Skip to main content
Log in

THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF PORNOGRAPHY

  • Published:
Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most people are familiar with Justice Stewart's now classic statement that while he cannot describe pornography, he certainly knows it when he sees it. We instantly identify with Justice Stewart. Pornography is not difficult to recognize, but it does elude description. This is because traditional attempts at description are attempts that seek to explain at either an abstract or empirical level rather than at the level that accounts for experience in its totality. Justice Stewart's lament represents the need to understand the subjective experience of pornography and cease trying to explain it in purely objective terms. Much feminist literature in general and Catharine MacKinnon's work in particular seeks to do just this. MacKinnon argues that pornography should not be explained in familiar First Amendment freedom-of-expression terms, but rather in terms of the actual sexual abuse it constitutes in experience. Then, and only then, are we able to select the appropriate legal remedy. This essay suggests that MacKinnon's position not only needs the support of a non-traditional philosophical approach, but has one readily available in the phenomenology of philosopher Edmund Husserl.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Edie, James M., Edmund Husserl's Phenomenology: A Critical Commentary, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, Erich. The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method (1960), Second Revised Edition, Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall, trans. NY: Crossroads Publishing Company, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Susan. Pornography and Silence: Culture's Revenge Against Nature. NY: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, (1913) W.R. Boyce Gibson, trans. NY: Macmillan, 1931; Collier 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, David Carr, trans. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, Don. Experimental Phenomenology, Albany: State University Of New York Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohák, Erazim. Idea and Experience: Edmund Husserl's Project of Phenomenology, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, Harold. “An Empirical Inquiry into the Effects of Miller v. California on the Control of Obscenity”, New York University Law Review 810 (1977): 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward Levi's An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, Karl N. The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Cases on Appeal. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Catharine. Sexual Harassment of Working Women. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Catharine. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Catharine. Toward a Feminist Theory of The State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Catharine. Only Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natanson, Maurice. Edmund Husserl: Philosopher of Infinite Tasks, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WILLIS, C.E. THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF PORNOGRAPHY. Law and Philosophy 16, 177–199 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005726012007

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005726012007

Keywords

Navigation