Abstract
The current widespread belief that taxonomic methods used before Darwin were essentialist is ill-founded. The essentialist method developed by followers of Plato and Aristotle required definitions to state properties that are always present. Polythetic groups do not obey that requirement, whatever may have been the ontological beliefs of the taxonomist recognizing such groups. Two distinct methods of forming higher taxa, by chaining and by examplar, were widely used in the period between Linnaeus and Darwin, and both generated polythetic groups. Philosopher William Whewell congratulated pre-Darwinian taxonomists for not adhering to the rigid ideal of definition used in the mathematical sciences. What he called the “method of types” is here called the “method of exemplars” because typology has been equated with essentialism, whereas the use of a type species as the reference point or prototype for a higher category was a practice inconsistent with essentialism. The story that the essentialism of philosophers dominated the development of systematics may prove to be a myth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adanson M. 1763–64. Familles des plantes. Wheldon & Wesley facsimile, 1966.
Amundson R. 1998. ‘Typology Reconsidered: Two Doctrines on the History of Evolutionary Biology’. Biology and Philosophy 13: 153–177.
Atran S. 1990. Conceptual Foundations of Natural History: Towards an Anthropology of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Beckner M. 1959. The Biological Way of Thought. Columbia University Press, New York.
Boyd R. 1999. ‘Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa’. In: Wilson R.A. (ed.), Species: New Interdiscipliary Essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 141–185.
Cain A.J. 1958. ‘Logic and Memory in Linnaeus's System of Taxonomy’ Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London. 169:, pp. 144–163.
Cain A.J. 1959. ‘Deductive and Inductive Methods in Post-Linnaean Taxonomy’ Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London. 170:, pp. 185–217.
Cain A.J. 1995. ‘Linnaeus's Natural and Artificial Arrangements of Plants’. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society of London 117: 73–133.
Camardi G. 2001. ‘Richard Owen, Morphology, and Evolution’. Journal of the History of Biology 34: 481–515.
Cuvier G. 1828. Historical Portrait of the Progress of Ichthyology, from its Origins to Our Own Time (ed. T.W. Pietsch, transl. A.J. Simpson, 1995). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Darwin C.R. 1859. On the Origin of Species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, (facsimile) 1964
De Candolle A.P. 1813. Theorie elementaire de la botanique. Paris.
Eigen E. 1997. ‘Overcoming First Impressions: Georges Cuvier's Types’. Journal of the History of Biology 30: 179–209.
Ereshefsky M. 2001. The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Farber P.L. 1976. ‘The Type Concept in Zoology in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century’. Journal of the History of Biology 9: 93–119.
Greene J.C. 1992. ‘From Aristotle to Darwin: Reflections on Ernst Mayr's Interpretation in The Growth of Biological Thought’. Journal of the History of Biology 25: 257–284.
Hacking I. 1975. Why Does Language Matter to Philosophers? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hull D.L. 1965. ‘The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy – Two Thousand Years of Stasis’. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 15: 314–326. 16: 1–8.
Hull D.L. 1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lakoff G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Larson J.L. 1971. Reason and Experience. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Linnaeus C. 1753. Species Plantarum. Ray Society, London, (facsimile) 1957–1959.
Mayr E. 1959. ‘Darwin and the Evolutionary Theory in Biology’. In: Evolution and Anthropology: A Centennial Appraisal. Anthropological Society of Washington, Washington, DC, USA (excerpt reprinted in Mayr 1976: 26–29). pp. 1–10.
Mayr E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Mayr E. 1964. ‘Introduction’. In: Darwin C., On the Origin of Species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (facsimile). pp. vii–xxvii.
Mayr E. 1968. ‘Theory of Biological Classification’. Nature 220 (reprinted in Mayr (1969): 425–432): 545–548.
Mayr E. 1969. ‘The Biological Meaning of Species’. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 1 (reprinted in Mayr 1976: 515–525): 311–320.
Mayr E. 1976. Evolution and the Diversity of Life: Selected Essays. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
Mayr E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
McOuat G.R. 1996. ‘Species, Rules and Meaning: The Politics of Language and the Ends of Definitions in 19th Century Natural History’. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 27: 473–519.
Mirbel C.-F.B. 1815. Elements de physiologie végétal. Paris.
Muller-Wille S. 1999. Botanik und Weltweiter Handel: Zur Begründung eines Natürlichen Systems der Pflanzen durch Carl von Linné (1707– 1778). Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung, Berlin.
Müller-Wille S. 2001. ‘Gardens of Paradise’. Endeavour 25: 49–54.
Panchen A.L. 1992. Classification, Evolution, and the Nature of Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Pennell F.W. 1939. ‘On the typification of the Linnean species as illustrated by Polygala verticillata’. Rhodora 41: 378–384.
Popper K. 1944. ‘The Poverty of Historicism I’. Economica 11: 86–103.
Popper E. 1950. The Open Society and its Enemies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Pratt V. 1981. ‘Aristotle and the Essence of Natural History’. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 3: 203–223.
Pratt V. 1985. ‘System-Building in the Eighteenth Century’. In: North J.D. and Roche J.J. (eds), The Light of Nature. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 421–431.
Russell J.B. 1991. Inventing the Flat Earth. Praeger, New York.
Sneath P.H.A. 1962. ‘The Construction of Taxonomic Groups’. In: Ainsworth G.C. and Sneath P.H.A. eds), Microbial Classification. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp. 289–332.
Sober E. 1980. ‘Evolution, Population Thinking and Essentialism’. Philosophy of Science 47: 350–383.
Sokal R.R. 1962. ‘Typology and Empiricism in Taxonomy’. Journal of Theoretical Biology 3: 230–267.
Sokal R.R and Sneath P.H.A. 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
Stearn W. 1957. ‘An Introduction to the Species Plantarum and Cognate Botanical Works of Carl Linnaeus’. In: Linnaeus 1753 Vol. 1. 1–176., pp. v–xiv.
Stearn W. 1959. ‘Four Supplementary Linnaean Publications’. In: Linnaeus 1753 Vol. 2., pp. 73–102.
Stevens P.F. 1984. ‘Metaphors and Typology in the Development of Botanical Systematics 1690–1960, or the Art of Putting New Wine in Old Bottles’. Taxon 33: 169–211.
Stevens P.F. 1994. The Development of Biological Systematics: Antoine-Laurent de Jussieu, Nature, and the Natural System. Columbia University Press, New York.
Stevens P.F. 1997. ‘How to Interpret Botanical Classifications – Suggestions from History’. BioScience 47: 243–250.
Taylor J.R. 1995. Linguistic Categorization. 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Thompson P. 2001. ‘“Organization,” “Population,” and Mayr's Rejection of Essentialism in Biology’. In: Sfendoni-Mentzou D., Hattiangadi J. and Johnson D.M. (eds), Aristotle and Contemporary Science Vol. 2. Peter Lang, New York, pp. 173–183.
Van der Hammen L. 1981. ‘Type-Concept, Higher Classification and Evolution’. Acta Biotheoretica 30: 3–48.
Whewell W. 1847. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences Founded upon their History. 2nd edn. Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York, facsimile, 1967.
Winsor M.P. 1976. ‘The Development of Linnaean Insect Classification’. Taxon 25: 57–67.
Winsor M.P. 1979. ‘Louis Agassiz and the Species Question’. Studies in History of Biology 3: 89–117.
Winsor M.P. 1991. Reading the Shape of Nature: Comparative Zoology at the Agassiz Museum. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Winsor M.P. 2001. ‘Cain on Linnaeus: The Scientist-historian as Unanalysed Entity’. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences 32: 239–254.
Winsor M.P. 2003. ‘Setting Up Milestones: Sneath on Adanson and Mayr on Darwin’. In: Williams D.M. and Forey P.L. (eds), Milestones in Systematics, Systematics Association Special Vol. 68. Taylor and Francis, London (in press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winsor, M.P. Non-essentialist methods in pre-Darwinian taxonomy. Biology & Philosophy 18, 387–400 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024139523966
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024139523966