Skip to main content
Log in

WHAT IS THE SCIENCE OF THE SOUL? A CASE STUDY IN THE EVOLUTION OF LATE MEDIEVAL NATURAL PHILOSOPHY

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims at a partial rehabilitation of E. A. Moody's characterization of the 14th century as an age of rising empiricism, specifically by contrasting the conception of the natural science of psychology found in the writings of a prominent 13th-century philosopher (Thomas Aquinas) with those of two 14th-century philosophers (John Buridan and Nicole Oresme). What emerges is that if the meaning of empiricism can be disengaged from modern and contemporary paradigms, and understood more broadly in terms of a cluster of epistemic doctrines concerned with the methodology of knowing, it characterizes very appropriately some of the differences between the ways in which late-medieval thinkers both understood and practised the science of psychology. In particular, whereas Aquinas thinks psychology is about reasoning demonstratively to the real nature of the soul from its evident operations (thereby assimilating psychology to metaphysics), Buridan and Oresme, both of whom doubt whether real animate natures can be known empirically, focus on giving detailed accounts of those operations themselves (thereby assimilating psychology to physics).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, Marilyn McCord: 1987, William Ockham, 2 vols., University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Marilyn McCord: 1990, ‘Ockham's Individualisms', in Vossenkuhl and Schönberger (1990), pp. 3–24.

  • Aquinas, Thomas: 1884, Opera Omnia, Tomus II: Commentaria in Octo Libros Physicorum Aristotelis, Commissio Leonina, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, Thomas: 1889, Opera Omnia, Tomus V: Pars Prima Summae Theologiae: A Quaestione L ad Questionem CXIX, Commissio Leonina, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, Thomas: 1918, Opera Omnia, Tomus XIII: Summa Contra Gentiles, Commissio Leonina, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, Thomas: 1984, Opera Omnia, Tomus XLV,1: Sentencia Libri De Anima, Commissio Leonina, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, Thomas: 1984, Opera Omnia, Tomus XLV,2: Sentencia Libri De Sensu et Sensato, Commissio Leonina, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustine: 1984, City of God, Henry Bettenson (tr.), Penguin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogen, James, and James E. McGuire (eds.): 1985, How Things Are: Studies in Predication and the History and Philosophy of Science, Reidel, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boh, Ivan: 1982, ‘Consequences', in Kretzmann, Kenny, and Pinborg (1982), pp. 300–314.

  • Buridan, John: 1509, Subtilissimae Quaestiones super octo Physicorum libros Aristotelis, Paris. Rpr. 1964, as Kommentar zur Aristotelischen Physik, Minerva, Frankturt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buridan, John: 1513, Quaestiones super decem libros Ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum, Paris. Rpr. 1968, as Super decem libros Ethicorum, Minerva, Frankturt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buridan, John: 1518, In Metaphysicen Aristotelis Questiones argutissimae, Paris.Rpr. 1964, as Kommentar zur Aristotelischen Metaphysik, Minerva, Frankturt a. M. (The original publication date is incorrectly given as 1588 on the frontispiece of the reprint.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buridan, John: 1976, Tractatus de consequentiis, édition critique, ed. Hubert Hubien, Philosophes Médiévaux, Tome XVI, Publications universitaires, Louvain-Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clagett, Marshall: 1959, The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, F. Stuart (ed.): 1953, Averrois Cordubensis: Commentarium Magnum in Aristotelis De Anima Libros, Medieval Academy of America, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denifle, Heinrich, O. P. and Emile Chatelain: 1889–91, Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis, Vols. 1–2, Delalain, Paris.

  • Dronke, Peter (ed.): 1988, A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, Charles C. (ed.): 1970, Dictionary of Scientific Biography, 18 vols., Scribner's, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Edward: 1977, Physical Science in the Middle Ages, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Edward: 1993, ‘Jean Buridan and Nicole Oresme on Natural Knowledge', Vivarium 31, 84–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Bert: 1985, Nicole Oresme and the Marvels of Nature, Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubien, Hubert (ed.): Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in duos libros Aristotelis Posteriorum Analyticorum, unpublished typescript.

  • Hubien, Hubert (ed.): Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in duos libros Aristotelis Priorum Analyticorum, unpublished typescript.

  • Jordan, Mark: 1986, Ordering Wisdom: The Hierarchy of Philosophical Discourses in Aquinas, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, Norman: 1977, ‘Socrates is Whiter than Plato Begins to be White', Noûs 11, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, Norman, Anthony Kenny, and Jan Pinborg (eds.): 1982, TheCambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, Norman and Eleonore Stump (eds.): 1993, The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Helen S.: 1989, ‘Aristotelian Physics: Teleological Procedure in Aristotle, Thomas, and Buridan', The Review of Metaphysics 42, 569–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, A. A. and D. Sedley: 1987, The Hellenistic Philosophers, Vol.1, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, Anneliese: 1958, ZwischenPhilosophie undMechanik, Studien zur Naturphilosophie der Spätscholastik, Bd. V, Storia e Letteratura, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, Anneliese: 1968, Zwei Grundprobleme der scholastischen Naturphilosophie, Storia e Letteratura, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Peter: 1980, ‘Nicolas Oresme's Quaestiones super libros Aristotelis de anima: A Critical Edition with Introduction and Commentary', Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.

  • MacDonald, Scott: 1993, ‘Theory of Knowledge’, in Kretzmann and Stump (1993), pp.160–195.

  • McKeon, Richard (ed.): 1941, The Basic Works of Aristotle, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, E. A.: 1958, ‘Empiricism and Metaphysics in Medieval Philosophy', The Philosophical Review 67, 145– 63. Rpr. in Moody 1975, pp. 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, E. A.: 1970, ‘Buridan, Jean', in Gillespie (1970), Vol. 2, pp. 603–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, E.A.: 1975, Studies in Medieval Philosophy, Science, and Logic: Collected Papers, 1933–1969, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, John E.: 1982, ‘The Analytic Character of Late Medieval Learning: Natural Philosophy without Nature', in Roberts (1982), pp. 171–213.

  • Normore, Calvin: 1985, ‘Buridan's Ontology', in Bogen and McGuire (1985), pp. 194–201.

  • Patar, Benoî t: 1991, La Traité de l'âme de Jean Buridan [De prima lectura], Philosophes Médiévaux, Tome XXIX, Éditions de l'Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, Louvain-La-Neuve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Lawrence D. (ed.): 1982, Approaches to Nature in the Middle Ages, Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, Binghamton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serene, Eileen: 1982, ‘Demonstrative Science', in Kretzmann, Kenny, and Pinborg (1982), pp. 496–517.

  • Sobol, Peter Gordon: 1984, ‘John Buridan on the Soul and Sensation: An Edition of Book II of His Commentary on Aristotle's Book of the Soul, with an Introduction and a Translation of Question 18 on Sensible Species', Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.

  • Stump, Eleonore: 1989, Dialectic and its Place in the Development of Medieval Logic, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylla, Edith: 1973, ‘Medieval Concepts of the Latitude of Forms: The Oxford Calculators', Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 40, 223–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylla, Edith: 1982, ‘The Oxford Calculators', in Kretzmann, Kenny, and Pinborg (1982), pp. 540–563.

  • Tweedale, Martin: 1988, ‘Logic (i): Fromthe Late Eleventh Century to the Time of Abelard', in Dronke (1988), pp. 196–226.

  • Vossenkuhl, Wilhelm, and Rolf Schönberger (eds.): 1990, Die Gegenwart Ockhams, VCH Acta humaniora, Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, Allan B., O.F.M.: 1986, Duns Scotus on the Will and Morality, Catholic University of America Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Rega and Gedeon, Gál, O.F.M. (eds.): 1990, Adam de Wodeham: Lectura Secunda in Librum Primum Sententiarum: Prologus et Distinctio Prima, St. Bonaventure University Press, St. Bonaventure, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupko, John Alexander: 1989, ‘John Buridan's Philosophy of Mind: An Edition and Translation of Book III of his ‘Questions on Aristotle's De anima', (Third Edition), with Commentary and Critical and Interpretative Essays', Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.

  • Zupko, Jack: 1993a, ‘How are Souls Related to Bodies?: A Study of John Buridan', Review of Metaphysics 46, 575–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupko, Jack: 1993b, ‘Buridan and Skepticism', Journal of the History of Philosophy 31, 191–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zupko, J. WHAT IS THE SCIENCE OF THE SOUL? A CASE STUDY IN THE EVOLUTION OF LATE MEDIEVAL NATURAL PHILOSOPHY. Synthese 110, 297–334 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004969404080

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004969404080

Keywords

Navigation