Kenneth Winkler Yale University
Contact
  • No contact info.

Affiliations
  • Faculty, Yale University

Areas of specialization
  • None specified

Areas of interest

blank
About me
Not much to say..
My works
37 items found.
Order:
  1. Kenneth P. Winkler (2016). Van Cleve and Reid on Conceptions and Qualities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (1):225-231.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  28
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2014). Berkeley's Idealism: A Critical Examination. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 123 (4):541-544.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  27
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2011). Continuous Creation1. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35 (1):287-309.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4. Kenneth P. Winkler (2011). Hume and the Sensible Qualities. In Lawrence Nolan (ed.), Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Kenneth P. Winkler (2010). Kant, the Empiricists, and the Enterprise of Deduction. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  39
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2010). P.J.E. Kail's Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 51 (3):144-159.
  7.  20
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2009). Early Modern Intentionalism: Replies to LoLordo's Comments. Philosophia 37 (3):507-509.
    I clarify Locke’s intentionalism and explain what we might gain by paying more attention to the role of linguistic intentions in the work of the British empiricists.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  41
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2009). Signification, Intention, Projection. Philosophia 37 (3):477-501.
    Locke is what present-day aestheticians, critics, and historians call an intentionalist. He believes that when we interpret speech and writing, we aim—in large part and perhaps even for the most part—to recover the intentions, or intended meanings, of the speaker or writer. Berkeley and Hume shared Locke’s commitment to intentionalism, but it is a theme that recent philosophical interpreters of all three writers have left largely unexplored. In this paper I discuss the bearing of intentionalism on more familiar themes in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Kenneth P. Winkler (2008). Berkeley and Kant. In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press
  10.  2
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2008). Chapter 8. Berkeley and Kant. In Béatrice Longuenesse & Daniel Garber (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press 142-171.
  11.  20
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2007). Locke's Philosophy of Language - By Walter Ott. Philosophical Books 48 (1):76-78.
  12.  30
    Kenneth Winkler (ed.) (2005). The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press.
    George Berkeley is one of the greatest and most influential modern philosophers. In defending the immaterialism for which he is most famous, he redirected modern thinking about the nature of objectivity and the mind's capacity to come to terms with it. Along the way, he made striking and influential proposals concerning the psychology of the senses, the workings of language, the aims of science, and the scope of mathematics. In this Companion volume a team of distinguished authors not only examines (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13.  8
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2005). Berkeley and the Doctrine of Signs. In Kenneth Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press 125.
  14. Kenneth P. Winkler (2005). The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press.
    George Berkeley is one of the greatest and most influential modern philosophers. In defending the immaterialism for which he is most famous, he redirected modern thinking about the nature of objectivity and the mind's capacity to come to terms with it. Along the way, he made striking and influential proposals concerning the psychology of the senses, the workings of language, the aims of science, and the scope of mathematics. In this Companion volume a team of distinguished authors not only examines (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Kenneth Winkler (2004). Berkeley, Pyrrhonism, and the Theaetetus. In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Oxford University Press 48--54.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Kenneth Winkler (2003). Lockean Logic.”. In Peter R. Anstey (ed.), The Philosophy of John Locke: New Perspectives. Routledge 154--78.
  17.  23
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2000). “All Is Revolution in Us”: Personal Identity in Shaftesbury and Hume. Hume Studies 26 (1):3-40.
  18.  5
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1999). The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Philosophical Review 108 (4):585-587.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Kenneth P. Winkler, Anne Conway, Allison P. Coudert & Taylor Corse (1999). The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Philosophical Review 108 (4):585.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. M. R. Ayers, Phillip D. Cummins, Robert Fogelin, Don Garrett, Edwin McCann, Charles J. McCracken, George Pappas, G. A. J. Rogers, Barry Stroud, Ian Tipton, Margaret D. Wilson & Kenneth Winkler (1998). The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    This collection of essays on themes in the work of John Locke , George Berkeley , and David Hume , provides a deepened understanding of major issues raised in the Empiricist tradition. In exploring their shared belief in the experiential nature of mental constructs, The Empiricists illuminates the different methodologies of these great Enlightenment philosophers and introduces students to important metaphysical and epistemological issues including the theory of ideas, personal identity, and skepticism. It will be especially useful in courses devoted (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  21.  14
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1996). Hutcheson and Hume on the Color of Virtue. Hume Studies 22 (1):3-22.
  22. Kenneth P. Winkler (1994). Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford University Press Uk.
    David Hume wrote that Berkeley's arguments `admit of no answer but produce no conviction'. This book aims at the kind of understanding of Berkeley's philosophy that comes from seeing how we ourselves might be brought to embrace it. Berkeley held that matter does not exist, and that the sensations we take to be caused by an indifferent and independent world are instead caused directly by God. Nature becomes a text, with no existence apart from the spirits who transmit and receive (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  23. Kenneth P. Winkler, David Pears & Annette C. Baier (1994). Hume's System: An Examination of the First Book of His Treatise.A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections on Hume's Treatise. Philosophical Review 103 (4):755.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  13
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1993). Descartes and the Names of God. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67 (4):451-466.
  25.  18
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1993). Grades of Cartesian Innateness. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 1 (2):23 – 44.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  13
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1992). Berkeley. Idealistic Studies 22 (3):300-301.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Kenneth P. Winkler (1992). Ideas, Sentiments, and Qualities. In Phillip D. Cummins (ed.), Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays in the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy. Ridgeview Publishing Company
  28. Kenneth Winkler (1991). Locke on Personal Identity. Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (2):201-226.
  29. Kenneth P. Winkler (1991). The New Hume. Philosophical Review 100 (4):541-579.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  30. Kenneth P. Winkler & Jonathan Dancy (1991). Berkeley: An Introduction. Philosophical Review 100 (2):329.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  4
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1989). Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration. [REVIEW] Noûs 23 (2):263-265.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  32.  26
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1986). Berkeley, Newton and the Stars. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (1):23-42.
  33.  13
    Kenneth Winkler (1985). Hutcheson's Alleged Realism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (2):179-194.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  34.  24
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1985). Berkeley on Volition, Power, and the Complexity of Causation. History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1):53 - 69.
  35.  27
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1985). Scepticism and Anti-Realism. Mind 94 (373):36-52.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  26
    Kenneth Winkler (1984). Berkeley, and Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (3):372-375.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  64
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1983). Berkeley on Abstract Ideas. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 65 (1):63-80.
    There are three propositions that this author demonstrates in his argument: the contention that berkeley 's attack on abstract ideas is not made wholly compatible with his atomic sensationalism, that berkeley does not provide or employ a single definition or criterion for determining the limit of abstraction and that the doctrine of abstract ideas furnishes no real support to berkeley 's argument against the existence of material substance independent of perception.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
Is this list right?