Benjamin Smart University of Birmingham, University of Johannesburg
blank
About me
Born in Jersey (Channel Islands not the USA!); an avid golf, cricket and Birmingham city fan; lived in Nottingham and have been associated with Nottingham University since 2002. My interests largely lie in the realm of causation, laws, and how our concept of causation relates to laws of nature. However I have also worked on the philosophy of time, philosophy of science, and the philosophy of sex.
My works
15 items found.
Sort by:
  1. Benjamin Smart (2014). On the Classification of Diseases. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (4):251-269.
    Identifying the necessary and sufficient conditions for individuating and classifying diseases is a matter of great importance in the fields of law, ethics, epidemiology, and of course, medicine. In this paper, I first propose a means of achieving this goal, ensuring that no two distinct disease-types could correctly be ascribed to the same disease-token. I then posit a metaphysical ontology of diseases—that is, I give an account of what a disease is. This is essential to providing the most effective means (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Benjamin Smart, Hypertemporal Humeanism and the Open Future.
    Take strong open-future Humeanism (OFH) to comprise the following three tenets: (i) that truth supervenes on being (ii) that there is a dynamic present moment, and (iii) that there are no future facts; that is, contingent propositions about the future obtain truth values only when their referents are actualised (Tooley 1997). On the face of it this is a deeply problematic metaphysic - if there are no future facts then prima facie the Humean can neither provide laws of nature, nor (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. B. Turner & B. Smart (forthcoming). The Disciplines. Body and Society.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Benjamin Smart (2013). Is the Humean Defeated by Induction? Philosophical Studies 162 (2):319-332.
    Many necessitarians about cause and law (Armstrong 1983; Mumford 2004; Bird 2007) have argued that Humeans are unable to justify their inductive inferences, as Humean laws are nothing but the sum of their instances. In this paper I argue against these necessitarian claims. I show that Armstrong is committed to the explanatory value of Humean laws (in the form of universally quantified statements), and that contra Armstrong, brute regularities often do have genuine explanatory value. I finish with a Humean attempt (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. S. Barker & B. Smart (2012). The Ultimate Argument Against Dispositional Monist Accounts of Laws. Analysis 72 (4):714-722.
    Alexander Bird argues that David Armstrong’s necessitarian conception of physical modality and laws of nature generates a vicious regress with respect to necessitation. We show that precisely the same regress afflicts Bird’s dispositional-monist theory, and indeed, related views, such as that of Mumford and Anjum. We argue that dispositional monism is basically Armstrongian necessitarianism modified to allow for a thesis about property identity.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Benjamin Smart & Stephen Barker (2012). The Ultimate Argument Against Dispositional Monist Accounts of Laws. Analysis 72 (4):714-723.
    Alexander Bird argues that David Armstrong’s necessitarian conception of physical modality and laws of nature generates a vicious regress with respect to necessitation. We show that precisely the same regress afflicts Bird’s dispositional-monist theory, and indeed, related views, such as that of Mumford and Anjum. We argue that dispositional monism is basically Armstrongian necessitarianism modified to allow for a thesis about property identity.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. B. Smart (2011). Another 'Great Transformation' or Common Ruin? Theory, Culture and Society 28 (2):131-151.
    In the aftermath of the 1930s Great Depression, and as the Second World War was drawing to a close, Karl Polanyi concluded a critical analysis of market capitalism on an optimistic — and with the benefit of hindsight we can add premature — note, remarking that the ‘primacy of society’ over the economic system had been ‘secured’. Eighty years later, amidst the unresolved turmoil of another comparable global capitalist economic crisis and accumulating signs of a growing environmental crisis, both a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Benjamin Smart (2009). Regularity Theory and Inductive Scepticism: The Fight Against Armstrong. Lyceum 11.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. George Ritzer & B. Smart (2001). Introduction: Theorists, Theories and Theorizing. In Barry Smart & George Ritzer (eds.), Handbook of Social Theory. Sage 1--9.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. B. Smart (1996). (Mis) Understanding Japan. Theory, Culture and Society 13 (3):179-192.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. B. Smart (1991). Theory and Analysis After Foucault. Theory, Culture and Society 8 (2):145-155.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. B. Smart (1982). "Body, Mind, and Method: Essays in Honour of Virgil C. Aldrich". Edited by D. F. Gustafson and B. L. Tapscott. [REVIEW] Mind 91:313.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. B. Smart (1979). "The Identities of Persons." Edited by A. O. Rorty. [REVIEW] Mind 88:147.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. B. Smart (1978). CHISHOLM, R. M. "Person and Object, A Metaphysical Study". [REVIEW] Mind 87:466.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Benjamin Smart, A Critique of Humean and Anti-Humean Metaphysics of Cause and Law - Final Version.
    Metaphysicians play an important role in our understanding of the universe. In recent years, physicists have focussed on finding accurate mathematical formalisms of the evolution of our physical system - if a metaphysician can uncover the metaphysical underpinnings of these formalisms; that is, why these formalisms seem to consistently map the universe, then our understanding of the world and the things in it is greatly enhanced. Science, then, plays a very important role in our project, as the best scientific formalisms (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
Is this list right?