You are accessing PhilPapers from Open University (UK), an institution that is not subscribed to PhilPapers. Starting on July 1, 2014, we ask institutions that grant philosophy degrees and are based in high-GDP countries to contribute to PhilPapers' maintenance and development through a subscription. See this page for details. Please show your support by contacting your librarian.
Contact

Affiliations
  • PhD, University of Wales Lampeter, 2010.

Areas of specialization
  • None specified

Areas of interest

blank
About me
Not much to say..
My works
14 items found.
Sort by:
  1. David Robjant (forthcoming). Who Killed Arnold Baffin? Iris Murdoch and Philosophy by Literature. Philosophy and Literature.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. David Robjant (forthcoming). What Use is Literature to Political Philosophy? Or: The Funny Thing About Socrates’ Nose. Philosophy and Literature.
    Readers of Plato’s Republic wildly underestimate Thrasymachus’ challenge if they treat it as a claim about ‘justice’, and in grasping Plato’s response it is dangerous to confuse his aims and methods with those agreed on by his characters. Plato’s service to political philosophy is not merely literary, but comic. Plato’s drama exposes and ridicules a generalisation from Thrasymachus' own moral psychology at the heart of Thrasymachus’ political vision. Insight and comedy are born together when a pig who theorises a city (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. David Robjant (2013). Is Iris Murdoch a Closet Existentialist? Some Trouble with Vision, Choice and Exegesis. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):475-494.
    : Richard Moran argues that Iris Murdoch is an Existentialist who pretends not to be. His support for this view will be shown to depend on his attempt to assimilate Iris Murdoch's discussion of moral ‘vision’ in the parable of the Mother in Law to Sartre's thought on ‘choice’ and ‘orientation’. Discussing both Moran's Murdoch exegesis and Sartre's Being and Nothingness, I develop the Sartrean view to which Moran hopes to assimilate Murdoch, before pointing out how Moran's assimilation fails. Murdoch's (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. David Robjant (2013). Nauseating Flux: Iris Murdoch on Sartre and Heraclitus. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1).
    I observe Iris Murdoch's distinctive use of the word ‘flux’ in discussion of Sartre's Nausea and show that her usage is persuasive and revolutionary, first as Sartre exegesis, second as Heraclitus exegesis, and throughout as a contribution to the philosophy of language. Murdoch's usage of ‘flux’ frames a comparison of Sartre's Roquentin with other figures who have had similarly flowing experience but without nausea. Roquentin's plight is shown to be ‘a philosopher's plight’ precipitated by a defective theory of descriptive success. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David Robjant (2013). Symposium on Iris Murdoch. How Miserable We Are, How Wicked; Into the ‘Void’ with Murdoch, Mulhall, and Antonaccio. Heythrop Journal 54 (6):999-1006.
    Murdoch brings together the darkness of misery and the darkness of wickedness under the observation that ‘goodness is not acontinuously active organic part of our purposes and wishes’. This looks like an empirically minded correction of Socrates. But besides correcting Socrates, is Murdoch also offering, as Stephen Mulhall suggests, ‘a fundamental counter-example’ to her own ‘moral vision’? This depends on what one takes Murdoch’s moral vision to be. I trace Mulhall's mistake to Maria Antonaccio's misidentification of the good with the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David Robjant (2012). Good, Evil and the Virtuous Iris Murdoch CommentaryIris Murdoch, Philosopher, Edited by JustinBroackes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, 400 Pp. ISBN 978-0-19-928990-5 Hb £35.00. [REVIEW] European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):621-635.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. David Robjant (2012). Learning of Pains; Wittgenstein's Own Cartesian Mistake at Investigations 246. Wittgenstein Studien 2012 3 (2012):261-285.
    I consider the support variously offered for the remark at Philosophical Investigations 246: ‘It can’t be said of me at all (except perhaps as a joke) that I know I am in pain.’ Against the first sort of argument to be found in Wittgenstein and the literature I offer cases in which I learn of pain. Against the second sort of argument I develop the case in which I am persuaded by compelling evidence that I am, contrary to what I (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David Robjant (2012). The Earthy Realism of Plato's Metaphysics, Or: What Shall We Do with Iris Murdoch? Philosophical Investigations 35 (1):43-67.
    I develop Iris Murdoch's argument that “there is no Platonic ‘elsewhere,’ similar to the Christian ‘elsewhere.’ ” Thus: Iris Murdoch is against the Separation of the Forms not as a correction of Plato but in order to keep faith with him; Plato's Parmenides is not a source book of accurately targeted self-refutation but a catalogue of student errors; the testimony of Aristotle and Gilbert Ryle about Plato's motivations in the Theory of Forms is not an indubitable foundation from which to (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. David Robjant (2011). As a Buddhist Christian; the Misappropriation of Iris Murdoch. Heythrop Journal 52 (6):993-1008.
    This is a rebuttal of influential attempts to appropriate Murdoch for either Christianity or Buddhism. I show that Maria Antonaccio and Peter Byrne ignore Murdoch's explicit statements and misunderstand Murdoch’s interest in the Ontological Argument. I explain how St. Anselm’s remark ‘I believe in order to understand’ is properly connected with Murdoch’s parable of the Mother-in-Law: Murdoch is here offering support for a virtue epistemology. Later, I explore the merits and dangers of exegesis from Peter J. Conradi and Gordon Graham (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. David Robjant (2011). E. Jane Doering, Simone Weil and the Specter of Self-Perpetuating Force. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 31 (1):16-18.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. David Robjant (2011). Is Iris Murdoch an Unconscious Misogynist? Some Trouble with Sabina Lovibond, the Mother in Law, and Gender. Heythrop Journal 52 (6):1021-1031.
    If in our use of imagery we are all of us the unacknowledged legislators of the world, it would follow that one can ‘serve the cause of sexual equality in education’ by challenging the way our images of the academic are gendered. This is the excellent stated purpose of Sabina Lovibond's short new book, Iris Murdoch, Gender and Philosophy. The effect is as I shall show somewhat at odds with this.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. David Robjant (2011). REVIEW: E. Jane Doering 'Simone Weil and the Specter of Self-Perpetuating Force.'. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 31 (1):3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. David Robjant (2005). Levin on the Abnormality of Homosexuality. Think 4 (11):5.
    David Robjant also criticizes Levin's article from Think 10.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. David Robjant (2000). IRIS MURDOCH'S EVERYDAY "METAPHYSICAL ENTITIES&Quot;. Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 4:1.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
Is this list right?