Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identifying gender aspects of new irrigation management policies

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Instead of technological policyprescriptions, the search for solutions to managementproblems in irrigation systems is increasingly soughtin organizational and institutional reforms. Thereseems to be an emerging consensus that water and moneysavings can be brought about by (1) treating water asan economic good; and (2) decentralizing themanagement of irrigation water. Policies based on thisconsensus are being implemented in a large number ofcountries. On the basis of insights derived fromfeminist economics, the paper identifies and discussesgender biases of new irrigation management policies.The paper shows that policies do not explicitlyconsider the possibility that women are water users,and are implicitly based on a belief that all usersare equally able to pay for water. Calculations aboutexpected increases in efficiency may be wrong, becausethey do not take women‘s unpaid contributions tothe economy into account. Existing evidence about theimpacts of irrigation programs shows that these haveprovoked changes in the costs of irrigation or users,in water use practices, and in the accountabilitybetween users and providers of water. No empiricalinformation exists to ascertain whether these changesare gender specific. Impact studies do not addressgender concerns, and methods employed in impactstudies do not allow a critical re-assessment of thetheories underlying new irrigation policies. Thisreinforces the idea that gender or women do not matterand seriously limits the understanding of thedeterminants of irrigation management performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, B. (1997). “‘Bargaining’ and gender relations: Within and beyond the household,” FCND Discussion Paper 27. Washington DC, USA: IFPRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azziz, Y. A. (1994).“Irrigation management transfer: Development and turnover to private water user associations in Egypt,” Paper Presented at the International Conference on Irrigation Management Transfer(pp. 20–24), September, Wuhan, China.

  • Basnet, K. (1992). “Beyond the Chadar and the Chardiwari: Women in irrigated areas of Punjab.” Mimeo. Lahore, Pakistan: IIMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, C. J. 1997. “Bringing water markets down to earth: The political economy of water rights in Chile, 1976–95,” World Development25(5): 6339–6656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, J. (1996). “Water as an economic good: The idea and what it means in practice,” in Transactions of the 16th Congress on Irrigation and Drainage–Volume 1E. New Delhi, India: International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunt, D. (1992). Mastering the Struggle. Gender Actors and Agrarian Change in a Mexican Ejido, Latin America Studies 64. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: CEDLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, F. and D. Elson (1995). Women and Water Resources: Continued Marginalisation and New Policies, Gatekeeper Series 49. London, UK: IIED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson, D. (1989). “The impact of structural adjustment on women: Concepts and Issues,” in B. Onimode (ed.), The IMF, the World Bank and the African Debt, Vol. 2 (The Social and Political Impact)(pp. 65–74). London, UK: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, H. D. (1996). “Water crisis in developing world: Misconceptions about solutions,” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management(March/April): 79–87.

  • Gould, G. A. (1988). “Water rights transfers and third party effects,” Land and Water Law Review23(1): 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. and S. Baden (1995). “Integrated water resources management: A gender perspective,” IDS Bulletin26(1): 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, B. and J. K. Boyce (1983). A Quiet Violence: View from a Bangladesh Village.London, UK: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illo, J. F. (1988). Irrigation in the Philippines: Impact on Women and Their Households. The Aslong Project Case.Women's Roles and Gender Differences in Development: Cases for Planners Asia 2. Bangkok, Thailand: The Population Council, Regional Office for South and East Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. H. III (1996). “Irrigation management transfer in México: Moving toward sustainability,” Paper Presented at the 6th Annual Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, June 5–9. University of California, Berkeley, CA.

  • Johnson, S. H. III and P. Reiss (1993). Can Farmers Afford to Use Wells after Turnover? A Study of Pump Irrigation Turnover in Indonesia.Short Report Series on Irrigation Management Transfer 1. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IIMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordans, E. and M. Zwarteveen (1997). A Well of One's Own. Gender Analysis of an Irrigation Program in Bangladesh.Bangladesh Country Report 1. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IIMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloezen, W. H., C. Garcés-Restrepo, and S. H. Johnson III (1997). Irrigation Management Transfer Impact Assessment of The Upper Lerma River Irrigation District (ULRID), México.Research Report. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IIMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kome, A. (1997). Gender and Irrigation Management Transfer in Sri Lanka.Unpublished MSc Thesis. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IRMU, IIMI, ID/Wageningen, The Netherlands: Department of Gender Studies in Agriculture, Department of Irrigation, WAU.

  • Krol, M. (1994). “Irrigatie is mannenwerk.” Genderverhoudingen in een kleinschalig irrigatieprojekt in de Ecuadoriaanse Andes.Unpublished MSc Thesis. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Department of Gender Studies in Agriculture, Department of Irrigation, WAU.

  • Lynch, D. B. (1991). “Women and irrigation in highland Peru,” Society and Natural Resources4: 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandall, M. A. S. and D. E. Parker (1995). Evolution and Implications of Decreased Public Involvement in Minor Irrigation Management in Bangladesh. Short Report Series on Locally Managed Irrigation 11. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IIMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinzen-Dick, R., A. Manzardo, and R. Reidinger (1995). “Participation in irrigation.” Environment Department Participation Series Paper No. 3. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinzen-Dick, R. and M. Z. Zwarteveen (1997). “Gender dimensions of community resource management: The case of water users' associations in South Asia,” Paper Presented at the Women and Water Workshop, 15–19 September. Sri Lanka: IIMI.

  • Merrey, D. J. (1997). Institutional Design Principles for Accountability on Large Irrigation Systems. Research Report 8. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IIMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, V. S. and D. J. Molden (1995). Management Turnover in the West Gandak Irrigation System, Nepal.Short Report Series on Locally Managed Irrigation 14. Colombo, Sri Lanka.

  • Moore, M. (1989). “The fruits and fallacies of neoliberalism: The case of Irrigation policy,” World Development17(11): 1733–1750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, M. T. and L. T. Ha (1994). “Irrigation management transfer in Vietnam,” Paper Presented at the International Conference on Irrigation Management Transfer, 20–24 September. Wuhan, China.

  • Ostrom, E. (1992). Crafting Institutions for Self-Governing Irrigation Systems.San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, I. (1991). Gender and Population in the Adjustment of African Economies: Planning for Change. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant, N. (1995). “Turnover of public tubewells in Uttar Pradesh: Case study of a successful cooperative society,” in S. H. Johnson, D. L. Vermillion, and J. A. Sagardoy (eds.), Irrigation Management Transfer. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. J., D. Seckler, and M. Rock (1997). Water as“an Economic Good.” Forthcoming, International Commission of Irrigation and Drainage.

  • Pol, I. van de (n. d.) “Claro, hay que pelear el agua; roles de gènero en las actividades de riego.”Mimeo. Lima, Peru: SNV.

  • Repetto, R. (1986). “Skimming the water: Rent-seeking and the performance of public irrigation systems,” Research Paper 4. Washington: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosegrant, M. W. and R. Gazmuri (1994). “Reforming water allocation policy through markets in tradable water rights: Lessons from Chile, Mexico and California,” EPTD Discussion Paper 6. Washington, DC, USA: IFPRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosegrant, M. W. and H. Binswanger (1994). “Markets in tradable water rights: Potential for efficiency gains in developing country water resource allocation,” World Development22(11): 1613–1625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampath, R. K. (1992). “Issues in irrigation pricing in developing countries,” World Development20(7): 967–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seckler, D. (1993). “Privatizing irrigation systems,” Center for Economic Policy Studies Discussion Paper 12. Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development.

  • Seckler, D. (1996). The New Era of Water Resources Management: From “Dry” to “Wet” Water Savings.Research Report 1. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Irrigation Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1990). “Gender and cooperative conflicts,” in I. Tinker (ed.), Persistent Inequalities. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, G. (1996). “Gender, markets and states: A selective review and research agenda,” World Development24(5): 821–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, T. (1993). Groundwater Markets and Irrigation Development. Political Economy and Practical Policy.Bombay, India: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, T., V. Ballabh, K. Dobrial, and J. Talati (1995). “Turnover of state tubewells to farmer cooperatives: Assessment of Gujarat's experience in India,” in S. H. Johnson, D. L. Vermillion, and J. A. Sagardoy (eds.), Irrigation Management Transfer. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, L. E. and I. Carruthers (1991). Farmer-Financed Irrigation: The Economics of Reform. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strosser, P. and M. Kuper (1994). “Water markets in the Fordwah/Eastern Sadiqia area. An answer to perceived deficiencies in canal water supplies?,” Working Paper 30. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IIMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen, M., J. Trava, and S. H. Johnson III (1997). Lessons from the International Workshop on Participatory Irrigation Management: Benefits and Second Generation Problems(First Draft). Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turral, H. (1995). “Devolution of management in public irrigation systems: Cost shedding, empowerment and performance. A review,” Working Paper 80. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff, N. (with P. Ramamurthy and R. Steiner) (1991). Managing Irrigation. Analyzing and Improving the Performance of Bureaucracies. New Delhi, India: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Koppen, B. and S. Mahmud (1996). Women and Water-Pumps: The Impact of Irrigation on Women's Status.London, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermillion D. L. (1991). “The turnover and self management of irrigation institutions in developing countries. A discussion paper for the Mew program of IIMI,” Discussion Paper. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Irrigation Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermillion, D. L. (1997). Impacts of Irrigation Management Transfer. Research Report 11. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Irrigation Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1982). “The system of administrative and political corruption: Canal irrigation in South India,” Journal of Development Studies18(3): 287–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. C. (1992). Arguing with the Crocodile. Gender and Class in Bangladesh. London and New Jersey, UK: Zed Books Ltd./Dhaka, Bangladesh: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Development (1995). “Gender, adjustment and macroeconomics,” World Development23(11).

  • Wood, G. D., R. Palmer-Jones, Q. F. Ahmed, M. A. S. Mandal, and S. C. Dutta (1990). The Water Sellers. A Cooperative Venture by the Rural Poor.West Hartford, CT, USA: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, F. (1993). “Feminist ideology and welfare economics,” Paper Presented at the Conference: “Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economic Theory”, 2–5 June. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Yap-Salinas, L. H. (1995). “Converging factors in the successful transfer of irrigation management responsibilities to water users' associations in the Dominican Republic,” in S. H. Johnson, D. L. Vermillion, and J. A. Sagardoy (eds.), Irrigation Management Transfer. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarteveen, M. Z. (1997). “Water: From basic need to commodity. A discussion on gender and water rights in the context of irrigation,” World Development25(8): 1335–1349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarteveen, M. Z. (1995). “Gender aspects of irrigation management transfer: Rethinking efficiency and equity,” in S. H. Johnson, D. L. Vermillion, and J. A. Sagardoy (eds.), Irrigation Management Transfer. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarteveen, M. and N. Neupane (1996). Free-Riders or Victims. Women's Non-Participation in Irrigation Management in Nepal's Chhattis Mauja Irrigation Scheme.Research Report 7. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Irrigation Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Schaepmanstraat 109, 6702 AS, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Margreet Z. Zwarteveen

Authors
  1. Margreet Z. Zwarteveen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zwarteveen, M.Z. Identifying gender aspects of new irrigation management policies. Agriculture and Human Values 15, 301–312 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007576700507

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007576700507

Search

Navigation