Tristan Haze University of Sydney
Contact

Affiliations
  • Graduate student, University of Sydney

Areas of specialization
  • None specified

Areas of interest

blank
About me
I am currently working on a PhD on modality and the philosophy of language, the centrepiece of which is a new account of the conditions under which a proposition is necessarily true. Blog: sprachlogik.blogspot.com (founded early 2011). An outline of some of my main ideas, with links to further exposition at my own blog, can be found here: http://www.philpercs.com/2015/10/outline-of-a-system.html
My works
4 items found.
Order:
  1.  52
    Tristan Haze (forthcoming). A Counterexample to the Breckenridge-Magidor Account of Instantial Reasoning. Journal of Philosophical Research 41.
    In a recent paper, Breckenridge and Magidor argue for an interesting and counterintuitive account of instantial reasoning. According to this account, in arguments such as one beginning with 'There is some x such that x is mortal. Let O be such an x. ...', the 'O' refers to a particular object, although we cannot know which. I give and defend a simple counterexample involving the notion of an unreferred-to object.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  74
    Tristan Haze (forthcoming). Two New Counterexamples to the Truth-Tracking Theory of Knowledge. Logos and Episteme.
    I present two counterexamples to the recently back-in-favour truth-tracking account of knowledge: one involving a true belief resting on a counterfactually robust delusion, one involving a true belief acquired alongside a bunch of false beliefs. These counterexamples carry over to a recent modification of the theory due to Briggs and Nolan (2012), and seem invulnerable to a recent defence of the theory against known counterexamples, by Adams and Clarke (2005).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  86
    Tristan Haze (2015). A Problem for Hofweber’s Ontological Project. Philosophia 43 (3):843-846.
    Thomas Hofweber's well-known ontological project crucially involves inferring negative existential statements from statements of non-reference, i.e. statements that say that some term or terms do not refer. Here, after explaining the context of this move, I aim to show that it is fallacious, and that this vitiates Hofweber's ontological project.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  45
    Tristan Haze, Outline of a System.
    What follows is a brief outline of a system of ideas in analytic philosophy which I have been developing. The system is not closed or final, and there is ample opportunity for further research connected with it. Here I have confined myself to stating the points I am most confident are correct. -/- I take certain parts of Kripke's work as a starting-point, especially the idea that there are necessary a posteriori and contingent a priori truths, and the idea that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
Is this list right?