Karen Detlefsen University of Pennsylvania
Contact

Affiliations
  • Faculty, University of Pennsylvania

Areas of specialization

Areas of interest

blank
About me
Not much to say..
My works
30 items found.
Order:
  1.  15
    Jacqueline Broad & Karen Detlefsen (forthcoming). Women and Liberty, 1600-1800: Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
    This book addresses the theme of liberty as it is found in the writing of women philosophers of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, or as it is theorized with respect to women and their lives. It covers both theoretical and practical philosophy, with chapters grappling with problems in the metaphysics of free will (both human and God’s), the liberty (or lack thereof) of women in their moral, personal lives as well as their social-political, public lives, and the interactions between the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  10
    Karen Detlefsen (forthcoming). Cartesianism and its Feminist Promise and Limits: The Case of Mary Astell. In Catherine Wilson & Stephen Gaukroger (eds.), Mind and Nature in Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford University Press
    In this paper, I consider Mary Astell's contributions to the history of feminism, noting her grounding in and departure from Cartesianism and its relation to women.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  9
    Karen Detlefsen (forthcoming). Du Châtelet and Descartes on the Role of Hypothesis and Metaphysics in Science. In Eileen O'Neill & Marcy Lascano (eds.), Feminism and the History of Philosophy. Kluwer
    In this chapter, I examine similarities and divergences between Du Châtelet and Descartes on their endorsement of the use of hypotheses in science, using the work of Condillac to locate them in his scheme of systematizers. I conclude that, while Du Châtelet is still clearly a natural philosopher, as opposed to modern scientist, her conception of hypotheses is considerably more modern than is Descartes’, a difference that finds its roots in their divergence on the nature of first principles.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  9
    Karen Detlefsen (forthcoming). Women, Liberty, and Forms of Feminism. In Jacqueline Broad & Karen Detlefsen (eds.), Women and Liberty, 1600-1800: Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press
    This chapter shows how Mary Astell and Margaret Cavendish can reasonably be understood as early feminists in three senses of the term. First, they are committed to the natural equality of men and women, and related, they are committed to equal opportunity of education for men and women. Second, they are committed to social structures that help women develop authentic selves and thus autonomy understood in one sense of the word. Third, they acknowledge the power of production relationships, especially friendships (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Karen Detlefsen (2016). Custom Freedom and Equality: Mary Astell on Marriage and Women's Education. In Penny Weiss & Alice Sowaal (eds.), Feminist Interpretations of Mary Astell. Penn State University Press 74-92.
    Whatever may be said about contemporary feminists’ evaluation of Descartes’ role in the history of feminism, Mary Astell herself believed that Descartes’ philosophy held tremendous promise for women. His urging all people to eschew the tyranny of custom and authority in order to uncover the knowledge that could be found in each one of our unsexed souls potentially offered women a great deal of intellectual and personal freedom and power. Certainly Astell often read Descartes in this way, and Astell herself (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  4
    Karen Detlefsen (2016). Descartes on the Theory of Life and Methodology in the Life Sciences. In Peter Distelzweig & Evan Ragland (eds.), Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy. Springer 141-72.
    As a practicing life scientist, Descartes must have a theory of what it means to be a living being. In this paper, I provide an account of what his theoretical conception of living bodies must be. I then show that this conception might well run afoul of his rejection of final causal explanations in natural philosophy. Nonetheless, I show how Descartes might have made use of such explanations as merely hypothetical, even though he explicitly blocks this move. I conclude by (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  11
    Karen Detlefsen (2016). Review of Historical Dictionary of Descartes and Cartesian Philosophy . 2nd Ed. [REVIEW] Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (2):345-48.
  8.  4
    Karen Detlefsen (2015). Book Review of Desmond M. Clarke, The Equality of the Sexes: Three Feminist Texts of the Seventeenth Century. [REVIEW] Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  12
    Karen Detlefsen (2015). Eric Watkins, Ed.The Divine Order, the Human Order, and the Order of Nature: Historical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. 272. $74.00. [REVIEW] Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (1):187-190.
  10. Karen Detlefsen (2014). Biology and Theology in Malebranche's Theory of Organic Generation. In Ohad Nachtomy & Justin E. H. Smith (eds.), The Life Sciences in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford University Press 137-156.
    This paper has two parts: In the first part, I give a general survey of the various reasons 17th and 18th century life scientists and metaphysicians endorsed the theory of pre-existence according to which God created all living beings at the creation of the universe, and no living beings are ever naturally generated anew. These reasons generally fall into three categories. The first category is theological. For example, many had the desire to account for how all humans are stained by (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Karen Detlefsen (2013). Emilie du Châtelet Between Leibniz and Newton. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (1):207-209.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 21, Issue 1, Page 207-209, January 2013.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Karen Detlefsen (2013). Emilie Du Châtelet: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    A survey article on the metaphysics, physics and methodology of Du Châtelet.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Karen Detlefsen (2013). Teleology and Natures in Descartes' Sixth Meditation. In Descartes' Meditations: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press 153-176.
    In this paper, I consider Descartes’ Sixth Meditation dropsy passage on the difference between the human body considered in itself and the human composite of mind and body. I do so as a way of illuminating some features of Descartes’ broader thinking about teleology, including the role of teleological explanations in physiology. I use the writings on teleology of some ancient authors for the conceptual (but not historical) help they can provide in helping us to think about the Sixth Meditation (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  23
    Karen Detlefsen (ed.) (2012). Descartes' Meditations: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
    Descartes' Meditations, one of the most influential works in western philosophy, continues to provoke discussion and debate. This volume of original essays by leading established and emerging early modern scholars ranges over all six of the Meditations and explores issues such as scepticism, judgement, causation, the nature of meditation and the meditator's relation to God, the nature of personhood, Descartes' theory of sense perception and his ideas on the nature of substance. The contributors bring new insights to both central and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Karen Detlefsen (2012). Margaret Cavendish and Thomas Hobbes on Freedom, Education, and Women. In Nancy J. Hirschmann & Joanne H. Wright (eds.), Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes. The Pennsylvania State University Press 149-168.
    In this paper, I argue that Margaret Cavendish’s account of freedom, and the role of education in freedom, is better able to account for the specifics of women’s lives than are Thomas Hobbes’ accounts of these topics. The differences between the two is grounded in their differing conceptions of the metaphysics of human nature, though the full richness of Cavendish’s approach to women, their minds and their freedom can be appreciated only if we take account of her plays, accepting them (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  2
    Karen Detlefsen (2011). Review of Catherine Wilson and Desmond M. Clarke (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Karen Detlefsen (2009). Margaret Cavendish on the Relation Between God and World. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):421-438.
    It has often been noted that Margaret Cavendish discusses God in her writings on natural philosophy far more than one might think she ought to given her explicit claim that a study of God belongs to theology which is to be kept strictly separate from studies in natural philosophy. In this article, I examine one way in which God enters substantially into her natural philosophy, namely the role he plays in her particular version of teleology. I conclude that, while Cavendish (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18. Karen Detlefsen (2007). Reason and Freedom: Margaret Cavendish on the Order and Disorder of Nature. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (2):157-191.
    According to Margaret Cavendish the entire natural world is essentially rational such that everything thinks in some way or another. In this paper, I examine why Cavendish would believe that the natural world is ubiquitously rational, arguing against the usual account, which holds that she does so in order to account for the orderly production of very complex phenomena (e.g. living beings) given the limits of the mechanical philosophy. Rather, I argue, she attributes ubiquitous rationality to the natural world in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  19. Karen Detlefsen (2006). Atomism, Monism, and Causation in the Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 3 (199):240.
    Between 1653 and 1655 Margaret Cavendish makes a radical transition in her theory of matter, rejecting her earlier atomism in favour of an infinitely-extended and infinitely-divisible material plenum, with matter being ubiquitously self-moving, sensing, and rational. It is unclear, however, if Cavendish can actually dispense of atomism. One of her arguments against atomism, for example, depends upon the created world being harmonious and orderly, a premise Cavendish herself repeatedly undermines by noting nature’s many disorders. I argue that her supposed difficulties (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  20.  65
    Karen Detlefsen (2006). Descartes's Method of Doubt Janet Broughton Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002, Xv + 217 Pp., $16.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Dialogue 45 (2):404.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Karen Detlefsen (2006). Explanation and Demonstration in the Haller-Wolff Debate. In Justin E. H. Smith (ed.), The Problem of Animal Generation in Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press
    The theories of pre-existence and epigenesis are typically taken to be opposing theories of generation in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. One can be a pre-existence theorist only if one does not espouse epigenesis and vice versa. It has also been recognized, however, that the line between pre-existence and epigenesis in the nineteenth century, at least, is considerably less sharp and clear than it was in earlier centuries. The debate (1759-1777) between Albrecht von Haller and Caspar Friedrich Wolff on their (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  13
    Karen Detlefsen (2006). Review of Desmond M. Clarke, Descartes: A Biography. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (11).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  42
    Karen Detlefsen (2005). Review of Sarah Hutton, Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (7).
  24.  13
    Karen Detlefsen (2004). Critical Notice. Philosophical Inquiry 26 (4):131-138.
    Critical notice of Jacqueline Broad's Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century (CUP, 2002).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  41
    Karen Detlefsen (2003). Supernaturalism, Occasionalism, and Preformation in Malebranche. Perspectives on Science 11 (4):443-483.
    Malebranche is both an occasionalist and an advocate of the preformationist theory of generation. One might expect this given that he is a mechanist: passive matter cannot be the source of its own motion and so requires God to move it (occasionalism); and such matter, moving according to a few simple laws of motion, could never fashion something as complex as a living being, and so organisms must be fashioned by God at Creation (preformationism). This expectation finds a challenge in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  50
    Karen Detlefsen (2002). JA Cover and John O'Leary-Hawthorne, Substance and Individuation in Leibniz Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 22 (1):19-21.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  21
    Karen Detlefsen (2002). Review of Margaret Cavendish, Observations Upon Experimental Philosophy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (7).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  46
    Karen Detlefsen (2000). Susan Bordo, Ed., Feminist Interpretations of René Descartes Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 20 (2):87-89.
  29.  12
    Karen Detlefsen (1998). Diversity and the Individual in Dewey's Philosophy of Democratic Education. Educational Theory 48 (3):309-329.
  30.  35
    Karen Detlefsen (1998). Helmut Müller-Sievers, Self-Generation: Biology, Philosophy, and Literature Around 1800 Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 18 (4):285-287.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
Is this list right?