Skip to main content
Log in

The Significance of Non-vertical Transmission of Phenotype for the Evolution of Altruism

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to demonstrate that a very simple learning rule based on imitation can help to sustain altruism as a culturally transmitted pattern or behaviour among agents playing a standard prisoner’s dilemma game. The point of this demonstration is not to prove that imitation is single-handedly responsible for existing levels of altruism (a thesis that is false), nor is the point to show that imitation is an important factor in explanations for the evolution of altruism (a thesis already prominent in the existing literature). The point is to show that imitation contributes to the evolution of altruism in a particular way that is not always fairly represented by evolutionary game theory models. Specifically, the paper uses a simple model to illustrate that cultural transmission includes mechanisms that do not transmit phenotype vertically (i.e. from parent to related offspring) and that these mechanisms can promote altruism in the absence of any direct biological propensity favouring such behaviour. This is a noteworthy result because it shows that evolutionary models can be built to explicitly reflect the contribution of non-vertical transmission in our explanations for the evolution of altruism among humans and other social species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. Axelrod (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation Basic Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Binmore L. Samuelson (1997) ArticleTitleMuddling through: noisy equilibrium selection J. Economic Theory 74 235–265 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jeth.1996.2255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Bjornmerstedt J. Weibull (1996) Nash equilibrium and evolution by imitation K. Arrow (Eds) et al. The Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior Macmillan New York 155–171

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Boyd P.J. Richerson (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process The University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Boyd P.J. Richerson (2004) Not By Genes Alone University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Dawkins (1976) The Selfish Gene Oxford Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • D.C. Dennett (1975) ArticleTitleWhy the law of effect will not go away J. Theory Social Behav. 5 179–187

    Google Scholar 

  • D.C. Dennett (1996) Darwin’s Dangerous Idea Touchstone Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • L.A. Dugatkin (2000) The Imitation Factor The Free Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • W.H. Durham (1991) Coevolution: Genes, Culture and Human Diversity Stanford University Press Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Eshel L. Samuelson A. Shaked (1998) ArticleTitleAltruists, egoists and hooligans in a local interaction model J. Econ. Literature 88 157–179

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gale K. Binmore L. Samuelson (1995) ArticleTitleLearning to be imperfect: the ultimatum game Games Econ. Behav. 8 56–90 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0899-8256(05)80017-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Henrich R. Boyd S. Bowles C. Camerer E. Fehr H. Gintis R. McElreath (2001) ArticleTitleIn search of homo economicus: behavioural experiments in fifteen small-scale societies Am. Econ. Rev. 91 73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. 1991. Idea for a universal history with cosmopolitan purpose. In: Reiss H. (ed.), Kant’s Political Writings. 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • P. Kitcher (1993) ArticleTitleThe evolution of human altruism J. Phil. XC 501

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Kitcher (1999) ArticleTitleGames social animals play: commentary on Brian Skyrms’ evolution of the social contract Phil. Phenomenol. Res. 59 221–228

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Schlag (1998) ArticleTitleWhy imitateand if so how? A bounded rational approach to the multi-armed bandits J. Econ. Theory 78 130–156 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jeth.1997.2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Skyrms (1996) Evolution of the Social Contract Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms B. 1999. Precis of evolution of the social contract and reply to critics. Phil. Phenomenol. Res. 59: 217–220and and 243-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Skyrms (2000) ArticleTitleStability and explanatory significance of some simple evolutionary models Phil. Sci. 67 94–113 Occurrence Handle10.1086/392763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Sober D.S. Wilson (1994) ArticleTitleReintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences Behav. Brain Sci. 17 585–654

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Sober D.S. Wilson (1998) Unto Others: the Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • D.S. Wilson L.A. Dugatkin (1997) ArticleTitleGroup selection and assortative interactions Am. Nat. 149 336–351 Occurrence Handle10.1086/285993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Woodcock J. Heath (2002) ArticleTitleThe robustness of altruism as an evolutionary strategy Biol. Phil. 17 567–590

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Woodcock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woodcock, S. The Significance of Non-vertical Transmission of Phenotype for the Evolution of Altruism. Biol Philos 21, 213–234 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-8241-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-8241-1

Keywords

Navigation