Abstract
In this paper, I will outline some of the important points made by Kripke and Putnam on the meaning of natural kind terms. Their notion of the baptism of natural kinds- the process by which kind terms are initially introduced into the language — is of special concern here. I argue that their accounts leave some ambiguities that suggest a baptism of objects and kinds that is free of additional theoretical commitments. Both authors suggest that we name the stuff and then let the scientists tell us what properties it really has, and hence what the real meaning is. I contend that such a barren baptism, taken at face value, cannot succeed in the semantic roles it has been assigned and that softening the stance on baptism suggests a more subtle and complex relation between reference and theoretical commitment than has emerged thus far.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Geach, P. T. (1956).Mental Acts, Their Content and Their Objects. London, Routledge & Paul.
Gupta, Anil. (1980).The Logic of Common Nouns: An Investigation in Quantified Modal Logic, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hempel, Carl and Paul Oppenheim. (1948). “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.”Philosophy of Science 15:567–79.
Kripke, Saul. (1972)Naming and Necessity. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell Pub.
Mellor, Hugh. (1977). “Natural Kinds.”British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 28:299–312
Putnam, Hilary, (1962) “It Ain’t Necessarily So.”Journal of Philosophy 59:658–71.
Putnam, Hilary, (1966). “The Analytic and Synthetic.” InMinn. Studies in the Philosophy of Science, V. VIII. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Putnam, Hilary, (1973). “Meaning and Reference.” InJournal of Philosophy 70:699–711.
Putnam, Hilary, (1975). “Is Semantics Possible?” InMind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–52.
Quine, W.V.O. (1969). “Natural Kinds.” InOntological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rorty, Richard. (1982). “Introduction.” InConsequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972–1980, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wolf, Michael P. (2002). “The Curious Role of Natural Kind Terms.”Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 83:81–101.
Wright, Crispin and Hale, Robert, eds. (1999).A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell Pub.