Skip to main content
Log in

On nonminimal coupling of the electromagnetic and gravitational fields: The astrophysical evidence for the Schuster-Blackett conjecture and its implications

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Schuster-Blackett (S-B) conjecture, which supposes the relationshipM/J=βG1/2/2c between the magnetic dipole moments (M) of celestial objects and their angular momenta (J), where G is the Newtonian constant of gravitation, c the speed of light, and β a dimensionless constant of order unity, is examined in the context of the evolution of pulsar gyromagnetic ratios. It is demonstrated that the evolution of pulsar gyromagnetic ratios is not consistent with the strong form of the S-B conjecture where β is taken to be a constant. The pulsar evidence, which shows evolution withM/J constant for individual short-period pulsars, however, does admit the validity of a weaker form of the S-B conjecture, where β is allowed to take on a range of values. It is also shown that the only conventional explanation of the origin of pulsar magnetic fields that produces evolution where the gyromagnetic ratio remains constant for individual pulsars which generates magnetic fields of sufficient strength, the thermally driven Hall-field-limited battery effect, may not convincingly account for the observed behavior of pulsars. A few of the implications of the S-B conjecture and the pulsar evidence are explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. J. Accioly and N. L. P. Pereira da Silva,Phys. Lett. A 118, 271 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. O. Barut and T. Gornitz,Found. Phys. 15, 433 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Pauli,Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 18, 305, 337 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. M. S. Blackett,Nature (London) 159, 658 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. A. Batakis,Class. Quant. Gravit. 3, L49 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Schmutzer,Found. Phys. 15, 553 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Faraday,Experimental Researches in Electricity (1850; reprinted by Dover, New York, 1965), 3, 161.

  8. A. Schuster,Proc. R. Inst. 13, 273 (1890–1892) andProc. Phys. Soc. London 24, 121 (1912).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. A. Wilson,Proc. R. Soc. London A 104, 451 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. F. G. Swann and A. Longacre,J. Franklin Inst. 206, 421 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. M. S. Blackett,Philos Trans. R. Soc. London A 245, 309 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. G. Bennettet al., Proc. R. Soc. London A 198, 39 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Papapetrou,Philos. Mag. 41, 399 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Luchak,Can. J. Phys. 29, 470 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S.-P. Sirag,Nature (London) 278, 535 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. de Sabbata and M. Gasperini,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 38, 93 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. F. Woodward,Astrophys. J. 225, 574 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. F. Woodward,Astrophys. J. 256, 617 (1982);316, 743 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. F. Woodward,Astrophys. J. 279, 803 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. W. Roxburgh,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 132, 201 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. R. Pandharipandeet al., Astrophys. J. 208, 550 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Narayan,Astrophys. J. 319, 162 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. M. Stollman,Astron. Astrophys. 178, 143 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  24. B. Anderson and A. G. Lyne,Nature (London) 303, 597 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. M. Cordes,Astrophys. J. 311, 183 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  26. V. Radhakrishnan and C. S. Shukre, in F. Pacini, ed.,High-Energy Phenomena around Collapsed Stars (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987), p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  27. E. P. J. van den Heuvel, in F. Pacini, ed.,High-Energy Phenomena around Collapsed Stars (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. A. Urpin and D. G. Yakovlev,Sov. Astron. 24, 126 and 425 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Blandfordet al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 204, 1025 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woodward, J.F. On nonminimal coupling of the electromagnetic and gravitational fields: The astrophysical evidence for the Schuster-Blackett conjecture and its implications. Found Phys 19, 1345–1361 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00732756

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00732756

Keywords

Navigation