Paul Hoyningen-Huene Universität Hannover
Contact
  • No contact info.

Affiliations
  • Faculty, Universität Hannover

Areas of specialization

Areas of interest

blank
About me
Not much to say..
My works
46 items found.
Sort by:
  1. Paul Hoyningen-Huene & Simon Lohse, Emergence: Postulates and Candidates.
    In the first part of this article we will formulate postulates, which must be satisfied by a reasonable concept of emergence. The postulates will articulate conditions of adequacy for an appropriate explication of the concept of emergence. These conditions of adequacy are based primarily upon the philosophical and scientific history of the concept of emergence, in which the intended role of the concept is expressed. In the second part we will discuss and evaluate some candidates for the concept of emergence (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2012). Philosophical Elements in Thomas Kuhn's Historiography of Science. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (3):281-292.
    To begin, the so-called ‘selectivity of historical judgment’ is discussed. According to it, writing history requires a comparative criterion of historical relevance. This criterion contains philosophical elements. In Kuhn’s case, the criterion directs historical research and presentation away from Whiggish historiography by postulating a hermeneutic reading of historical sources. This postulate implies some sort of internalism, some sort of rationality of scientific development, and historical realism. To conclude, some consequences of Kuhn’s anti-Whiggism are discussed.Para empezar, se discute la llamada “selectividad (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2011). Reconsidering the Miracle Argument on the Supposition of Transient Underdetermination. Synthese 180 (2):173 - 187.
    In this paper, I will show that the Miracle Argument is unsound if one assumes a certain form of transient underdetermination. For this aim, I will first discuss and formalize several variants of underdetermination, especially that of transient underdetermination, by means of measure theory. I will then formalize a popular and persuasive form of the Miracle Argument that is based on "use novelty". I will then proceed to the proof that the miracle argument is unsound by means of a mathematical (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Paul Hoyningen-Huene & Simon Lohse (2011). On Naturalizing Kuhn's Essential Tension. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):215-218.
  5. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2009). Tensions Between Science and Society. Axiomathes 19 (4):417-424.
    What are the “costs” of science besides its expected benefits? Specifically, how “tense” does the relation between science and society become in the light of the ever-increasing pressure of the latter on the former? In this paper I am going to discus the increasing global inequality deriving from phenomena such as the “brain drain” and from the problems relative to the relationship between ethics and science. I will conclude by considering the tension that arises out of the disciplinary structure of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Paul Hoyningen-Huene & Eric Oberheim (2009). Reference, Ontological Replacement and Neo-Kantianism: A Reply to Sankey. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):203-209.
  7. Thomas A. C. Reydon, Helmut Heit & Paul Hoyningen-Huene (eds.) (2009). Der Universale Leibniz: Denker, Forscher, Erfinder. Steiner.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2008). Systematicity: The Nature of Science. Philosophia 36 (2):167-180.
    This paper addresses the question of what the nature of science is. I will first make a few preliminary historical and systematic remarks. Next, I shall give an answer to the question that has to be qualified, clarified and justified. Finally, I will compare my answer with alternative answers and draw consequences for the demarcation problem.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2008). Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
    The paper discusses how well Kuhn’s general theory of scientific revolutions fits the particular case of the chemical revolution. To do so, I first present condensed sketches of both Kuhn’s theory and the chemical revolution. I then discuss the beginning of the chemical revolution and compare it to Kuhn’s specific claims about the roles of anomalies, crisis and extraordinary science in scientific development. I proceed by comparing some features of the chemical revolution as a whole to Kuhn’s general account. The (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Lena Soler, Howard Sankey & Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2008). Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison. Springer.
    The volume is a collection of essays devoted to the analysis of scientific change and stability. It explores the balance and tension that exist between commensurability and continuity on the one hand, and incommensurability and discontinuity on the other. Moreover, it discusses some central epistemological consequences regarding the nature of scientific progress, rationality and realism. In relation to these topics, it investigates a number of new avenues, and revisits some familiar issues, with a focus on the history and philosophy of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2006). Context of Discovery Versus Context of Justification and Thomas Kuhn. In. In Jutta Schickore & Friedrich Steinle (eds.), Revisiting Discovery and Justification. Springer. 119--131.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2006). More Letters by Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kuhn on Proto-Structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4):610-632.
    The paper contains two yet unknown letters that Feyerabend wrote to Kuhn in 1960 or 1961 on a draft of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. In these letters, Feyerabend criticises both details of Kuhn's book and its general direction. The letters anticipate many of the arguments that were put forward in the public controversy against Kuhn's position, including some of the (numerous) misunderstandings. Feyerabend's assertions and arguments are very characteristic of his position in the early sixties.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2002). Paul Feyerabend Und Thomas Kuhn. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (1):61-83.
    The paper discusses some aspects of the relationship between Feyerabend and Kuhn. First, some biographical remarks concerning their connections are made. Second, four characteristics of Feyerabend and Kuhn's concept of incommensurability are discussed. Third, Feyerabend's general criticism of Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions is reconstructed. Forth and more specifically, Feyerabend's criticism of Kuhn's evaluation of normal science is critically investigated. Finally, Feyerabend's re-evaluation of Kuhn's philosophy towards the end of his life is presented.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Paul Hoyningen-Huene & Howard Sankey (2002). Review of T.S. Kuhn, The Road Since ‘Structure’: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):137-142.
  15. Paul Hoyningen-Huene & Howard Sankey (eds.) (2001). Incommensurability and Related Matters. Kluwer.
  16. Howard Sankey & Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2001). In the Introduction To: Incommensurability and Related Matters. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 216.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2000). Eric Oberheim and Daniel Sirtes). In Paul Feyerabend, John Preston, Gonzalo Munévar & David Lamb (eds.), The Worst Enemy of Science?: Essays in Memory of Paul Feyerabend. Oxford University Press. 1.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2000). Paul K. Feyerabend: An Obituary. In John Preston, Gonzalo Munévar & David Lamb (eds.), 'The Worst Enemy of Science'?: Essays in Memory of Paul Feyerabend. Oup Usa.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Paul Hoyningen-Huene & S. Gattei (2000). Recensioni-Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions. Thomas Kuhn's Philosophy of Science. Epistemologia 23 (1):169-170.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Eric Oberheim & Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2000). Feyerabend's Early Philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):363-375.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. P. Hoyningen-Huene (1998). A Further Hypothesis on the Arrangement of the Text in Kant's 'Prolegomena', and the Second Edition of 'Kritik der Reinen Vernunft'. Kant-Studien 89 (1):84-89.
  22. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1998). Eine weitere Textverschiebungshypothese zu Kants Prolegomena (und zur 2. Auflage der KrV). Kant-Studien 89 (1):84-89.
  23. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1997). "Die neuzeitliche Naturerkenntnis zerstört die Natur". Zu Georg Pichts Theorie der modernen Naturwissenschaften. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 51 (1):103 - 114.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Paul Hoyningen-huene (1997). Paul K. Feyerabend. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28 (1):1-18.
  25. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1997). Thomas S. Kuhn. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28 (2):235-256.
  26. Eric Oberheim & Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1997). Incommensurability, Realism, and Meta-Incommensurability. Theoria 12 (3):447-465.
    The essay begins with a detailed consideration of the introduction of incommensurability by Feyerabend in 1962 which exposes several historically inaccurate claims about incommensurability. Section 2 is a coneise argument against causal theories of reference as used as arguments against incommensurability. We object to this strategy because it begs the question by presupposing realism. Section 3 introduces and discusses a hypothesis that w'e call meta-incommensurability which provides the reason for the wide-spread accusation of question-begging and use of circular argumentation among (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1996). Obituary of Thomas S. Kuhn (1922–1996). Erkenntnis 45 (2-3).
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Paul Hoyningen-Huene, Eric Oberheim & Hanne Andersen (1996). On Incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (1):131-141.
  29. Eric Oberheim, Hanne Andersen & Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1996). On Incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (1):131-141.
  30. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1995). Two Letters of Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kuhn on a Draft of the Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (3):353-387.
  31. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1994). Niels Bohr's Argument for the Irreducibility of Biology to Physics. In. In Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 231--255.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1994). Obituary of Paul K. Feyerabend (1924–1994). Erkenntnis 40 (3):289 - 292.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1993). Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science. University of Chicago Press.
    Few philosophers of science have influenced as many readers as Thomas S. Kuhn. Yet no comprehensive study of his ideas has existed--until now. In this volume, Paul Hoyningen-Huene examines Kuhn's work over four decades, from the days before The Structure of Scientific Revolutions to the present, and puts Kuhn's philosophical development in a historical framework. Scholars from disciplines as diverse as political science and art history have offered widely differing interpretations of Kuhn's ideas, appropriating his notions of paradigm shifts and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. R. M. Evans, R. Galambos, N. Geschwind, K. Grelling, K. Gunderson, L. Hartshorn, W. Heisenberg, G. Hinton, G. H. Hogeboom & P. Hoyningen-Huene (1992). Embden, G. 271 Engels, E 57 (N. 11). In Ansgar Beckermann, H. Flohr & Jaegwon Kim (eds.), Emergence or Reduction?: Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism. W. De Gruyter.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1992). Niels Bohrs Argument für die Nichtreduzierbarkeit der Biologie auf die Physik. Philosophia Naturalis 29 (2):229-267.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1992). On the Way to a Theory. In Ansgar Beckermann, H. Flohr & Jaegwon Kim (eds.), Emergence or Reduction?: Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism. W. De Gruyter.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1992). The Interrelations Between the Philosophy, History and Sociology of Science in Thomas Kuhn's Theory of Scientific Development. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (4):487-501.
    The paper deals with the interrelations between the philosophy, sociology and historiography of science in Thomas Kuhn’s theory of scientific development. First, the historiography of science provides the basis for both the philosophy and sociology of science in the sense that the fundamental questions of both disciplines depend on the principles of the form of historiography employed. Second, the fusion of the sociology and philosophy of science, as advocated by Kuhn, is discussed. This fusion consists essentially in a replacement of (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1991). Der Zusammenhang Von Wissenschaftsphilosophie, Wissenschaftsgeschichte Und Wissenschaftssoziologie in der Theorie Thomas Kuhns. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 22 (1):43-59.
    Summary The paper deals with the interrelations among philosophy, sociology, and historiography of science in Thomas Kuhn's theory of scientific development. First, historiography of science provides the basis for both philosophy and sociology of science in the sense that the fundamental questions of both disciplines depend on the principles of the form of historiography employed. Second, the fusion of sociology and philosophy of science, as advocated by Kuhn, is discussed. This fusion consists essentially in a replacement of methodological rules by (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1991). Theorie Antireduktionistischer Argumente: Fallstudie Bohr. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 39 (1-6).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1990). Kuhn's Conception of Incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (3):481-492.
  41. P. Hoyningen-Huene (1989). Weltbilder in der Politik. Analogien Aus der Wissenschaftstheorie. Conceptus 23 (58):77-92.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1989). Idealist Elements In Thomas Kuhn'S Philosophy Of Science. History of Philosophy Quarterly 6 (October):393-401.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1987). Context of Discovery and Context of Justification. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 18 (4):501-515.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1987). On the Distinction Between the 'Context'of Discovery and the 'Context'of Justification. Epistemologia 10:81-88.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Eric Oberheim & Paul Hoyningen-Huene, 'The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories'. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Peter Schaber & Paul Hoyningen-Huene, Incommensurability of Knowledge: Theories and Values.
Is this list right?