Kristin M. Mickelson University of Minnesota, Morris
Contact
  • No contact info.

Affiliations
  • Faculty, University of Minnesota, Morris
  • PhD, University of Colorado, Boulder, 2012.

Areas of specialization

Areas of interest

blank
About me
Not much to say..
My works
5 items found.
Sort by:
  1. Kristin Mickelson (forthcoming). The Zygote Argument is Invalid: Now What? Philosophical Studies:1-19.
    Alfred Mele’s original Zygote Argument is invalid. At most, its premises entail the negative thesis that free action is incompossible with deterministic laws, but its conclusion asserts the positive thesis that deterministic laws preclude free action. The original, explanatory conclusion of the Zygote Argument can be defended only by supplementing it with a best-explanation argument that identifies deterministic laws as menacing. . Arguably, though, the best explanation for the manipulation victim’s lack of freedom and responsibility is his constitutive luck, which (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Kristin Mickelson (2010). The Soft-Line Solution to Pereboom's Four-Case Argument. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):595-617.
    Derk Pereboom's Four-Case Argument is among the most famous and resilient manipulation arguments against compatibilism. I contend that its resilience is not a function of the argument's soundness but, rather, the ill-gotten gain from an ambiguity in the description of the causal relations found in the argument's foundational case. I expose this crucial ambiguity and suggest that a dilemma faces anyone hoping to resolve it. After a thorough search for an interpretation which avoids both horns of this dilemma, I conclude (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Kristin Mickelson, A Critique of Vihvelin's "Three-Fold Classification" [Forthcoming: Canadian Journal of Philosophy].
    The standard definitions of “incompatibilism” and “compatibilism” are problematic because these definitions do not capture the robust metaphysical and explanatory commitments of the historical views associated with these terms. As a result, equivocation on these terms is commonplace and the dialectic of the free-will debate has been obscured. Kadri Vihvelin proposes that philosophers replace the standard taxonomy of free-will views with her “Three-fold Classification.” In this essay, I argue that Vihvelin’s proposed taxonomy is also untenable. Among other things, Vihvelin’s definition (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Kristin Mickelson, The Explanation-Based Taxonomy of Free-Will Views [Temporarily Unavailable].
    The standard definitions of terms such as ‘incompatibilism’ and ‘compatibilism’ are problematic because these definitions do not capture the robust metaphysical and explanatory commitments of the historical views associated with these terms. As a result of equivocation on such terms is commonplace and the dialectic of the free-will debate has been obscured. In this essay, I defend a new and more exhaustive taxonomy of free-will views, the “Explanation-based Taxonomy.” This new taxonomy avoids the problems of its predecessors, and gives philosophers (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Kristin Mickelson & Christian Lee, Redefining 'Determinism' [Temporarily Unavailable].
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
Is this list right?