Abstract
Most people are familiar with Justice Stewart's now classic statement that while he cannot describe pornography, he certainly knows it when he sees it. We instantly identify with Justice Stewart. Pornography is not difficult to recognize, but it does elude description. This is because traditional attempts at description are attempts that seek to explain at either an abstract or empirical level rather than at the level that accounts for experience in its totality. Justice Stewart's lament represents the need to understand the subjective experience of pornography and cease trying to explain it in purely objective terms. Much feminist literature in general and Catharine MacKinnon's work in particular seeks to do just this. MacKinnon argues that pornography should not be explained in familiar First Amendment freedom-of-expression terms, but rather in terms of the actual sexual abuse it constitutes in experience. Then, and only then, are we able to select the appropriate legal remedy. This essay suggests that MacKinnon's position not only needs the support of a non-traditional philosophical approach, but has one readily available in the phenomenology of philosopher Edmund Husserl.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Edie, James M., Edmund Husserl's Phenomenology: A Critical Commentary, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
Fromm, Erich. The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method (1960), Second Revised Edition, Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall, trans. NY: Crossroads Publishing Company, 1989.
Griffin, Susan. Pornography and Silence: Culture's Revenge Against Nature. NY: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1981.
Husserl, Edmund. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, (1913) W.R. Boyce Gibson, trans. NY: Macmillan, 1931; Collier 1962.
Husserl, Edmund. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, David Carr, trans. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970.
Ihde, Don. Experimental Phenomenology, Albany: State University Of New York Press, 1986.
Kohák, Erazim. Idea and Experience: Edmund Husserl's Project of Phenomenology, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1978.
Leventhal, Harold. “An Empirical Inquiry into the Effects of Miller v. California on the Control of Obscenity”, New York University Law Review 810 (1977): 52.
Edward Levi's An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1949.
Llewellyn, Karl N. The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Cases on Appeal. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1960.
MacKinnon, Catharine. Sexual Harassment of Working Women. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.
MacKinnon, Catharine. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.
MacKinnon, Catharine. Toward a Feminist Theory of The State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.
MacKinnon, Catharine. Only Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Natanson, Maurice. Edmund Husserl: Philosopher of Infinite Tasks, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WILLIS, C.E. THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF PORNOGRAPHY. Law and Philosophy 16, 177–199 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005726012007
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005726012007