Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do Credible Firms Perform Better in Emerging Markets? Evidence from China

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior research suggests that corporate credibility is associated with firm financial performance in developed countries. This article examines whether corporate credibility is related to firm performance using Economic Observer’s rating of corporate credibility in China, the largest emerging market in the world. Based on a four-stage valuation model, we find that more reputable and credible firms outperform those with low ratings by almost 20% in 3-year stock returns and have better 3-year net profit margins, return on equity, and sales growth. This study is the first to directly examine the relationship between corporate credibility and firm performance in emerging markets such as China, and our results confirm that firms with high credibility exhibit better financial and market performance at least in the following 3 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonovich, P. and D. Laster: 1998, ‹Do Investors Mistake a Good Company for a Good Investment?’, Working Paper, Federal Reserve Board, New York

  • Banz, R. W. (1981). The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 3–18. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(81)90018-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L., Jemier, J. M., & Lafferty, B. A. (2006). Corporate Reputation: The Definitional Landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), 26–38. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the Resource-Based View a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41–56. doi:10.2307/259393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, R. P., & Ritter, J. R. (1986). Investment Banking, Reputation, and Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1-2), 213–232. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(86)90055-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, A., Wright, P., Bachman, J., & Davies, J. 1998. In Search of Shareholder Value (FT Pitman, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, M. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Reinventing the Meaning of Development? International Affairs, 81(3), 515–524. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00466.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. B. (2002). An Examination of Issues That Complicate the Concept of Reputation in Business Studies. International Studies of Management and Organization, 32(3), 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E., & Porter, M. E. (1977). From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(2), 241–262. doi:10.2307/1885416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S. Y., T. Schneeweis and K. Eneroth: 1999, ‹Corporate Reputation and Investment Performance: The UK and US Expertise’, SSRN Electronic Paper Collection

  • Clayman, M. (1987). ‹In Search of Excellence: The Investor’s Viewpoint’. Financial Analysts Journal, 43(3), 54–63. doi:10.2469/faj.v43.n3.54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42–56. doi:10.2307/255956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, T., Koller, T., & Murrin, J. 2000. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies (John Wiley & Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance. Financial Management, 16(1), 5–14. doi:10.2307/3665543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, I., & Halpern, P. (2001). Implicit Claims: The Role of Corporate Reputation in Value Creation. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(1), 42–49. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G. (2006). How Good Corporate Reputations Create Corporate Value. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(2), 134–143. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. L. M. and J. Schwalbach: 1998. ‹Corporate Reputation and Performance in Germany’, Paper Presented at the 19th Annual International Conference of the Strategic Management Society

  • Fama, E.F. (1991). Efficient Capital Markets: II. The Journal of Finance, 46(5), 1575–1617. doi:10.2307/2328565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465. doi:10.2307/2329112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1995). Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns. The Journal of Finance, 50(1), 131–155. doi:10.2307/2329241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fibeck, G., & Preece, D. (2003). ‹Fortune’s Best 100 Companies to Work for in America: Do They Work for Shareholders?’. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 30(5-6), 771–797. doi:10.1111/1468-5957.05362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J. 1996. Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). ‹What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy’. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 233–258. doi:10.2307/256324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J., & Van Riel, C. B. M. 2004. Fame & Fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations (Pearson Financial Times, London, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G. (1977). Quarterly Accounting Data: Time-Series Properties and Predictive-Ability Results. Accounting Review, 52(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge, L., & Thomas, S. (2007). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Deliberative Reasoning of Canadian and Chinese Accounting Students. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 189–211. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9571-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity Credibility on Consumer Reaction to Advertisements and Brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (1991). The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E. R., & Balmer, J. M. T. (1998). Managing Corporate Image and Corporate Reputation. Long Range Planning, 31(5), 695–702. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00074-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenland, E. A. (2002). Qualitative Research to Validate RQ-Dimensions. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(4), 308–315. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herremans, I. M., Akathaporn, P., & McInnes, M. (1993). An Investigation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation and Economic Performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(7-8), 587–604. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)90044-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. 1998, Strategic Brand Management (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, L. F., & Love, I. (2004). Corporate Governance, Investor Protection, and Performance in Emerging Markets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(5), 703–728. doi:10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00046-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. M., & Wilson, R. (1982). Reputation and Imperfect Information. Journal of Economic Theory, 27(2), 253–279. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(82)90030-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate Ownership around the World. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, B. A. (2007). The Relevance of Fit in a Cause-Brand Alliance When Consumers Evaluate Corporate Credibility. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 447–453. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K. C., & Shi, G. (2008). Factors Affecting Ethical Attitudes in Mainland China and Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(4), 463–479. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9360-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landon, S., & Smith, G. E. (1997). The Use of Quality and Reputation Indicators by Consumers: The Case of Bordeaux Wine. Journal of Consumer Policy, 20(3), 289–323. doi:10.1023/A:1006830218392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. L.: 1998, ‹P&G Wants to be on Tip of Tongues in, Let’s Say, Tianjin’, Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition) Aug 24, 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. (1995). The New Issues Puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 50(1), 23–51. doi:10.2307/2329238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maathuis, O., Rodenburg, J., & Sikkel, D. (2004). Credibility, Emotion or Reason? Corporate Reputation Review, 6(4), 333–345. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, J. F., & Wartick, S. L. (2003). Dealing with Stakeholders: How Reputation, Credibility and Framing Influence the Game. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 19–35. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. B., Alison, S., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872. doi:10.2307/256342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. B., Schneeweis, T., & Branch, B. (1990). Perceptions of Firm Quality: A Cause or Result of Firm Performance. Journal of Management, 16(1), 167–180. doi:10.1177/014920639001600112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1982). Predation, Reputation and Entry Deterrence. Journal of Economic Theory, 27(2), 280–312. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(82)90031-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Menguc, B. (2005). Corporate Reputation, Stakeholders and the Social Performance – Financial Performance Relationship. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9-10), 1184–1198. doi:10.1108/03090560510610798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S. J., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2001). The Development of a Scale to Measure Perceived Corporate Credibility. Journal of Business Research, 52(3), 235–247. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00104-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review. Business & Society, 40(4), 369–396. doi:10.1177/000765030104000402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman, S. H. (1992). Return to Fundamentals. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 7(4), 465–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penman, S. H. (1996). The Articulation of Price-Earnings Ratios and Market-to-Book Ratios and the Evaluation of Growth. Journal of Accounting Research, 34(2), 235–259. doi:10.2307/2491501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M. (1993). A Status-Based Model of Market Competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 829–872. doi:10.1086/230091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J. R. (1991). The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 3–27. doi:10.2307/2328687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P., & Dowling, G. (2002). Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077–1093. doi:10.1002/smj.274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C., & Thomsen, S. (2004). The Impact of Corporate Reputation on Performance: Some Danish Evidence. European Management Journal, 22(2), 201–210. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2004.01.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, J., & Percy, L. 1997. Advertising Communications and Promotion Management. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. P.: 1987, ‹Theory, Strategy and Entrepreneurship,’ in The Competitive Challenge (Harper & Row, New York), pp. 137–158

  • Sabate, J. M., & Puente, E. (2003). Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Reputation and Financial Performance: A Survey of the Literature. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(2), 161–177. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, J. L. F., & Sotorrio, L. L. (2007). The Creation of Value through Corporate Reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(3), 335–346. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9285-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1985). Do Markets Differ Much? The American Economic Review, 75(3), 341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, M., & de Chernatony, L. (2002). Corporate Branding. Corporate Reputation Review, 5(2-3), 105–112. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, M., Hatch, M. J., & Larsen, M. H. 2000. The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation and Corporate Brand.(Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, M. (2004). ‹China’s Big, Big Bird’. Time, 163(8), A8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(4), 659–679. doi:10.2307/1881782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, W. G., & Kohers, T. (2002). The Link between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 97–109. doi:10.1023/A:1013082525900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A., & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 2–18. doi:10.2307/1251799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, H. (2002). Employee Identification with the Corporate Identity. International Studies of Management and Organization, 32(3), 28–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudhaman, A.: 2004, ‹China CEOs Awaken to Benefit of CSR’, Media, July 2, 8-8.

  • Wang, Y., Kandampully, J. A., Lo, H. P., & Shi, G. (2006). The Role of Brand Equity and Corporate Reputation in CRM: A Chinese Study. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(3), 179–197. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt, K., & Camerer, C. (1988). Reputation and Corporate Strategy: A Review of Recent Theory and Applications. Strategic Management Journal, 9(5), 443–454. doi:10.1002/smj.4250090505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb, L. L., Erdener, C.B., & Li, C. (1998). Business Ethical Values in China and the US. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 839–852. doi:10.1023/A:1005793424492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism and Firms, Markets and Relationship Contracting (The Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. 1985. Game-theoretic Models of Bargaining (Cambridge University Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., & Li, X. (2003). An Evolving Market Efficiency Test on the Chinese Stock Market. Journal of China Economics, 38(1), 54–61. in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zyglidopoulos, S. C., & Reid, D. M. (2006). Managing Corporate Reputation within the Chinese Context: Future Research Directions. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(3), 155–161. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, P.R. China

    Ran Zhang

  2. Fogelman College of Business and Economics, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152, U.S.A.

    Zabihollah Rezaee

Authors
  1. Ran Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zabihollah Rezaee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zabihollah Rezaee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, R., Rezaee, Z. Do Credible Firms Perform Better in Emerging Markets? Evidence from China. J Bus Ethics 90, 221–237 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0038-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0038-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation