Skip to main content
Log in

The Practicality of Ancient Virtue Ethics: Greece and China

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Virtue ethics has been charged with being unable to provide solutions to practical moral issues. In response, the defenders of virtue ethics argue that normative virtue ethics exists. The debate is significant on its own, yet both sides of the controversy approach the issue from the assumption that moral philosophy has to tell us what we should do. In this essay, I would like to examine the question regarding the practicality of virtue ethics in a different way. Virtue ethics is an ancient approach shared by both ancient Greek philosophers and classic Chinese Confucians, and indeed, ancient Greeks call ethics “practical science.” How, then, do the ancients themselves view the issue of practicality? This essay shows that there is a notion of practicality which is prominent in both ancient Greek and ancient Chinese virtue ethics but is neglected in today’s ethics. According to this notion, ethics is to transform one’s life. The essay also raises a prospect of the revival of this notion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, 2 vols. Ed. by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Wing-Tsit. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Pres.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, H. 1987. “The Problem of the Elenchos Reconsidered.” Ancient Philosophy 7: 67-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, T. and N. Smith. 1994. Plato’s Socrates. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, Pierre. 2002. What is Ancient Philosophy? Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, R. 1996. “Normative Virtue Ethics.” In How should One Live? Essays on the Virtues. Ed. by Roger Crisp. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, P. J. 2002. “Confucian Self-Cultivation and Mengzi’s Notion of Extension.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Ed. by Liu Xiusheng and P.J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C. 1979. Confucius’s Analects. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louden, R. B. 1997. “On Some Vices of Virtue Ethics.” In Virtue Ethics. Ed. by Roger Crisp and Michael Slote. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nivison, David. 1980. “Mencius and Motivation.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 47: 417-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2002. “Mengzi: Just Not Doing It.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Ed. by Liu Xiusheng and P.J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato, 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Ed. by John M. Cooper. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prichard, H. A. 1912. “Does Moral Philosophy Rest on A Mistake?” Mind 81: 21-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, C. D. C. 1989. Socrates in the Apology. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. 1985. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shun, K. L. 1989. “Moral Reasons in Confucian Ethics.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 16: 317-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, M. C. 1986. Plato’s Socrates’ Conversations. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, B. 1991. “Kwong-loi Shun on Moral Reason in Mencius.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 18: 353-70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlastos, G. 1983. “The Socratic Elenchus.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1: 27-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, David. 2002. “Reason and Analogical Reasoning in Mengzi.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

  • Xunzi. 1988-94. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. Trans. John Knoblock. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiyuan Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, J. The Practicality of Ancient Virtue Ethics: Greece and China. Dao 9, 289–302 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-010-9175-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-010-9175-0

Keywords

Navigation