Howard Simmons British Philosophical Association

  • Administrator, British Philosophical Association
  • PhD, McMaster University, 1986.

Areas of specialization

Areas of interest

My philosophical views

About me
I am an independent writer of philosophy currently specialising in ethics and philosophical logic. My book 'Moral Desert: A Critique' was published by the University Press of America in 2010. I am an official adviser to secondary school teachers of philosophy for the British Philosophical Association and manage the latter's 'Philosophical Answers' website(
My works
6 items found.
  1. Howard Simmons (2010). Moral Desert: A Critique. University Press of America.
    This book argues that moral desert should be excluded as a consideration in normative and applied ethics, as it is likely that no-one ever morally deserves anything for their actions and, if they do, it is in most cases impossible to know what. I also explain how moral deliberation in relation to punishment, distributive justice and personal morality can proceed without appeals to moral desert.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  2.  31
    Howard Simmons (1997). Circumstances and the Truth of Words: A Reply to Travis. Mind 106 (421):117-118.
    I answer an argument from Charles Travis to the conclusion that minimalism about truth cannot cope with the context sensitivity of words. To do this, I construct a thought experiment involving a community whose language does not manifest context sensitivity, but whose statements do seem to be subject to truth in a minimalist sense.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  64
    Howard Simmons (1988). Nathan on Evidential Insatiability. Analysis 48 (1):57 - 59.
    This is a response to a paper by N.M.L. Nathan in which he argues that the attempt to provide a global justification of our entire set of beliefs necessarily leads to an infinite regress, in contrast with cases of local uncertainty, which he thinks can be resolved without regress. I argue that if he is right about the local uncertainty case, then he should not fear a regress in the global case, as the two situations are more similar than he (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  4. Howard Simmons, Sher on Blame.
    My subject is the theory of blame recently propounded by George Sher in his book, In Praise of Blame. I argue that although Sher has succeeded in capturing a number of genuine features of the concept of blame, there is an important element that he has omitted, which is the fact that necessarily, when A blames B for something and expresses this to B, A will realise that B is likely to find this unpleasant. The inclusion of the latter element (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  5.  57
    Howard J. Simmons, Why You Should One-Box in Newcomb's Problem.
    I consider a familiar argument for two-boxing in Newcomb's Problem and find it defective because it involves a type of divergence from standard Baysian reasoning, which, though sometimes justified, conflicts with the stipulations of the Newcomb scenario. In an appendix, I also find fault with a different argument for two-boxing that has been presented by Graham Priest.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  6.  64
    Howard J. Simmons, Zombies Defeated: A Projectivist Account of Third-Person Consciousness Ascriptions.
    I defend an argument from Lauren Ashwell and Eric Marcus to the effect that the zombie idea is meaningless. I consider whether this idea could be saved from the force of the argument by adopting a projectivist account of third-person consciousness ascriptions. I decide that it cannot, but commend that account anyway.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
Is this list right?