Skip to main content
Log in

Propositional Q-Logic

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Topic of the paper is Q-logic – a logic of agency in its temporal and modal context. Q-logic may be considered as a basal logic of agency since the most important stit-operators discussed in the literature can be defined or axiomatized easily within its semantical and syntactical framework. Its basic agent dependent operator, the Q-operator (also known as Δ- or cstit-operator), which has been discussed independently by F. v. Kutschera and B. F. Chellas, is investigated here in respect of its relation to other temporal and modal operators. The main result of the paper, then, is a completeness result for a calculus of Q-logic with respect to a semantics defined on the tree-approach to agency as introduced and developed by, among others, F. v. Kutschera and N. D. Belnap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Belnap, N. D.: 1991a, Backwards and forwards in the modal logic of agency, Philos. Phenomen. Res. 51, 777-807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. D.: 1991b, Before refraining: Concepts for agency, Erkenntnis 34, 137-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. D. and Perloff, M.: 1990, Seeing to it that: A canonical form for agentives, in H. E. Kyburg, Jr., R. P. Loui, and G. N. Carlson (eds.), Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 175-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. D. and Perloff, M.: 1992, The way of the agent, Studia Logica 51, 463-484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. D., Perloff, M. and Xu, M.: 2001, Facing the Future: Agents and their Choices in our Indeterminist World, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chellas, B. F.: 1992, Time and modality in the logic of agency, Studia Logica 51, 485-517.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rijke, M.: 1992, The modal logic of inequality, J. Symbolic Logic 57(2), 566-584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D. M., Hodkinson, I. and Reynolds M.: 1994, Temporal Logic: Mathematical Foundations and Computational Aspects, Vol. I, Oxford Logic Guides 28, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargov, G. and Goranko, V.: 1993, Modal logic with names, J. Philos. Logic 22, 607-636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horty, J. F.: 2001, Agency and Deontic Logic, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Horty, J. F. and Belnap, N. D.: 1995, The deliberative stit: A study of action, omission, ability, and obligation, J. Philos. Logic 24, 583-644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera, F. v.: 1986, Bewirken, Erkenntnis 24, 253-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera, F. v.: 1997, T × W-completeness, J. Philos. Logic 26, 241-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maio, M. C. D. and Zanardo, A.: 1994, Synchronized histories in Prior-Thomason representation of branching time, in D. M. Gabbay and H. J. Ohlbach (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Temporal Logic, ICTL '94, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 827, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 265-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maio, M. C. D. and Zanardo, A.: 1998, A Gabbay-rule free axiomatization of T×W validity, J. Philos. Logic 27, 435-487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M.: 2001, An axiomatization of full computation tree logic, J. Symbolic Logic 66(3), 1011-1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R. H.: 1984, Combinations of tense and modality, in D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic: Extensions of Classical Logic, Vol. II, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 135-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wölfl, S.: 1999a, Combinations of tense and modality for predicate logic, J. Philos. Logic 28, 371-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wölfl, S.: 1999b, Kombinierte Zeit-und Modallogik: Vollständigkeitsresultate für prädikatenlogische Sprachen, Logische Philosophie 5, Logos Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, M.: 1994a, Decidability of stit theory with a single agent and refref equivalence, Studia Logica 53(2), 259-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, M.: 1994b, Decidability of deliberative stit theories with multiple agents, in D. M. Gabbay and H. J. Ohlbach (eds.), Temporal Logic, Springer, Berlin, pp. 332-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, M.: 1994c, Doing and refraining from refraining, J. Philos. Logic 23(6), 621-632.

    Google Scholar 

  • WÖLFL Xu, M.: 1995a, Busy choice sequences, refraining formulas, and modalities, Studia Logica 54(3), 267-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, M.: 1995b, On the basic logic of stit with a single agent, J. Symbolic Logic 60(2), 459-483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, M.: 1998, Axioms for deliberative stit, J. Philos. Logic 27(5), 505-552.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wölfl, S. Propositional Q-Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31, 387–414 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020163602542

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020163602542

Navigation