From PhilPapers forum Philosophy of Religion:

2014-12-16
The Phrenological Argument
The Phrenological Argument, also known as God's Parapraxis*, offers a new intriguing philosophical argument about God's mental state of inadequacy in his creation of the Human Mind. 

It argues that if God has a perfect mind capable of knowing flawlessly everything in advance without making mistakes, then he should have anticipated ahead of time the repercussion of creating a human mind incapable of knowing what is real and what is true. But he created the human mind that lacks the ability to fathom Truth and Reality, hence God's Mind carries an erroneous lapse somewhere in his memory. This mental erracity provides a good solid evidence that proves God's inadequacy to foreknow in advance that if the human mind is incapable of knowing reality, He will never ever be known. 

The basic form of the argument is as follows:
1. God created the mind 
2. The mind can't detect truth and reality
3. therefore, god will never be known. 

A modified version:
1. If god created the mind for men to know him
2. But god failed to foresee his parapraxis
3. Then, god is not all knowing. 

* A parapraxis, is an error in speech, memory, or physical action that is interpreted as occurring due to the interference of an unconscious subdued wish, conflict, or train of thought.

Excerpt: The Bible proves God doesn't Exist.