From PhilPapers forum Philosophy of Mind:

2010-07-02
The time-lag argument for the representational theory of perception
We have probably played this one through but to answer all those last questions: I do not doubt at all that the Annette of your experience is effable. What I am doubting is that this is an experience that either represents or just presents an analogous 'objective' out there Annette. I dislike stuff but am very happy with qualities in experiential space. I eschew the kinematic, preferring the dynamic, which is what is really going on and as real as the actual experiences. Yes, the big bang is the beginning of all real dynamic goings on with only dispositional properties. I refer to the laws of God only in deference to direct translation of Leibniz. For me they are just the laws of our universe. As we know them they are just the dispositional laws they are. As to whether there is some ultimate meta-disposition I am neutral. The definitions are out there - mostly on Wikipedia in fact! 
I did enjoy the exchange though.