Abstract
Although various studies have shown that farmers believe there is the need for a producer-led initiative to address the environmental problems from agriculture, farmers in several Canadian provinces have been reluctant to widely participate in Environmental Farm Plan (EFP) programs. Few studies have examined the key issues associated with adopting EFP programs based on farmers’, as opposed to policy makers’, perspectives on why producers are reluctant to participate in the program. A study adapting Van Raaij’s (1981) conceptual model of the decision-making environment of the firm, and prospect theory on value functions associated with the gains and losses from risky choices can be used to characterize how farmers perceive potential risks in environmental farm planning. This framework can be used to assert that farmers are concerned about risks of public disclosure of potentially incriminating environmental information from farms because the EFP program requirements for identification and extensive documentation of farm information is perceived by farmers as facilitating the accessibility of environmental information to the public, and public investigative efforts. Although the EFP program does not explicitly generate information about the environmental conditions of a farm nor the disclosure of such information to the public, it creates the possibility of generating and divulging potentially incriminating information that the farmer may want to treat as confidential. Yet, alone, these risks of public disclosure concerns should not prevent farmers from participating in the EFP. Awareness of and participation in environmental farm planning can be increased if farmers and policy makers understand what the risks are, and how they arise. Aspects of the EFP process that have the potential to generate risk of public disclosure concerns relate to farm reviews, documentation and record keeping, and corrective action plans. There are legal and policy instruments that can offer various forms of protection and help minimize such risks, and these need to be assessed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bidgood, M.,A Study of Actions by Simcoe County Environmental Farm Plan Participants (Simcoe County, Barrie, Ontario, 1995).
Cary, J. W. and R. L. Wilkinson, “Perceived Profitability and Farmers’ Conservation Behaviour,”Journal of Agricultural Economics 48 (1997), 13–21.
Centner, T. J., “Agricultural Nuisances: Curbing the Right-to-Farm,”Choices (First Quarter) (2000), 41–45.
Che, Y-K. and D. Earnhart, “Optimal Use of Information in Litigation: Should Regulatory Information be withheld to Deter Frivolous Suits?”The Rand Journal of Economics 28 (1997), 120–134.
Crandall, F. C., “ISO 14001: What Are the Risks of Disclosure?”Journal of Environmental Law and Practice 4(2) (1996), 26–36.
Davy, A., “Environmental Management Systems: ISO 14001 Issues for Developing Countries,” in C. Sheldon (ed.),ISO 14001 and Beyond: Environmental Management Systems in the Real World (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK, 1997), pp. 169–182.
Edwards-Jones, G., “Environmental Auditing in Agriculture: Pipe-Dream or Practical Tool?”Outlook in Agriculture 25(1) (1996), 5–9.
Estrin, D. and J. Swaigen,Environment on Trial: A Guide to Ontario Environmental Law and Policy, Third Edition (Emond Montgomery Publications Ltd, Toronto, Canada, 1993).
Fishbern, C. P. and G. A. Kochenberger, “Two-Piece Von Neuman-Morgenstern Utility Functions,”Decision Science 10(4) (1979), 503–518.
Furman, M.,Environmental Farm Planning: Understanding Prospects for Sustained Change. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada, 1997.
Galanter, E. and P. Pliner, “Cross-Modality Matching of Money against Other Continua,” in H. R. Moskowitz, B. Scharf, and J. C. Stevens (eds.),Sensation and Measurement (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974), pp. 65–76.
Hardaker, J. B., R. B. M. Huirne, and J. R. Anderson,Coping with Risk in Agriculture (CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 1997).
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,”Econometrica 47 (1979), 263–291.
Khanna, M. and L. A. Damon, “EPA’s Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms,”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37 (1999), 1–25.
Klupfel, E. J.,Developing an Understanding of and Recommendations for Promotion of the Ontario Environmental Farm Plan. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Rural Extension Studies, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada, 1998.
Knox, D., G. Jackson, and E. Nevers, “Farm *A*Syst: A Partnership Program to Protect Water Resources,” inClean Water-Clean Environment: 21st Century, Volume III. Conference Proceedings (Kansas City, MO, USA, March 5–8 1995), pp. 167–170.
Laughhunn, J. D., J. W. Payne, and R. Crum, “Managerial Risk Preferences for Below-target Returns,”Management Science 26(12) (1980), 1238–1249.
LJM Environmental Consulting and Pro Agri Consulting Ltd,Incentives for Environmental Sustainability in Agriculture (LJM Environmental Consulting, Fredericton, New Brunswick, 1999).
Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture and Marketing (NSDAM),Environmental Regulations Handbook for Nova Scotia Agriculture NSDAM, Truro, NS, Canada, 1997.
Nova Scotia Department of the Environment (DOE),Environment Act, DOE (The Queen’s Printer, Halifax, 1995).
Nova Scotia Department of the Environment (DOE),Policy on Access to Voluntary Environmental Audits and Environmental Site Assessments, DOE (Halifax, Canada, 1997).
Nova Scotia Federation of Agriculture,Nova Scotia Environmental Farm Plan: Self Assessment Worksheets and Action Plan Worksheets (Nova Scotia Federation of Agriculture, Truro, NS, Canada, 1996).
Nova Scotia Federation of Agriculture,Environmental Farm Plan: Survey Results (Nova Scotia Federation of Agriculture, Truro, NS, Canada, 1998).
Ontario Farm Environmental Coalition,Ontario Environmental Farm Plan, Second Edition (Ontario Federation of Agriculture, Toronto, Canada, 1996).
Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association, “What are Environmental Farm Plans?” inFactsheet (Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association, Guelph, Ontario, 1996).
Pannell, D. J., “Economics, Extension and the Adoption of Land Conservation Innovations in Agriculture,”International Journal of Social Economics 26(1999), 999–1012.
Ribaudo, M. O., “Lessons Learned about the Performance of USDA Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Programs,”Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (1)(1998), 4–10.
Sasseville, D. R., W. G. Wilson, and R. Lawson,ISO 14000 Answer Book: Environmental Management for the World Market (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1997).
Sinden, J. A. and D. A. King, “Adoption of Soil Conservation Measures in Manilla Shire, New South Wales,”Review of Marketing and Agriculture 58(1990), 179–192.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman, “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,”Science 211(30) (1981), 454–458.
Van Raaij, W. F., “Economic Psychology,”Journal of Economic Psychology 1(1981), 1–24.
Van den Broek, B.,The History of Farm Plans in Ontario (Resources Management Branch, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Guelph, Ontario, 1992).
Wall, E., A. Weersink, and C. Swanton,Ontario Agriculture and ISO 14000, Report prepared for the Ontario Farm Environmental Coalition and the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, University of Guelph, 1998.
Wilson, P. N., R. D. Dahlgran, and N. C. Conklin, “‘Perceptions as Reality’ on Large Scale Dairy Farms,”Review of Agricultural Economics 15(1993), 89–101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yiridoe, E.K. Risk of public disclosure in environmental farm plan programs: Characteristics and mitigating legal and policy strategies. J Agric Environ Ethics 13, 101–120 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02694138
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02694138