Abstract
Virtue ethics has been charged with being unable to provide solutions to practical moral issues. In response, the defenders of virtue ethics argue that normative virtue ethics exists. The debate is significant on its own, yet both sides of the controversy approach the issue from the assumption that moral philosophy has to tell us what we should do. In this essay, I would like to examine the question regarding the practicality of virtue ethics in a different way. Virtue ethics is an ancient approach shared by both ancient Greek philosophers and classic Chinese Confucians, and indeed, ancient Greeks call ethics “practical science.” How, then, do the ancients themselves view the issue of practicality? This essay shows that there is a notion of practicality which is prominent in both ancient Greek and ancient Chinese virtue ethics but is neglected in today’s ethics. According to this notion, ethics is to transform one’s life. The essay also raises a prospect of the revival of this notion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, 2 vols. Ed. by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chan, Wing-Tsit. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Pres.
Benson, H. 1987. “The Problem of the Elenchos Reconsidered.” Ancient Philosophy 7: 67-85.
Brickhouse, T. and N. Smith. 1994. Plato’s Socrates. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hadot, Pierre. 2002. What is Ancient Philosophy? Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
Hursthouse, R. 1996. “Normative Virtue Ethics.” In How should One Live? Essays on the Virtues. Ed. by Roger Crisp. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Ivanhoe, P. J. 2002. “Confucian Self-Cultivation and Mengzi’s Notion of Extension.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Ed. by Liu Xiusheng and P.J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Lau, D. C. 1979. Confucius’s Analects. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Louden, R. B. 1997. “On Some Vices of Virtue Ethics.” In Virtue Ethics. Ed. by Roger Crisp and Michael Slote. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nivison, David. 1980. “Mencius and Motivation.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 47: 417-32.
_____. 2002. “Mengzi: Just Not Doing It.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Ed. by Liu Xiusheng and P.J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Plato, 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Ed. by John M. Cooper. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Prichard, H. A. 1912. “Does Moral Philosophy Rest on A Mistake?” Mind 81: 21-37.
Reeve, C. D. C. 1989. Socrates in the Apology. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Schwartz, B. 1985. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
Shun, K. L. 1989. “Moral Reasons in Confucian Ethics.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 16: 317-43.
Stokes, M. C. 1986. Plato’s Socrates’ Conversations. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Van Norden, B. 1991. “Kwong-loi Shun on Moral Reason in Mencius.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 18: 353-70.
Vlastos, G. 1983. “The Socratic Elenchus.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1: 27-58.
Wong, David. 2002. “Reason and Analogical Reasoning in Mengzi.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Xunzi. 1988-94. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. Trans. John Knoblock. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, J. The Practicality of Ancient Virtue Ethics: Greece and China. Dao 9, 289–302 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-010-9175-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-010-9175-0