Abstract
An account of analogical characterization is developed in which the following things are claimed.
-
(1)
Analogical predications are irreflexive, asymmetrical, atransitive and non-inversive.
-
(2)
Analogies A and B share role-similarity descriptions sufficiently abstract to overcome the differences between A and B. Analogies pivot on the point of limited similarity and substantial, even radical, difference.
-
(3)
The semantical theory for sentences making analogical attributions requires a distinction between (sentential) meaning as truth conditions and (sentential) meaning as a functional compound of the meanings of contained lexical items. Analogical sentences possess both kinds of meaning. They are true via their truth conditions and would be false via their ‘lexical’ meanings. The distinctive feature of the ‘lexical’ meaning of analogical sentences is the tightness of constraints on closure. The implications of analogical sentences, given their lexical meanings, though ‘there’, aren't drawn. It is in this sense that analogies are made and not found.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bosanquet, Bernard: 1911, Logic or the Morphology of Knowledge, 2d edn., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bunge, Mario: 1974, Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. I, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Carney, James D. and Richard K. Scheer: 1980, Elements of Logic, 3d edn., Macmillan, New York.
Copi, Irving M.: 1986, Introduction to Logic, 7th edn., Macmillan, New York.
Giere, Ronald: 1984, Understanding Scientific Reasoning, 2d edn., Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Hacking, Ian: 1975, Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hesse, Mary: 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.
Hesse, Mary: 1988, ‘Theories, Family Resemblances and Analogy’, in D. H. Helman (ed.), Analogical Reasoning: Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, and Philosophy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 317–40.
Hintikka, Jaakko: 1987, ‘The Fallacy of Fallacies’, Argumentation 1, 211–38.
Hofstadter, Douglas R.: 1986, ‘Analogies and Roles in Human Thinking and Machine Thinking’, in Metamagical Themes: A Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern, Bantam Books, New York, pp. 547–602.
Joseph, H. W. B.: 1916, An Introduction to Logic, 2d edn., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Keynes, J. M.: 1963, A Treatise on Probability, Macmillan, London.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson: 1980, Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lewis, David: 1978, ‘Truth in Fiction’, American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 37–46 (reprinted with postcripts in Lewis, David: 1983, Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 261–68).
MacCormac, Earl: 1983, ‘Scientific Metaphors as Necessary Conceptual Limitations of Science’, in Nicholas Rescher (ed.), The Limits of Lawfulness, University Press of America, Lanham, MD, pp. 61–68.
MacCormac, Earl: 1985, A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Mill, J. S.: 1961, A System of Logic, Longman's Green, London.
Parsons, Terence: 1980, Non-Existent Objects, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Perrin, Porter G. and Wilma R. Ebbitt: 1972, Writer's Guide and Index to English, Scott Foreman, Glenview, IL.
Polya, G.: 1954, Induction and Analogy in Mathematics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Quine, W. V.: 1977, ‘Natural Kinds’, in Stephen P. Schwartz (ed.), Naming, Necessity and Natural Kinds, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp. 155–75.
Quine, W. V.: 1981, Theories and Things, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rescher, Nicholas: 1985, The Strife of Systems: An Essay on the Grounds and Implications of Philosophical Diversity, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
Ross, James F.: 1981, Portraying Analogy, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Schwartz, Stephen P. (ed.): 1977, Naming, Necessity and Natural Kinds, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Stebbing, L. Susan: 1961, A Modern Introduction to Logic, Harper Torchbooks, New York.
Thom, René: 1975, Structural Stability and Morphogenesis, W. A. Benjamin, Reading, MA.
Ulam, S. M.: 1983, Adventures of a Mathematician, 2d edn., Charles Scribner's Sons, New York.
Weddle, Perry: 1978, ‘Comparison’, in Argument: A Guide to Critical Thinking, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 138–60.
Woods, John: 1965, ‘Was Achilles' “Achilles' Heel” Achilles' Heel?’, Analysis XXV, 142–46.
Woods, John: 1974a, The Logic of Fiction, Mouton, The Hague.
Woods, John: 1974b, ‘Semantic Kinds’, Philosophia III, 117–51.
Woods, John and Brent Hudak: 1989, ‘By Parity of Reasoning’, Informal Logic XI, 125–39.
Woods, John and Douglas Walton: 1982, Argument: The Logic of the Fallacies, McGraw-Hill, Toronto.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Igor Stravinsky, quoted in Hofstadter (1986, p. 562). We are much indebted to Hofstadter's stimulating essay.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woods, J., Hudak, B. Verdi is the puccini of music. Synthese 92, 189–220 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414299
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414299