Abstract
Those who object to David Lewis' modal realism express qualms about philosophical respectability of the Lewisian notion of a possible world and its correlate notion of an inhabitant of a possible world. The resulting impression is that these two notions either stand together or fall together. I argue that the Lewisian notion of a possible world is otiose even for a good Lewisian modal realist, and that one can carry out a good Lewisian semantics for modal discourse without Lewisian possible worls. I do so by generalizing Lewis' own idea that restrictions on quantification “come and go with the pragmatic wind” and relativizing possible worlds as shifting domains of discourse. I then suggest a way to soften the infamous “incredulous stare”.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, R. M.: 1974, ‘Theories of Actuality’, Noûs, 8, 211–31.
Barwise, J. and Etchemendy, J.: 1987, The Liar, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lewis, D.: 1979, ‘Attitudes De Dicto and De Se’, Philosophical Review 88, 513–43.
Lewis, D.: 1983, ‘Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic’, Philosophical Papers, Volume I, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 26–46.
Lewis, D.: 1986, On the Plurality of Worlds, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Lycan, W.: 1979, ‘The Trouble with Possible Worlds’, in Michael J.Loux (ed.), The Possible and the Actual, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 274–316.
Plantinga, A.: 1974, The Nature of Necessity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Stalnaker, R.: 1976, ‘Possible Worlds’, Noûs 10, 65–75.
van Inwagen, P.: 1980, ‘Indexicality and Actuality’, Philosophical Review 89, 403–26.
van Inwagen, P.: 1986, ‘Two Concepts of Possible Worlds’, in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, Jr., and H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11, 193.
Yagisawa, T.: 1988, ‘Beyond Possible Worlds’, Philosophical Studies 53, 175–204.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yagisawa, T. Possible worlds as shifting domains. Erkenntnis 36, 83–101 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401965
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401965