—i.e., the right to marry one adult of the opposite sex. I dispute this argument by pointing out that while societies that prohibit same-sex marriage equally permit individual heterosexuals and homosexuals to marry one adult of the opposite sex, same-sex couples in such societies are denied an important right that opposite-sex couples enjoy—i.e., the right to marry. I argue that the right to marry is fundamentally, not an individual right, but a couple’s collective right, analogous to assembly rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Wall (2007) provides another recent discussion of collective rights.

  2. Jovanvic (2010) interestingly construes the right to assemble as an individual right.

References

  • Buchanan A (1994) Liberalism and group rights. In: Coleman JL, Buchanan A (eds) In Harm’s way—essays in honour of Joel Feinberg. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg J (1980) The nature and value of rights. J Value Inq 4:263–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett J (2009a) Marriage unhitched from the state: a defense. Public Aff Q 23(2):161–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett J (2009b) Public reasons for private vows: a response to Gilboa. Public Aff Q 23(3):261–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanvic M (2010) Are there universal collective rights? Hum Rights Rev 11(1):17–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazar S (2009) The nature and disvalue of injury. Res Publica 15(3):289–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leybold-Johnson I (2010) Switzerland needs to ‘catch up’ on gay adoption. Swiss news world wide, available at www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss_news/Switzerland_needs_to_catch_up_on_gay_adoption.html?cid=9128510

  • Margalit A, Raz J (1995) National self-determination. In: Kymlicka W (ed) The rights of minority cultures. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough R (2005) Is same-sex marriage an equal rights issue? Public Aff Q 19(1):51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr R (2005) The long arc of justice. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (1995) Personal rights and public space. Philos Public Aff 24(2):83–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroll A (2009) A defense of same-sex marriage. Public Aff Q 23(4):343–355

    Google Scholar 

  • The Case for Gay Marriage (2004) Economist 370:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall S (2007) Collective rights and individual autonomy. Ethics 117(2):234–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman CH (2005) Feinberg’s two concepts of rights. Leg Theory 11(3):213–226

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Marya Rafiq, a philosophy major at California State University, Bakersfield, for research assistance on this article, and to two very helpful anonymous referees for Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reginald Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, R. Same-Sex Marriage and Equality. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 14, 589–595 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-010-9261-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-010-9261-8

Keywords

Navigation