Paul Boghossian New York University
Contact
  • No contact info.

Affiliations
  • Faculty, New York University

Areas of specialization
  • None specified

Areas of interest

blank
About me
Silver Professor of Philosophy, NYU Director, NY Institute of Philosophy
My works
79 items found.
Order:
  1.  14
    Paul Boghossian (forthcoming). Rationality, Reasoning and Rules: Reflections on Broome’s Rationality Through Reasoning. Philosophical Studies:1-13.
    The paper provides a critical discussion of some key aspects of John Broome’s theories of rationality, reasoning and the relations between them.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  52
    Paul Boghossian (2016). Reasoning and Reflection: A Reply to Kornblith. Analysis 76 (1):41-54.
    Hilary Kornblith’s book is motivated by the conviction that philosophers have tended to overvalue and overemphasize reflection in their accounts of central philosophical phenomena. He seeks to pinpoint this tendency and to correct it. -/- Kornblith’s claim is not without precedent. It is an oft-repeated theme of 20th-century philosophy that philosophers have tended to give ‘overly intellectualized’ accounts of important phenomena. One thinks here of Wittgenstein, Ryle and many others. -/- One version of this charge is that philosophers have tended (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  49
    Paul Boghossian (2015). Experience, Phenomenal Character and Epistemic Justification. Philosophical Issues 25 (1):243-251.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  89
    Paul Boghossian (2014). Philosophy Without Intuitions? A Reply to Cappelen. Analytic Philosophy 55 (4):368-381.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  31
    Paul Boghossian (2014). Reply to Otero's “Boghossian's Inference Argument Against Content Externalism Reversed”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (1):182-184.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Paul Boghossian (2014). What is Inference? Philosophical Studies 169 (1):1-18.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  7. Paul Boghossian (2012). Inferentialism and the Epistemology of Logic: Reflections on Casalegno and Williamson. Dialectica 66 (2):221-236.
    I defend an inferential account of the logical constants against objections made to it by Paolo Casalegno and Timothy Williamson.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8.  29
    Paul Boghossian (2012). Reply to Amini and Caldwell, Boghossians Refutation of Relativism. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 2 (1):45-49.
    Majid Amini and Christopher Caldwell charge that I misconstrue the relation between relativism and constructivism, on the one hand, and between relativism and skepticism, on the other. In this brief response, I rebut their charges.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Paul A. Boghossian (2012). Blind Rule-Following. In Crispin Wright & Annalisa Coliva (eds.), Mind, Meaning, and Knowledge: Themes From the Philosophy of Crispin Wright. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. Paul Boghossian (2011). O Labirinto Do Relativismo Moral. Revista Inquietude 2 (2):238-245.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Paul Boghossian (2011). Three Kinds of Relativism. In Steven Hales (ed.), A Companion to Relativism. Blackwell
    The paper looks at three big ideas that have been associated with the term “relativism.” The first maintains that some property has a higher-degree than might have been thought. The second that the judgments in a particular domain of discourse are capable only of relative truth and not of absolute truth And the third, which I dub with the oxymoronic label “absolutist relativism,” seeks to locate relativism in our acceptance of certain sorts of spare absolutist principles. -/- The first idea (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  12. Paul Boghossian (2011). The Maze of Moral Relativism. The New York Times.
  13. Paul Boghossian (2011). The Transparency of Mental Content Revisited. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 155 (3):457-465.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Paul Boghossian (2011). Williamson on the A Priori and the Analytic. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):488-497.
  15.  51
    Paul Boghossian (2010). Epistemic Relativism Defended. In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  76
    Paul Boghossian (2010). Our Grasp of the Concept of Truth: Reflections on Künne. Dialectica 64 (4):553-563.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  34
    Paul Boghossian (2010). Review of Mark Richard, When Truth Gives Out. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (5).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Paul Boghossian (2010). Truth in Virtue of Meaning. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):370 - 374.
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Volume 89, Issue 2, Page 370-374, June 2011.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  96
    Paul Boghossian (2010). The Perception of Music: Comments on Peacocke. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):71-76.
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Paul Boghossian (2009). Virtuous Intuitions: Comments on Lecture 3 of Ernest Sosa's a Virtue Epistemology. Philosophical Studies 144 (1):111--119.
    Abstract I agree with Sosa that intuitions are best thought of as attractions to believe a certain proposition merely on the basis of understanding it. However, I don’t think it is constitutive of them that they supply strictly foundational justification for the propositions they justify, though I do believe that it is important that the intuition of a suitable subject be thought of as a prima facie justification for his intuitive judgment, independently of the reliability of his underlying capacities. I (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  1
    Paul Boghossian (2009). Virtuous Intuitions: Comments on Lecture 3 of Ernest Sosa’s A Virtue Epistemology. Philosophical Studies 144 (1):111-119.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Paul Boghossian (2009). What Externalist Can Know 'A Priori'? Analytica 3:92-108.
    Russian translation of Boghossian P. What Externalism Can Know “A Priori”? // Philosophical Issues, 9, 1998. Translated by Vers Eremeeva with kind permission of the author.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  5
    Paul Boghossian (2008). Fear of Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 141 (3):391-398.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  24. Paul Boghossian (2008). Précis of Fear of Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 141 (3):377 - 378.
    Fear of Knowledge was in many ways an exercise in foolhardiness. It was to be a short book, accessible to the general reader, that would treat some of the trickiest issues in the foundations theory of knowledge, but that would nevertheless not seriously shortchange the subtleties that they involve. Someone should have warned me.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Paul Boghossian (2008). Précis of Fear of Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 141 (3):377-378.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  30
    Paul Boghossian (2008). Review: Replies to Wright, MacFarlane and Sosa. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 141 (3):409 - 432.
    The main impetus for my book came from the widespread acceptance of relativistic views about truth and knowledge within the Academy, especially within the humanities and the humanistic social sciences. In its introductory sections, though, I noted that there is one discipline within the humanities in which the influence of relativistic views is quite weak—namely, within analytic philosophy itself. Ironically, no sooner had the ink dried on the final version of my manuscript sometime in mid-2005—although, of course it had been (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Paul Boghossian (2008). Replies to Wright, MacFarlane and Sosa. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 141 (3):409-432.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28. Paul Boghossian (2008). Epistemic Rules. Journal of Philosophy 105 (9):472-500.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  29. Paul Boghossian (2008). Epistemic Rules. Journal of Philosophy 105 (9):472-500.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  30. Paul A. Boghossian (2008). Content and Justification: Philosophical Papers. OUP Oxford.
    This volume presents a series of influential essays by Paul Boghossian on the theory of content and on its relation to the phenomenon of a priori knowledge. The essays are organized under four headings: the nature of content; content and self-knowledge; knowledge, content, and the a priori; and colour concepts.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  31. Paul A. Boghossian (2008). Epistemic Rules. Journal of Philosophy 105 (9):472-500.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Paul Boghossian (2007). Explaining Musical Experience. In Kathleen Stock (ed.), Philosophers on Music: Experience, Meaning, and Work. Oxford University Press
    1. I start with the observation that we often respond to a musical performance with emotion -- even if it is just the performance of a piece of absolute music, unaccompanied by text, title or programme. We can be exhilarated after a Rossini overture brought off with subtlety and panache; somber and melancholy after Furtlanger’s performance of the slow movement of the Eroica. And so forth. These emotions feel like the real thing to me – or anyway very close to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Paul Boghossian (2007). Music and the Emotions. In Kathleen Stock (ed.), Philosophers on Music: Experience, Meaning, and Work. Oxford University Press 117.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Paul Boghossian (2006). Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism: Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford University Press Uk.
    The academic world has been plagued in recent years by scepticism about truth and knowledge. Paul Boghossian, in his long-awaited first book, sweeps away relativist claims that there is no such thing as objective truth or knowledge, but only truth or knowledge from a particular perspective. He demonstrates clearly that such claims don't even make sense. Boghossian focuses on three different ways of reading the claim that knowledge is socially constructed - one as a thesis about truth and two about (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  35. Paul Boghossian (2006). What is Relativism? In Patrick Greenough & Michael Lynch (eds.), Truth and Relativism. Clarendon Press 13--37.
    Many philosophers, however, have been tempted to be relativists about specific domains of discourse, especially about those domains that have a normative character. Gilbert Harman, for example, has defended a relativistic view of morality, Richard Rorty a relativistic view of epistemic justification, and Crispin Wright a relativistic view of judgments of taste.¹ But what exactly is it to be a relativist about a given domain of discourse? The term ‘‘relativism’’ has, of course, been used in a bewildering variety of senses (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36. Paul Boghossian, Is Meaning Normative?
    in Christian Nimtz and Ansgar Beckermann (eds.): Philosophy - Science - Scientific Philosophy. Main Lectures and Colloquia of GAP.5, Fifth International Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy, Bielefeld, 2003, Mentis, 2005.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  37. Paul A. Boghossian (2005). Rules, Meaning and Intention – Discussion. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 124 (2):185 - 197.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38. Paul A. Boghossian (2005). Rules, Meaning and Intention – Discussion. Philosophical Studies 124 (2):185-197.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. P. Boghossian (2003). Contents and Norms. Philosophical Issues 13:31-45.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40. Paul Boghossian (2003). Blind Reasoning. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):225–248.
    The paper asks under what conditions deductive reasoning transmits justification from its premises to its conclusion. It argues that both standard externalist and standard internalist accounts of this phenomenon fail. The nature of this failure is taken to indicate the way forward: basic forms of deductive reasoning must justify by being instances of ‘blind but blameless’ reasoning. Finally, the paper explores the suggestion that an inferentialist account of the logical constants can help explain how such reasoning is possible.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   49 citations  
  41.  1
    Paul Boghossian (2003). I—Paul Boghossian. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):225-248.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Paul A. Boghossian (2003). Epistemic Analyticity: A Defense. Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):15-35.
    The paper is a defense of the project of explaining the a priori via the notion of meaning or concept possession. It responds to certain objections that have been made to this project—in particular, that there can be no epistemically analytic sentences that are not also metaphysically analytic, and that the notion of implicit definition cannot explain a priori entitlement. The paper goes on to distinguish between two different ways in which facts about meaning might generate facts about entitlement—inferential and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  43. Paul A. Boghossian (2003). The Normativity of Content. Philosophical Issues 13 (1):31-45.
  44. Paul A. Boghossian (2002). On Hearing the Music in the Sound: Scruton on Musical Expression. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (1):49–55.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  45. Paul A. Boghossian (2002). Seeking the Real. Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):223-38.
    A critical discussion of Barry Stroud's claim, in his book The Quest for Reality, that we could never rationally arrive at the conclusion that, for example, the world is not really colored.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46. Paul Boghossian (2001). How Are Objective Epistemic Reasons Possible? Philosophical Studies 106 (1-2):340-380.
    Epistemic relativism has the contemporary academy in its grip. Not merely in the United States, but seemingly everywhere, most scholars working in the humanities and the social sciences seem to subscribe to some form of it. Even where the label is repudiated, the view is embraced. Sometimes the relativism in question concerns truth, sometimes justification. The core impulse appears to be a relativism about knowledge. The suspicion is widespread that what counts as knowledge in one cultural, or broadly ideological, setting (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  47. Paul Boghossian (2001). Inference and Insight. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):633–640.
  48.  72
    Paul Boghossian (2001). The Gospel of Relaxation. The New Republic.
    Pragmatism is America’s distinctive contribution to the history of philosophical thought, though there has always been some dispute about exactly what doctrine it is supposed to name. The philosopher and psychologist William James, in a lecture given at Berkeley in 1898, attributed the view to..
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Paul Boghossian (2001). What is Social Construction? TLS.
    The core idea seems clear enough. To say of something that it is socially constructed is to emphasize its dependence on contingent aspects of our social selves. It is to say: This thing could not have existed had we not built it; and we need not have built it at all, at least not in its present form. Had we been a different kind of society, had we had different needs, values, or interests, we might well have built a different (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50. Paul Boghossian (2000). Knowledge of Logic. In Paul Boghossian & Christopher Peacocke (eds.), New Essays on the A Priori.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  51.  5
    Paul Boghossian (2000). The Problem Stated. In Paul Boghossian & Christopher Peacocke (eds.), New Essays on the a Priori. Oxford University Press 229.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  52. Paul Boghossian & Christopher Peacocke (eds.) (2000). New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford University Press.
    A stellar line-up of leading philosophers from around the world offer new treatments of a topic which has long been central to philosophical debate, and in ...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   33 citations  
  53. Paul Boghossian (1999). The Sokal Hoax. In Robert Klee (ed.), Scientific Inquiry: Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  54.  40
    Paul A. Boghossian (1998). Replies to Commentators. Philosophical Issues 9:253-260.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  55. Paul A. Boghossian (1998). What the Externalist Can Know "a Priori". Philosophical Issues 9 (2):197-211.
    Controversy continues to attach to the question whether an externalism about mental content is compatible with a traditional doctrine of privileged self-knowledge. By an externalism about mental content, I mean the view that what concepts our thoughts involve may depend not only on facts that are internal to us, but on facts about our environment. It is worth emphasizing, if only because it is still occasionally misperceived, that this thesis is supposed to apply at the level of sense and not (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  56.  25
    Paul Boghossian (1997). ** O Que o Embuste de Sokal Nos Deve Ensinar: As Consequências Perniciosas E as Contradições Internas Do Relativismo “Pós-Moderno”. Disputatio:1-14.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  57.  1
    Paul A. Boghossian (1997). IX-What the Externalist Can Know A Priori. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97 (2):161-175.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  58. Paul A. Boghossian (1997). What the Externalist Can Know A Priori. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97 (2):161-75.
    Controversy continues to attach to the question whether an externalism about mental content is compatible with a traditional doctrine of privileged self-knowledge. By an externalism about mental content, I mean the view that what concepts our thoughts involve may depend not only on facts that are internal to us, but on facts about our environment. It is worth emphasizing, if only because it is still occasionally misperceived, that this thesis is supposed to apply at the level of sense and not (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  59. Paul Boghossian (1996). What the Sokal Hoax Ought to Teach Us. Times Literary Supplement.
    In the autumn of 1994, New York University theoretical physicist, Alan Sokal, submitted an essay to Social Text , the leading journal in the field of cultural studies. Entitled Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity ," it purported to be a scholarly article about the "postmodern" philosophical and political implications of twentieth century physical theories. However, as the author himself later revealed in the journal Lingua Franca, his essay was merely a farrago of deliberately concocted solecisms, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  60. Paul A. Boghossian (1994). Analyticity and Conceptual Truth. Philosophical Issues 5:117-131.
  61. Paul A. Boghossian (1994). Inferential-Role Semantics and the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction. Philosophical Studies 73 (2-3):109-122.
    This is a critical discussion of Jerry Fodor and Ernie Lepore's "Holism". The paper questions the existence of a slippery slope from some inferential liaisons are constitutive of meaning' to all inferential liaisons are constitutive of meaning'. "Interalia", it defends the existence of an analytic/synthetic distinction.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  62.  19
    Paul A. Boghossian (1994). Review: Sense, Reference and Rule-Following. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (1):139 - 144.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  63. Paul A. Boghossian (1994). The Transparency of Mental Content. Philosophical Perspectives 8:33-50.
  64.  41
    Paul A. Boghossian (1993). Cognitive Science and the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction: Comments on Horwich. Philosophical Issues 3:135-142.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  65. Paul A. Boghossian (1993). Does an Inferential Role Semantics Rest Upon a Mistake? Mind and Language 8 (1):27-40.
  66.  78
    Paul A. Boghossian (1993). Sense, Reference and Rule-Following. [REVIEW] Philosophical Issues 4 (1):135-141.
    This is a critical discussion of Jerrold Katz's "The\nMetaphysics of Meaning". The essay raises some questions\nabout exactly how Katz's new intensionalism' is to be\nunderstood, and about its plausibility. It also questions\nthe views ability to solve the outstanding problems in the\nphilosophy of mind and language.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  67. Paul A. Boghossian (1992). Externalism and Inference. Philosophical Issues 2:11-28.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  68.  30
    Paul A. Boghossian (1992). Reply to Schiffer. Philosophical Issues 2:39-42.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  69. Paul A. Boghossian (1991). Naturalizing Content. In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell
  70. Paul A. Boghossian & J. David Velleman (1991). Physicalist Theories of Color. Philosophical Review 100 (January):67-106.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  71. Paul A. Boghossian (1990). The Status of Content. Philosophical Review 99 (2):157-84.
    A n irrealist conception of a given region of discourse is the view that no real properties answer to the central predicates of the region in question. Any such conception emerges, invariably, as the result of the interaction of two forces. An account of the meaning of the central predicates, along with a conception of the sorts of property the world may contain, conspire to show that, if the predicates of the region are taken to express properties, their extensions would (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   40 citations  
  72. Paul A. Boghossian (1990). The Status of Content Revisited. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 71 (December):264-278.
  73. Paul Boghossian (1989). Content and Self-Knowledge. Philosophical Topics 17 (1):5-26.
    This paper argues that, given a certain apparently inevitable thesis about content, we could not know our own minds. The thesis is that the content of a thought is determined by its relational properties.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   94 citations  
  74. Paul A. Boghossian (1989). Content and Self-Knowledge in Philosophy of Mind. Philosophical Topics 17 (1):5-26.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   85 citations  
  75. Paul A. Boghossian (1989). The Rule-Following Considerations. Mind 98 (392):507-49.
    I. Recent years have witnessed a great resurgence of interest in the writings of the later Wittgenstein, especially with those passages roughly, Philosophical Investigations p)I 38 — 242 and Remarks on the Foundations of mathematics, section VI that are concerned with the topic of rules. Much of the credit for all this excitement, unparalleled since the heyday of Wittgenstein scholarship in the early IIJ6os, must go to Saul Kripke's I4rittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. It is easy to explain why. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   94 citations  
  76. Paul A. Boghossian & J. David Velleman (1989). Color as a Secondary Quality. Mind 98 (January):81-103.
  77. Paul Boghossian, Does Philosophy Matter? -- It Would Appear So. A Reply to Fish.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  78.  6
    Paul A. Boghossian & J. David Velleman, Colour as a Secondard Quality.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  79.  5
    Paul A. Boghossian & J. David Velleman, Physicalist Theories of Color.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
Is this list right?