Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic Interactions of Agency in Leadership (DIAL): An Integrative Framework for Analysing Agency in Sustainability Leadership

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates agency as a way of being and acting in sustainability leadership. Our primary aim is to enhance understanding of agentic strategies that facilitate transcending systemic complexities in sustainability leadership. We make a distinction in our analytical approach by drawing from Emirbayer and Mische’s (Am J Sociol 103:41, 1998) conceptualisation of agency as ‘an interactive process of reflexive transformation and relational pragmatics, a temporally embedded process of social engagement, informed by the past, oriented towards the future and enacted in the present’ (p. 963). We add ontological sources of agency to these dynamics which interact with habit, imagination, judgement and learning in the transformation of social systems. This approach underpins our model ‘Dynamic Interactions of Agency in Leadership’ (DIAL), an integrative framework for analysing agency in sustainability leadership. We examine the efficacy of our framework in higher education initiatives in which sustainability aspirations, aims and actions are envisioned, articulated and mobilised. We conclude by offering further avenues of research in sustainability leadership designed to advance this burgeoning field and contribute to bridging the gap between sustainability challenges and our abilities to solve them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, K. E., Stelzner, S. P., & Wielkiewicz, R. M. (1999). The ecology of leadership: Adapting to the challenges of a changing world. Journal of Leadership and Organisation Studies, 5, 62. doi:10.1177/107179199900500207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2010). Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in U.S. business organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 528–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASSHE. (2012). About ASSHE. Retrieved February 22, 2012 from http://www.aashe.org/about.

  • Australian Campuses Towards Sustainability (ACTS). (2013). Retrieved August 6, 2013 from http://www.acts.asn.au/.

  • Avery, G. (2005). Leadership for sustainable futures: Achieving success in a competitive world. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory building. American Psychologist, 62(1), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise in human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional and transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2), 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. (2000). The future of leadership in learning organisations. Journal of Leadership and Organisation Studies, 7, 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernisation: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in modern social order. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems, building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2006). How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement. School of Education and Lifelong Learning, The University of Exeter, UK.

  • Boiral, O., Cayer, M., & Baron, C. M. (2008). The action logics of environmental leadership: A developmental perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 479–499. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9784-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R., Hawken, B., Gosling, J., & Taylor, S. (2011). Exploring leadership, individual, organizational & societal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2008). Distributed leadership in higher education; rhetoric and reality. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37, 257–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cajete, G. (2000). Native Science, natural laws of interdependence. New Mexico: Clear Light Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, P. B., & Wals, A. E. J. (Eds.). (2004). Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: Problematics, promise, and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortese, A. (2010). Learning and thriving in higher education. San Francisco: Bioneers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2010). Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuilla, J. (2005). The state of leadership ethics and the work that lies before us. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(4), 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dent, E. B., Higgins, E. M., & Wharff, D. M. (2005). Spirituality and leadership: An empirical review of definitions, distinctions, and embedded assumptions. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 625–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drath, W. H., Cauley, C. D., Palus, C. J., Van Velsor, E., O’Connor, P., & McGuire, J. B. (2008). Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 635–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., & Van Lierre, K. D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egri, C. P., & Frost, P. J. (1994). Leadership for environmental and social change. Leadership Quarterly, 5(3–4), 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egri, C., & Herman, S. (2000). Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles and contexts of environmental leaders and there organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 571–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbeiss, S. A. (2012). Re-thinking ethical leadership: An interdisciplinary integrative approach. Leadership Quarterly, 23, 791–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdig, M. A. (2007). Sustainability leadership: Co-creating a sustainable future. Journal of Change Management, 7(1), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-Balas, D., Adachi, J., Banas, S., Davidson, C. I., Hoshikoshi, A., Mishra, A., et al. (2008). An international comparative analysis of sustainability transformation across seven universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, I., & Hasnaoui, A. (2011). The meaning of corporate social responsibility: The vision of four nations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 419–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(2003), 693–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1996). Affluence, poverty and the idea of a post-scarcity society. Development and Change, 27(1996), 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K. (2007). Learning to lead: Can Aristotle help us find the road to wisdom? Leadership, 3(2), 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadorn, G. H., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmannd, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., & Harms, P. D. (2008). Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 669–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardman, G. J. (2009). Regenerative leadership: An integral theory for transforming people and organisation for sustainability in business, education and community, PhD, Florida Atlantic University, USA. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/306968/Regenerative_Leadership_Dissertation_2009_.

  • Harkavy, I. (2006). The role of universities in advancing citizenship and social justice in the 21st century. Education Citizenship and Social Justice, 1, 5. doi:10.1177/1746197906060711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harré, N. (2011). Psychology for a better world: Strategies to inspire sustainability. Auckland: The University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P. (1995). The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 184–200. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, B., & Reinelt, C. (2010). Social network analysis and the evaluation of leadership networks. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 600–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007 synthesis report: A report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC Secretariat. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_synthesis_report.htm.

  • Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption: A review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change (A report to the Sustainable Development Research Network). Surrey: Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalshoven, K., Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. B. (2011a). Ethical leader behavior and big five factors of personality. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 349–366. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0685-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalshoven, K., Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. B. (2011b). Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Leadership Quarterly, 2(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuruvilla, S., & Dorstewitz, P. (2010). There is no “point” in decision making: a model of transactive rationality for public policy and administration. Policy Science, 43, 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., et al. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(Suppl 1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, B. J., & Plowman, D. A. (2009). The leadership of emergence: A complex systems leadership theory of emergence at successive organizational levels. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef, M. (1995). Economic growth and quality of life: A threshold hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 15, 115–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef, M. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, B., & Biloslavo, R. (2011). Human flourishing as a foundation for a new sustainability oriented business school curriculum: Open questions and possible answers. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(5), 691–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, B., Rooney, D., & Boal, K. B. (2009). Wisdom principles as a meta-theoretical basis for evaluating leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D., Meadows, D., & Randers, J. (1992). Beyond the limits: Confronting global collapse, envisioning a sustainable future. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metclaf, L., & Benn, S. (2013). Sustainability leadership: An evolution of leadership ability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 369–384. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1278-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T., & Cordoba, J. (2009). Three views of systems theories and their implications for sustainability education. Journal of Management Education, 33, 323–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reave, L. (2005). Spiritual values and practices related to leadership effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 655–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M., Kleffner, A., & Bertels, S. (2011). Signalling sustainability leadership: Empirical evidence of the value of DJSI membership. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rundle-Thiele, S., & Wymer, W. (2010). Stand-alone ethics, social responsibility, and sustainability course requirements: A snapshot from Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Marketing Education, 32(1), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriberg, M. (2002). Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: Strengths, weaknesses and implications for practice and theory. Higher Education Policy, 15, 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (2004). Creating desired futures in a global economy. Reflections: The Society for Organizational Learning Journal, 5, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M., Smith, B., Kruschwitz, N., Laur, J., & Schely, S. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. E. (2006). Social paradigms and attutudes toward environmental accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 65, 121–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, C., Erakovic, L., Henare, M., & Pio, E. (2010). Relational well-being and wealth: Māori businesses and an ethic of care. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, C., Pio, E., Henare, M., & Erakovic, L. (2011). Wise up: Creating organizational wisdom through an ethic of kaitiakitanga. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(2), 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springett, D. (2010). Education for sustainability in the business studies curriculum: Ideological struggle. In P. Jones, D. Selby, & S. Sterling (Eds.), Sustainability education: Perspectives and practice across higher education (pp. 75–92). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cabinet Office, HM Treasury, Britain.

  • Tourish, D. (2012). The God that failed: Leadership and leaderism. Paper presented at the Evolution and Futures of Management Conference, St Anne’s College, Oxford University (March 26–28).

  • Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organising. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2010). Education for sustainable development (ESD). Retrieved October 21, 2011, from http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID=34756&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.

  • UNESCO. (n.d.). (2011). GHESP—Global Higher Education for Sustainability Partnership. Retrieved November 15, 2011, from http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID=34701&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.

  • United Nations Agenda 21. (2009). Retrieved January 6, 2012, from http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/.

  • United Nations Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). (2012) Promoting education, public awareness and training. Retrieved January 6, 2012, from http://www.unep.org/Documents.multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=52&ArticleID=4415&l=en.

  • University Leaders for a Sustainable Future. (2001). Advancing the movement: The higher education network for sustainability and the environment (HENSE). Retrieved February 22, 2012, from http://www.ulsf.org/pub_declaration_othvol33.html.

  • University Leaders for a Sustainable Future. (2012). Talloires Declaration Institutional Signatory List. Retrieved February 15, 2013, from http://www.ulsf.org/programs_talloires_signatories.html.

  • United Nations Global Compact. (2011). Retrieved April 12, 2013, from http://www.unglobalcompact.org/.

  • Universitas 21 Statement of Sustainability. (2009). Retrieved April 4, 2013, from http://www.universitas21.com.

  • University of Cambridge Programme for Sustainability Leadership. (2012). The future in practice: The state of sustainability leadership. Retrieved 13 April, 2013, from http://digital.edition-on.net/links/6431_the_future_in_practice_cpsl.asp.

  • Whittington, R. (1992). Putting giddens into action: Social systems and managerial agency. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Annual Report. (2012). Retrieved 13 April, 2013, from http://go.worldbank.org/VLWFADE5O0.

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2010). Vision 2050: The new agenda for business. Retrieved from http://www.wbcsd.org/web/projects/BZrole/Vision2050-FullReport_Final.pdf.

  • World Economic Forum. (2013). Retrieved 13 April, 2013, from www.weforum.org/.

  • World Wild Life Fund for Nature (WWF). (2008). Living planet report. Retrieved from http://www.wwf.org.nz/media_centre/publications/?4521/Living-Planet-Report-presentation-2008.

  • Wright, T. S. A. (2002). Definitions and frameworks for environmental sustainability in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 15(2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. S. A. (2004). The evolution of sustainability declarations in higher education. In P. B. Corcoran & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: Problematics, promise, and practice (pp. 7–19). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. S. A. (2009). Sustainability, internationalization, and higher education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 118(Summer), 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and International Business, University of Auckland Business School, 12 Grafton Road, Auckland CBD, New Zealand

    Rachel Wolfgramm & Sian Flynn-Coleman

  2. Department of Marketing, University of Auckland Business School, 12 Grafton Road, Auckland CBD, New Zealand

    Denise Conroy

Authors
  1. Rachel Wolfgramm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sian Flynn-Coleman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Denise Conroy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Wolfgramm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolfgramm, R., Flynn-Coleman, S. & Conroy, D. Dynamic Interactions of Agency in Leadership (DIAL): An Integrative Framework for Analysing Agency in Sustainability Leadership. J Bus Ethics 126, 649–662 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1977-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1977-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation