John Greco Saint Louis University
Contact
  • No contact info.

Affiliations
  • Faculty, Saint Louis University
  • PhD, Brown University, 1989.

Areas of specialization

Areas of interest

My philosophical views

Edited categories

blank
About me
Not much to say..
My works
96 items found.
Sort by:
  1. John Greco & David Henderson (eds.) (Forthcoming). Epistemic Evaluation: Point and Purpose in Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. David Henderson & John Greco (eds.) (forthcoming). Epistemic Evaluation: Point and Purpose in Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. J. Greco (2014). Pritchard's Epistemological Disjunctivism: How Right? How Radical? How Satisfying? Philosophical Quarterly 64 (254):115-122.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John Greco (2013). Reflective Knowledge and the Pyrrhonian Problematic. In John Turri (ed.), Virtuous Thoughts: The Philosophy of Ernest Sosa. Springer. 179--191.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John Greco (2012). Recent Work on Testimonial Knowledge. American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (1):15-28.
    -/- Recent interest in the epistemology of testimony can be traced to C. A. J. Coady's Testimony: A Philosophical Study (1992) and then a collection of papers edited by Bimal Krishna Matilal and Arindam Chakrabarti, Knowing from Words (1994). These two volumes framed several issues in the epistemology of testimony and largely set the agenda for work in that area over the next two decades. -/- One major issue in this literature is whether testimonial knowledge can be "reduced" to some (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. John Greco (2012). A (Different) Virtue Epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):1-26.
    Section 1 articulates a genus-species claim: that knowledge is a kind of success from ability. Equivalently: In cases of knowledge, S’s success in believing the truth is attributable to S’s ability. That idea is then applied to questions about the nature and value of knowledge. Section 2 asks what it would take to turn the genus-species claim into a proper theory of knowledge; that is, into informative, necessary and sufficient conditions. That question is raised in the context of an important (...)
    Direct download (15 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. John Greco (2012). A (Different) Virtue Epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):1-26.
    Section 1 articulates a genus-species claim: that knowledge is a kind of success from ability. Equivalently: In cases of knowledge, S’s success in believing the truth is attributable to S’s ability. That idea is then applied to questions about the nature and value of knowledge. Section 2 asks what it would take to turn the genus-species claim into a proper theory of knowledge; that is, into informative, necessary and sufficient conditions. That question is raised in the context of an important (...)
    Direct download (15 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ruth Groff & John Greco (eds.) (2012). Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism. Routledge.
    The book will be of interest to philosophers working in any of these areas, as well as to historians of philosophy, political theorists and critical realists.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. John Greco (2011). 10.1 Evidentialism About Knowledge. In T. Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press. 167.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John Greco (2011). Evidentialism About Knowledge. In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. John Greco (2011). Epistemic Circularity: Vicious, Virtuous and Benign. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 1 (2):105-112.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John Greco & John Turri (2011). Virtue Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. John Greco (2010). Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: Preface; Part I. Epistemic Normativity: 1. Knowledge as success from ability; 2. Against deontology; 3. Against internalism; 4. Against evidentialism; Part II. Problems for Everyone: 5. The nature of knowledge; 6. The value of knowledge; 7. Knowledge and context; 8. The Pyrrhonian problematic; Part III. Problems for Reliabilism: 9. The problem of strange and fleeting processes; 10. The problem of defeating evidence; 11. The problem of easy knowledge; Bibliography; Index.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John Greco (2010). A Virtue Epistemology. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3):399-401.
    Section 1 articulates a genus-species claim: that knowledge is a kind of success from ability. Equivalently: In cases of knowledge, S’s success in believing the truth is attributable to S’s ability. That idea is then applied to questions about the nature and value of knowledge. Section 2 asks what it would take to turn the genus-species claim into a proper theory of knowledge; that is, into informative, necessary and sufficient conditions. That question is raised in the context of an important (...)
    Direct download (16 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. John Greco (2009). Epistemic Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. John Greco (2009). Knowledge and Success From Ability. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):17 - 26.
    This paper argues that knowledge is an instance of a more general and familiar normative kind—that of success through ability (or success through excellence, or success through virtue). This thesis is developed in the context of three themes prominent in the recent literature: that knowledge attributions are somehow context sensitive; that knowledge is intimately related to practical reasoning; and that one purpose of the concept of knowledge is to flag good sources of information. Wedding these themes to the proposed account (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. John Greco (2009). Religious Knowledge in the Context of Conflicting Testimony. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:61-76.
    An adequate account of testimonial knowledge in general explains how religious knowledge can be grounded in testimony, and even in the context of conflicting testimonial traditions. Three emerging trends in epistemology help to make that case. The first is to make a distinction between two projects of epistemology: “the project of explanation” and “the project of vindication.” The second is to emphasize a distinction between knowledge and understanding. The third is to ask what role the concept of knowledge plays in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. John Greco (2009). Skepticism and Internalism. Iris 1 (2):429-438.
    This paper explores a familiar skeptical problematic and considers some strategies for responding to it. Section 1 reconstructs and disambiguates the skeptical problematic, distinguishing between some importantly different lines of skeptical reasoning. Section 2 distinguishes two kinds of anti-skeptical strategy. “Cooperative strategies” accept the conditions on knowledge that are laid down by a target skeptical argument, and argue that those conditions can be satisfied in a relevant domain. “Critical strategies” respond to a skeptical argument by rejecting some condition on knowledge (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. John Greco (2009). The Value Problem. In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Epistemic Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 313--22.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Daniel Breyer & John Greco (2008). Cognitive Integration and the Ownership of Belief: Response to Bernecker. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1):173–184.
    This paper responds to Sven Bernecker’s argument that agent reliabilism cannot accommodate internalist intuitions about clarvoyance cases. In section 1 we clarify a version of agent reliabilism and Bernecker’s objections against it. In section 2 we say more about how the notion of cognitive integration helps to adjudicate clairvoyance cases and other proposed counterexamples to reliabilism. The central idea is that cognitive integration underwrites a kind of belief ownership, which in turn underwrites the sort of responsibility for belief required for (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. John Greco (2008). Cognitive Integration and the Ownership of Belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1):173-184.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. John Greco (2008). Skepticism About the External World. In , The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press. 108--128.
  23. John Greco (ed.) (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press.
    In the history of philosophical thought, few themes loom as large as skepticism. Skepticism has been the most visible and important part of debates about knowledge. Skepticism at its most basic questions our cognitive achievements, challenges our ability to obtain reliable knowledge; casting doubt on our attempts to seek and understand the truth about everything from ethics, to other minds, religious belief, and even the underlying structure of matter and reality. Since Descartes, the defense of knowledge against skepticism has been (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. John Greco (2008). What's Wrong with Contextualism? Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):416 - 436.
    This paper addresses two worries that might be raised about contextualism in epistemology and that carry over to its moral analogues: that contextualism robs epistemology (and moral theory) of a proper subject-matter, and that contextualism robs knowledge claims (and moral claims) of their objectivity. Two theses are defended: (1) that these worries are appropriately directed at interestdependent theories in general rather than at contextualism in particular, and (2) that the two worries are over-stated in any case. Finally, the paper offers (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. J. Greco (2007). The Purpose of Knowledge and the Nature of Ability. Philosophical Issues 17 (1):57-69.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. John Greco (2007). Discrimination and Testimonial Knowledge. Episteme 4 (3):335-351.
    Sanford Goldberg has called our attention to an interesting problem: How is it that young children can learn from the testimony of their caregivers (their parents, teachers, and nannies, for example) even when the children themselves are undiscriminating consumers of testimony? Part One describes the importance and scope of the problem, showing that it generalizes beyond tots and their caregivers. Part Two considers and rejects several strategies for solving the problem, including Goldberg's own. Part Three defends a solution, positing a (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John Greco (2007). External World Skepticism. Philosophy Compass 2 (4):625–649.
    Recent literature in epistemology has focused on the following argument for skepticism (SA): I know that I have two hands only if I know that I am not a handless brain in a vat. But I don't know I am not a handless brain in a vat. Therefore, I don't know that I have two hands. Part I of this article reviews two responses to skepticism that emerged in the 1980s and 1990s: sensitivity theories and attributor contextualism. Part II considers (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. John Greco (2007). Knowledge as Credit for True Belief. In Michael DePaul & Linda Zagzebski (eds.), Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives From Ethics and Epistemology. Clarendon Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. John Greco (2007). Reformed Epistemology. In P. Copan & C. Meister (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Routledge. 629--639.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. John Greco (2007). The Nature of Ability and the Purpose of Knowledge. Philosophical Issues 17 (1):57–69.
    The claim that knowledge is a kind of success from ability has great theoretical power: it explains the nature of epistemic normativity, why knowledge is incompatible with luck, and why knowledge is more valuable than mere true belief. This paper addresses objections to the view by wedding it with two additional ideas: that intellectual abilities display a certain structure, and that the concept of knowledge functions to flag good information, and good sources of information, for use in practical reasoning.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. John Greco (2007). Worries About Pritchard's Safety. Synthese 158 (3):299 - 302.
    I take issue with two claims that Duncan Pritchard makes in his recent book, Epistemic Luck. The first concerns his safety-based response to the lottery problem; the second his account of the relationship between safety and intellectual virtue.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Mark Timmons, John Greco & Alfred R. Mele (eds.) (2007). Rationality and the Good: Critical Essays on the Ethics and Epistemology of Robert Audi. Oxford University Press.
    For over thirty years, Robert Audi has produced important work in ethics, epistemology, and the theory of action. This volume features thirteen new critical essays on Audi by a distinguished group of authors: Fred Adams, William Alston, Laurence BonJour, Roger Crisp, Elizabeth Fricker, Bernard Gert, Thomas Hurka, Hugh McCann, Al Mele, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Raimo Tuomela, Candace Vogler, and Timothy Williamson. Audi's introductory essay provides a thematic overview interconnecting his views in ethics, epistemology, and philosophy of action. The volume concludes with (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. John Corcoran, Stephen F. Barker, Eric Dayton, John Greco, Naomi Zack, Richard S. Robin, Joel Isaac & Murray G. Murphey (2006). A Symposium on Murray G. Murphey, CI Lewis: The Last Great Pragmatist. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):1-77.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. John Greco (2006). How to Be a Pragmatist: C. I. Lewis and Humean Skepticism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):24-31.
    Murray G. Murphey’s masterful treatment of C. I. Lewis’s philosophy leaves two things amply clear: first, that Lewis struggled with skeptical arguments from Hume throughout his career; and second, that Lewis never adequately resolved the problems raised by those arguments. In this paper I will consider Lewis’s approach to Hume’s skepticism in Mind and the World Order (MWO) and in An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation (AKV), and I will argue that Lewis’s reply to Hume in these works did not (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. John Greco (2006). Virtue, Luck and the Pyrrhonian Problematic. Philosophical Studies 130 (1):9--34.
    A number of contemporary philosophers endorse a Pyrrhonian theme: that one has knowledge only if one knows or understands that one’s beliefs are reliably formed. Otherwise, one is like a man who grasps gold in the dark: such a man is successful, but his success is a matter of luck, and so not creditable to him. It is argued that the skeptical problem and the problem of moral luck share a common structure and a common solution. Specifically, a virtue-theoretic approach (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. William P. Alston, Laurence Bonjour, Carl Ginet, Alvin I. Goldman, John Greco, George I. Mavrodes, Philip L. Quinn, Alessandra Tanesini, Nicholas Wolterstorff & Linda Zagzebski (2005). Perspectives on the Philosophy of William P. Alston. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. John Greco (2005). Evidentialism. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (4):556-558.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. John Greco (2005). Justification is Not Internal. In Steup Matthias & Sosa Ernest (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Blackwell. 257--269.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. John Greco (2005). Review of Joseph Houston: Thomas Reid: Context, Influence, Significance. [REVIEW] Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3 (2):186-190.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. John Greco (2005). Review of Noah Lemos, Common Sense: A Contemporary Defense. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (7).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. John Greco (2005). Thomas Reid: Context, Influence, Significance. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3 (2):186-190.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. John Greco (2004). A Different Sort of Contextualism. Erkenntnis 61 (2-3):383 - 400.
    A number of virtue epistemologists endorse the following thesis: Knowledge is true belief resulting from intellectual virtue, where Ss true belief results from intellectual virtue just in case S believes the truth because S is intellectually virtuous. This thesis commits one to a sort of contextualism about knowledge attributions. This is because, in general, sentences of the form X occurred because Y occurred require a contextualist treatment. This sort of contextualism is contrasted with more familiar versions. It is argued that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. John Greco (2004). Externalism and Skepticism. In Richard Schantz (ed.), The Externalist Challenge. De Gruyter. 53.
    Part 1 argues that, despite rhetorical appearances, McDowell accepts a standard version of epistemic externalism. Moreover, epistemic externalism plays an important role in McDowell’s response to skepticism. Part 2 argues that, contra McDowell, epistemic externalism is necessary for rejecting skepticism, and content externalism is not sufficient for rejecting skepticism.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. John Greco (2004). Epistemic Justification. Faith and Philosophy 21 (4):547-549.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. John Greco (ed.) (2004). Ernest Sosa and His Critics. Blackwell Pub..
  46. John Greco (2004). How to Preserve Your Virtue While Losing Your Perspective. In Greco John (ed.), Ernest Sosa and His Critics. 96--105.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. John Greco (2004). 5 Reid's Reply to the Skeptic. In Terence Cuneo Rene van Woudenberg (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid. Cambridge University Press. 134.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. John Greco (2004). Review: Skepticism: The Major Issues. [REVIEW] Mind 113 (452):766-768.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. John Greco (ed.) (2004). Ernest Sosa and His Critics. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  50. John Greco (2003). Further Thoughts on Agent Reliabilism: Replies to Cohen, Geivett, Kvanvig, and Schmitt and Lahroodi. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):466–480.
    This paper replies to various concerns raised in a symposium on Putting Skeptics in Their Place: The Nature of Skeptical Arguments and Their Role in Philosophical Inquiry.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  51. John Greco (2003). Further Thoughts on Agent Reliabilism. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):466-480.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  52. John Greco (2003). ``Knowledge as Credit for True Belief&Quot;. In Michael DePaul & Linda Zagzebski (eds.), Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives From Ethics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 111-134.
    The paper begins by reviewing two problems for fallibilism: the lottery problem, or the problem of explaining why fallible evidence, though otherwise excellent, is not enough to know that one will lose the lottery, and Gettier problems. It is then argued that both problems can be resolved if we note an important illocutionary force of knowledge attributions: namely, that when we attribute knowledge to someone we mean to give the person credit for getting things right. Alternatively, to say that a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  53. John Greco (2003). Précis of Putting Skeptics in Their Place: The Nature of Skeptical Arguments and Their Role in Philosophical Inquiry. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):432–436.
  54. John Greco (2003). 22. Virtues in Epistemology. In Steven Luper (ed.), Essential Knowledge: Readings in Epistemology. Longman. 211.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  55. John Greco (2003). Why Not Reliabilism? In Olsson Erik (ed.), The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer. Kluwer. 31--41.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  56. John Greco (2003). Virtue and Luck, Epistemic and Otherwise. Metaphilosophy 34 (3):353-366.
    This essay defends virtue reliabilism against a line of argument put forward by Duncan Pritchard. In the process, it discusses (1) the motivations for virtue reliabilism, (2) some analogies between epistemic virtue and moral virtue, and (3) the relation between virtue (epistemic and otherwise) and luck (epistemic and otherwise). It argues that considerations about virtue and luck suggest a solution to Gettier problems from the perspective of a virtue theory.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  57. John Greco (2002). How to Reid Moore. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):544-563.
    Moore's 'Proof of an External World' has evoked a variety of responses from philosophers, including bafflement, indignation and sympathetic reconstruction. I argue that Moore should be understood as following Thomas Reid on a variety of points, both epistemological and methodological. Moreover, Moore and Reid are exactly right on all of these points. Hence what I present is a defence of Moore's 'Proof', as well as an interpretation. Finally, I argue that the Reid-Moore position is useful for resolving an issue that (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  58. John Greco (2002). Review: The Price of Doubt. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (441):149-152.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  59. John Greco (2002). The Price of Doubt. Mind 111 (441):149-152.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  60. John Greco (2002). ``Virtues in Epistemology&Quot;. In Paul Moser (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press. 287--315.
    Part One reviews some recent history of epistemology, focusing on ways in which the intellectual virtues have been invoked to solve specific epistemological problems. This part gives a sense of the contemporary landscape that has emerged and clarifies some of the disagreements among those who invoke the virtues in epistemology. Part Two explores some problems about knowledge in greater detail, and defends a externalist approach in virtue epistemology.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  61. John Greco (2001). Virtues and Rules in Epistemology. In Abrol Fairweather & Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski (eds.), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility. Oxford University Press. 117--141.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  62. John Greco (2001). Warranted Christian Belief. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75 (3):461-466.
  63. Lawrence BonJour, Jonathan Dancy, Julia Driver, Alvin Goldman, John Greco & Christopher Hookway (2000). Guy Axtell has Taught Philosophy at the University of Nevada, Reno, Since Receiving His Ph. D. In 1991. He has Written Articles on Epistemology, Philosophy of Science, American Pragmatism, and Philosophy of Religion. He is Currently at Work on a Book Entitled Pragmatic Pluralism: Understanding Philosophical Diversity. [REVIEW] In Guy Axtell (ed.), Knowledge, Belief, and Character: Readings in Virtue Epistemology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  64. Alvin Goldman, Ernest Sosa, Hilary Kornblith, John Greco, Jonathan Dancy, Laurence Bonjour, Linda Zagrebsky, Julia Driver, James Montmarquet, Chirstopher Hookway, Ricard Paul, Guy Axtell & Casey Swank (2000). Knowledge, Belief, and Character: Readings in Contemporary Virtue Epistemology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  65. John Greco (2000). Escepticismo y géneros epistémicos: comentarios sobre Christopher Hookway. Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 19 (3):183-193.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  66. John Greco (2000). Putting Skeptics in Their Place: The Nature of Skeptical Arguments and Their Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Cambridge University Press.
    This book is about the nature of skeptical arguments and their role in philosophical inquiry. John Greco delineates three main theses: that a number of historically prominent skeptical arguments make no obvious mistake, and therefore cannot be easily dismissed; that the analysis of skeptical arguments is philosophically useful and important, and should therefore have a central place in the methodology of philosophy; and that taking skeptical arguments seriously requires us to adopt an externalist, reliabilist epistemology. Greco argues that the importance (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  67. John Greco (2000). Review: Two Kinds of Intellectual Virtue. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):179 - 184.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  68. John Greco (2000). Skepticism, Reliabilism, and Virtue Epistemology. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:139-147.
    I review a familiar skeptical argument from Hume, and conclude that it requires us to accept that there is no necessary relation between beliefs about the world and their evidential grounds; that is, there is no logical or quasi-logical relation between empirical beliefs and their grounds, such that their grounds entail them, or even make them probable. I then argue that generic reliabilism can accommodate this fact about evidential grounds in a non-skeptical way. According to reliabilism, the grounds for our (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  69. John Greco (2000). ``Two Kinds of Intellectual Virtue&Quot;. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):179--184.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  70. John Greco (2000). Scepticism and Epistemic Kinds. Noûs 34 (s1):366 - 376.
    This paper responds to a claim by Christopher Hookway, that Fumerton’s Principle of Inferential Justification (PIJ) is a platitude, and that skeptical arguments that deploy it depend essentially on a substantive thesis about the nature of epistemic kinds. This paper argues that, contrary to Hookway, the thesis about epistemic kinds is not necessary to generate skeptical results, and PIJ is sufficient to do so.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  71. John Greco (1999). Agent Reliabilism. Philosophical Perspectives 13 (s13):273-296.
    This paper reviews two skeptical arguments and argues that a reliabilist framework is necessary to avoid them. The paper also argues that agent reliabilism, which makes the knower the seat of reliability, is the most plausible version of reliabilism.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  72. John Greco (1999). ``Agent Reliabilism&Quot. In James Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspecives. Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview Publishing Co..
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  73. John Greco (1999). Skepticism and the Modern Ontology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 73:217-228.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  74. John Greco & Ernest Sosa (eds.) (1999). The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Blackwell.
    Written by an international assembly of leading philosophers, this volume includes seventeen newly-commissioned full-length survey articles on the central ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  75. John Greco (1998). A Realist Conception of Truth. International Philosophical Quarterly 38 (3):313-317.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  76. John Greco (1998). Foundationalism and Philosophy of Religion. In Brian Davies (ed.), Philosophy of Religion: A Guide to the Subject. Georgetown University Press. 35.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  77. John Greco (1998). Perception as Interpretation. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 72:229-237.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  78. John Greco (1998). The Force of Hume's Skepticism About Unobserved Matters of Fact. Journal of Philosophical Research 23:289-306.
    According to a popular objection, Hume assumes that only deductive inferences can generate knowledge and reasonable belief, and so Hume’s skepticism can be avoided by simply recognizing the role of inductive inferences in empirical matters. This paper offers an interpretation of Hume’s skepticism that avoids this objection. The resulting skeptical argument is a powerful one in the following sense: it is not at all obvious where the argument goes wrong, and responding to the argument forces us to adopt a substantive (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  79. John Greco (1997). Catholics Vs. Calvinists on Religious Knowledge. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 71 (1):13-34.
  80. John Greco (1997). Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. International Philosophical Quarterly 37 (1):115-119.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  81. John Greco (1996). Evidence and Inquiry. International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (2):231-234.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  82. John Greco (1995). Modern Ontology and the Problems of Epistemology. American Philosophical Quarterly 32 (3):241 - 251.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  83. John Greco (1995). Reid's Critique of Berkeley and Hume: What's the Big Idea? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):279-296.
    Reid thought that the linchpin of his response to\nskepticism was his rejection of the theory of ideas. I\nargue that Reid's assessment of his own work is incorrect;\nthe theory of ideas plays no important role in at least one\nof Berkeley's and Hume's arguments for skepticism, and\nrejecting the theory is therefore neither necessary nor\nsufficient as a reply to that argument. Reid does in fact\nanswer the argument, but with his theory of evidence rather\nthan his rejection of the theory of ideas.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  84. John Greco (1995). Speaking of a Personal God. Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):148-153.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  85. John Greco (1995). Warrant. International Philosophical Quarterly 35 (1):109-112.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  86. John Greco (1995). A Second Paradox Concerning Responsibility and Luck. Metaphilosophy 26 (1-2):81-96.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  87. John Greco (1994). The Intellectual Virtues and the Life of the Mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):973-976.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  88. John Greco (1994). Virtue Epistemology and the Relevant Sense of “Relevant Possibility”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):61-77.
    In this paper I defend a relevant possibilities approach against a familiar kind of skepticism, and I argue that virtue epistemology can provide a theoretical grounding for the kind of solutions that is offered. In the section that follows I outline both the skeptical problems and the solution. In the remaining sections I develop the proposal in more detail. If my argument is sound then the paper also constitutes an argument in favor of virtue epistemology.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  89. John Greco (1993). ``Virtues and Vices of Virtue Epistemology&Quot;. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):413--432.
  90. John Greco (1993). How to Beat a Sceptic Without Begging the Question. Ratio 6 (1):1-15.
    In this paper I offer a solution to scepticism about the world which neither embraces idealism, nor ends in a stalemate, nor begs the question against the sceptic. In the first part of the paper I explicate the sceptical argument and try to show why it has real force. In the next part of the paper I propose a version of the relevant possibilities approach to scepticism. The central claim of the proposed solution is that a sceptical possibility undermines knowledge (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  91. John Greco (1992). A Companion to Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  92. John Greco (1992). ``Virtue Epistemology&Quot. In A Companion to Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  93. John Greco (1991). Sense and Certainty, by Marie McGinn. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (3):689-693.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  94. John Greco (1990). Internalism and Epistemically Responsible Belief. Synthese 85 (2):245 - 277.
    In section one the deontological (or responsibilist) conception of justification is discussed and explained. In section two, arguments are put forward in order to derive the most plausible version of perspectival internalism, or the position that epistemic justification is a function of factors internal to the believer's cognitive perspective. The two most common considerations put forward in favor of perspectival internalism are discussed. These are the responsibilist conception of justification, and the intuition that two believers with like beliefs and experiences (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  95. John Greco (1988). Plantinga, Foundationalism, and the Charge of Self-Referential Incoherence. Grazer Philosophische Studien 31:187-193.
    Alvin Plantinga charges classical foundationalism with self-referential incoherence, meaning that that doctrine employs criteria for rationally acceptable propositions which exclude the criteria themselves. More specifically, the charge is that the criteria are neither properly basic nor supported by properly basic propositions. In section 1 the doctrine of classical foundationalism is briefly explained. In section 2, a defense against Plantinga's objection is provided showing how the foundationalist can provide arguments which ground the criteria in question in properly basic propositions.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  96. John Greco (1987). A Reply to Strouds Skeptic. Philosophical Papers 16 (1):23-39.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
Is this list right?