Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

History in the Abstract: ‘Brahman-ness’ and the Discipline of Nyāya in Seventeenth-Century Vārāṇasī

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last fifteen years, studies on Sanskrit intellectual history between the fifteenth and eighteenth centuries have produced a body of scholarship that has fundamentally reshaped our understanding of the period. Yet, despite significant advances in the understanding of the social-historical circumstances of authors and disciplines as well as success in elucidating major features of intellectual thought, a main point of difficultly has been in combining both the intellectuality and sociality of Sanskrit scholars. By examining a debate within the discipline of nyāya during the seventeenth century about how one cognizes the universal property ‘Brahman-ness (brāhmaṇatva)’ and by connecting it with a social debate that is found in available historical documents of the period, this essay attempts to combine the sociality of the Brahman scholarly community in Vārāṇasī with their intellectuality and offer a larger analysis of nyāya intellectual history for this period. The essay concludes by considering the ways in which the social world impinged upon nyāya argumentation and nyāya argumentation upon the social world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abhyankar, V. S. (Rev. and Ed.). (1978). Nyāyakośa or dictionary of technical terms of Indian Philosophy. Poona: The Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.

  • Acharya, P. (1996). Indigenous education and brahmanical hegemony in Bengal. In N. Crook (Ed.), The transmission of knowledge in South Asia (pp. 98–118). Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aithal, K. P. (Comp.). (1972). Descriptive catalogue of Sanskrit manuscripts, Vol. 8: Sāṃkhya, Yoga, Vaiśeṣika and Nyāya. The Adyar Library Series (Vol. 100), in collaboration with T. H. Visvanathan & A. A. Ramanathan. Madras: Adyar Library and Research Centre.

  • Apte, D. V. (1935). Sārasvatāṃceṃ Brāhmaṇatva. Bharata Itihasa Samshodaka, 15(4), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, D. (1945). Bengali scholars at Benaras (1657 A.D.). Indian Historical Quarterly, 21, 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, D. (1948). Raghupati Upadhyaya. Journal of the Ganganatha Jha Research Institute, 5, 379–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, D. (2007). Bāṅgālīr Sārasvata Abadān: Baṅge Nabyanyāẏacarcā. Kalikata: Bangiya Sahitya Parishat. (Reprint of 1952 edition.)

  • Brāhmaṇatvanirūpaṇa of Rudra Nyāyavācaspati. Vaidika Samshodana Mandala, Pune. MSS No. 6692 [Complete, Devanagari].

  • Brāhmaṇatvavāda [anonymous]. Sarasvati Bhavan Library (Sampurnanand Sanskrit University). Roll No. 1932, MSS No. 31393 [Incomplete, Bengali Script].

  • Brāhmaṇatvavicāra [anonymous]. India Office Library of the British Library. MSS No. 1191b [2015] [Part of bundle catalogued under the title Muktivivecanādi, Complete, Bengali Script; complete version of the Brāhmaṇatvavāda].

  • Collingwood, R. G. (1939). An autobiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, M. M. (1994). The changing notion of Śiṣṭa From Patañjali to Bhatr̥hari. In S. Bhatte & J. Bronkhorst (Eds.), Bhartr̥hari, philosopher and grammarian: Proceedings of the first international conference on Bhartr̥hari (University of Poona, January 6–8, 1992) (pp. 95–116). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, M. M. (2010). Pañca Gauḍa and Pañca Drāviḍa: Contested borders of a traditional classification. In K. Kartunnen (Ed.), Anantaṁ Śāstram: Indological and linguistic studies in honour of Bertil Tikkanen (Studia Orientalia, Vol. 108, pp. 29–58). Helsinki: Societes Orientalis Finnica.

  • Dezső, C. (Ed. and Trans.). (2005). Much Ado about religion by Bhatta Jayanta. The Clay Sanskrit Library Series. New York: New York University Press and JJC Foundation.

  • Dvidevi, M. N. (Ed.). (1886). The Tarkakaumudi being an introduction to the principles of the Vaisheshika and the Nyāya Philosophies by Laugākshi Bhāskara. Bombay Sanskrit Series No. 33. Bombay: Government Central Book Depot.

  • Franco, E. (Ed.). (2013). Periodization and historiography of Indian philosophy. Publications of the De Nobili Research Library (37). Vienna: Verein Sammlung de Nobili; Institut fur Sudasien, Tibet und Buddhismuskunde der Universitat Wien.

  • Ganeri, J. (2011). The lost age of reason: Philosophy in early modern India 1450–1700. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gode, P. K. (1943–1944). Some new evidence regarding Devabhaṭṭa Mahāśabde, the father of Ratnākarabhaṭṭa, the Guru of Sevai Jaising of Amber (AD 1699–1743). Poona Orientalist, 8(3–4), 131–138.

  • Gunijkar, R. B. (1884). Sarasvatī Maṇḍala. Bombay: Nirnayasagar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbfass, W. (1991). Tradition and reflection: Explorations in Indian thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasurkar, S. S. (1959). Nirvāṇa-Vicāra. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 40(1/4), 70–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, P. V. (1953). History of Dharmaśāstra (ancient and mediaeval religious and civil law) (Vol. 4). Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkowski, C. (2002). Nīlakaṇṭha Caturdhara’s Mantrakāśīkhaṇḍa. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 122(2), 329–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkowski, C. (2011). Advaita Vedānta in early modern history. In R. O’Hanlon & D. Washbrook (Eds.), Religious cultures in early Modern India: New perspectives (pp. 105–142). Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkowski, C., O?Hanlon, R., & Venkatkrishnan, A. (Eds.). (2015a). Discipline, sect, lineage and community [Special Issue]. South Asian History and Culture, 6(1).

  • Minkowski, C., O’Hanlon, R., & Venkatkrishnan, A. (2015b). Social history in the study of Indian intellectual cultures. South Asian History and Culture, 6(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra, B., & Shastri, D. (Eds.). (1936). Vādavāridhi by Śrī Śrī Gadādhara Bhaṭṭācārya and others. Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series No. 446. Banaras: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.

  • Molesworth, J. T. (1857). A dictionary, Marathi and English (2nd ed., rev. and enl.). Bombay: Printed for government at the Bombay Education Society’s Press. Accessed from http://dsal.uchicago. edu/dictionaries/molesworth/.

  • O’Hanlon, R. (2010). Letters home: Banaras pandits and the Maratha regions in early modern India. Modern Asian Studies, 44(2), 201–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanlon, R. (2011). Speaking from Śiva’s temple: Banaras scholar households and the Brahman ‘ecumene’ of Mughal India. In Rosalind O’Hanlon & D. Washbrook (Eds.), Religious cultures in early modern India: New perspectives (pp. 174–211). Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanlon, R., & Minkowski, C. (2008). What makes people who they are? Pandit networks and the problem of livelihoods in early modern Western India. The Indian Economic and Social History Review, 45(3), 381–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanlon, R., & Washbrook, D. (Eds.). (2011). Religious cultures in early modern India: New perspectives. Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivelle, P. (1992). The Saṃnyāsa Upaniṣads: Hindu scriptures on asceticism and renunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimputkar, R. S. (1926) [Śaka 1848]. Citalebhaṭṭa Prakaraṇa. Bombay: Karnatak Press.

  • Pollock, S. (2001). New intellectuals in seventeenth-century India. Indian Economic and Social History Review, 38(1), 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, S. (2002). Introduction: Working papers on sanskrit knowledge—systems on the eve of colonialism. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 30(5), 431–439.

  • Pollock, S. (2005a). The ends of man at the end of premodernity. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, S. (2005b). Working papers on sanskrit knowledge—systems on the eve of colonialism, II. Journal of Indian Philosophy. doi:10.1007/s10781-004-9050-6.

  • Pollock, S. (Ed.). (2011). Forms of knowledge in early modern Asia: Explorations in the intellectual history of Indian and Tibet, 1500–1800. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, S., & Houben, J. E. M. (2008). Theory and method in Indian intellectual history. Journal of Indian Philosophy. doi:10.1007/s10781-008-9050-z.

  • Potter, K., & Bhattacharya, S. (2011). The encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Vol. 13. Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika philosophy from 1515 to 1660. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarma, K. M. K. (1945). The earliest dated MS of Kamalākara’s work. The Poona Orientalist, 10(1–2), 2.

  • Sastri, J. (1927). Māṃsatattvaviveka by Viśvanātha Nyāyapañcānana. Banaras: Government Sanskrit Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastri, P. D. (Ed.). (1973). The Śabdaśaktiprakāśikā by Jagadīśa Tarkālaṅkāra with two Commentaries The Kriśnakānti by Krishnakānta Vidyāvāgiśa and The Prabodhinī by Rāmabhadra Siddhānta Vāgiśa. Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastry, R. A. K. (Ed.). (1921). Kavīndrācāryasūcipatram, Kavindracharya list. Baroda: Central Library.

  • Sastry, C. S. R. (1923). Kārikāvalī with [Siddhānta]muktāvalī, Prabhā, Mañjuṣā, Dinakarīya, Rāmadrudrīya, Gaṅgārāma Jaṭīya. Madras: Sri Balamanorama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, U. P. (Ed.). (1960). Gīrvāṇapadamañjarī and Gīrvāṇavāṅmañjarī. The M.S. University Oriental Series No. 4. Baroda: Oriental Institute.

  • Sharf, P. (1996). The denotation of generic terms in ancient Indian Philosophy: Grammar, Nyāya, and Mīmāṃsā. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of politics, Vol. I: Regarding method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sukla, S. N. (Ed.). (1971). Nyāyamañjarī of Jayanta Bhaṭṭa (Part I). The Kashi Sanskrit Series 106, Nyaya Section No. 15. Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.

  • Śyenavījātidharmāṇāṃ Nirṇaya. (1914) [Śaka 1835]. Bharata Itihasa Samshodaka Mandala Varsika Itivrtta. Bharata Itihasa Samshodaka Mandala Granthamala Pustaka, 7, 294–305.

  • Tarafdar, M. R. (1965). Husain Shāhī Bengal 1494–1538 AD: A socio-political study. Dacca: Asiatic Society of Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarkatirtha, T. N., & Tarkatirtha, A. (Eds.). (1936). Nyāyadarśanam with Vātsyāyana’s Bhāṣya, Uddyotakāra’s Vārttika, Vācaspati Miśra’s Tātparyaṭikā, and Viśvanātha’s Vr̥tti. Calcutta: Metropolitan Printing and Publishing House (Lmt).

  • Tripathi, A. K. (Ed.). (2012). Tarkasaṃgrahaḥ sānuvādaḥ nyāyabodhinyāḥ saṃskrt̥ ahindīkalādvayavyākhyayā padakr̥tyasya hindīṭippaṇena copetaḥ. Dilli: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veezhinathan, N. (Ed.). (1988). New Catalogus Catalogorum: An alphabetical register of Sanskrit and allied works and authors (Vol. 12). Jointly Edited by C. S. Sundaram & N. Gangadharan. Madras: University of Madras.

  • Venkatkrishnan, A. (2015). Ritual, reflection, and religion: The Devas of Banaras. South Asian History and Culture, 6(1), 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidyabhushana, S. C. (1971). A history of Indian logic: Ancient, mediaeval, and modern schools. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2014). From Praśasti to political culture: The Nadia Raj and Malla dynasty in seventeenth-century Bengal. Journal of Asian Studies, 73(2), 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Historical Studies, Nalanda University, Rajgir, Dist: Nalanda, Bihar, 803116, India

    Samuel Wright

Authors
  1. Samuel Wright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Wright.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wright, S. History in the Abstract: ‘Brahman-ness’ and the Discipline of Nyāya in Seventeenth-Century Vārāṇasī. J Indian Philos 44, 1041–1069 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-015-9291-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-015-9291-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation