Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Instruments of Abolition, or Why Retributivism is the Only Real Justification of Punishment

  • Published:
Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Victor Tadros’ The Ends of Harm is the most recent systematic attempt to defend the good old utilitarian justification of punishment. The attempt fails for a variety of reasons, which are here explored. First, the attempt presupposes an implausible account of human’s psychology. Second, the attempt confuses an attack on retributivism with an attack on certain criminal justice systems. Finally, Tadros admits that his justification of punishment is best seen as a mere step along the road to full-blown abolitionism – and so he unwittingly admits the extraordinarily thin sense in which he could be said to be really attempting to justify punishment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leo Zaibert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaibert, L. The Instruments of Abolition, or Why Retributivism is the Only Real Justification of Punishment. Law and Philos 32, 33–58 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-012-9156-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-012-9156-z

Keywords

Navigation