• No contact info.

  • PhD, Purdue University, 2012.

Areas of specialization

Areas of interest

About me
Not much to say..
My works
7 items found.
  1.  7
    Erik Baldwin (2015). Yinyang: The Way of Heaven and Earth in Chinese Thought and Culture ROBIN R. WANG New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012; Xii + 250 Pp., $27.99. [REVIEW] Dialogue 54 (1):196-197.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  2. Erik Baldwin (2013). Putting Uninstantiated Human Person Essences to Work: A Comment on Davis and Craig on The Grounding Objection. Philosophia Christi 15 (2):221-225.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  3.  19
    Erik Baldwin (2012). Religious Dogma Without Religious Fundamentalism. Journal of Social Science 8 (1):85-90.
    New Atheists and Anti-Theists (such as Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, Christopher Hutchins) affirm that there is a strong connection between being a traditional theist and being a religious fundamentalist who advocates violence, terrorism, and war. They are especially critical of Islam. On the contrary, I argue that, when correctly understood, religious dogmatic belief, present in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, is progressive and open to internal and external criticism and revision. Moreover, acknowledging that human knowledge is finite and that (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  4.  9
    Erik Baldwin (2011). On Buddhist and Taoist Morality. Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 16 (2):99-110.
    Arthur Danto argues that all Eastern philosophies – except Confucianism – fail to accept necessary conditions on genuine morality: a robust notion of agency and that actions are praiseworthy only if performed voluntarily, in accordance with rules, and from motives based on the moral worth and well-being of others. But Danto’s arguments fail: Neo-Taoism and Mohism satisfy these allegedly necessary constraints and Taoism and Buddhism both posit moral reasons that fall outside the scope of Danto’s allegedly necessary conditions on genuine (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  5. Erik Baldwin (2010). On the Prospects of an Islamic Externalist Account of Warrant. In Tymieniecka Anna-Teresa & Muhtaroglu Nazif (eds.), Classic Issues in Islamic Philosophy and Theology Today (Islamic Philosophy and Occidental Phenomenology in Dialogue, vol. 4. Springer
    Alvin Plantinga’s externalist religious epistemology, which incorporates a proper function account of warrant, forms the basis for his standard and extended Aquinas/Calvin models. Respectively, these models show how it could be that Theistic Belief and Christian Belief could be warranted for believers in a properly basic manner. Christianity and Islam share fundamental theses that underlie the plausibility of Plantinga’s models: the Dependency Thesis, the Design Thesis, and the Immediacy Thesis. Accordingly, an Islamic worldview can endorse the truth of the standard (...)
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  6.  73
    Erik Baldwin & Michael Thune (2008). The Epistemological Limits of Experience-Based Exclusive Religious Belief. Religious Studies 44 (4):445-455.
    Alvin Plantinga and other philosophers have argued that exclusive religious belief can be rationally held in response to certain experiences – independently of inference to other beliefs, evidence, arguments, and the like – and thus can be 'properly basic'. We think that this is possible only until the believer acquires the defeater we develop in this paper, a defeater which arises from an awareness of certain salient features of religious pluralism. We argue that, as a consequence of this defeater, continued (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  7.  11
    Erik Baldwin (2006). Could the Extended Aquinas/Calvin Model Defeat Basic Christian Belief? Philosophia Christi 8 (2):383-399.
Is this list right?