Guglielmo Feis Università degli Studi di Milano
Contact

Affiliations
  • Graduate student, Università degli Studi di Milano
  • PhD, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2014.

Areas of specialization
  • None specified

Areas of interest

Edited categories

blank
About me
Ph.D in Philosophy of Law at the Università degli Studi di Milano. I work on impossibilities in the law, social ontology, and on the "Ought" implies "Can" (supposed) principle.
My works
9 items found.
Order:
  1.  17
    Guglielmo Feis & Jacopo Tagliabue (2015). What’s New About New Realism? Mereology and the Varieties of Realism. Philosophia 43 (4):1035-1046.
    The paper set up a small “philosophical lab” for thought experiments using Digital Universes as its main tool. Digital Universes allow us to examine how mereology affects the debate on New Realism of Ferraris and shed new light on the whole notion of Realism. The semi-formal framework provides a convenient way to model the varieties of realism that are important for the program of New Realism: we then draw the natural consequences of this approach into the ontology of our world, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Guglielmo Feis (2014). Impossibilità Nel Diritto. Dissertation, Università Degli Studi di Milano
    My Ph.D. thesis œImpossibilità nel diritto€ [Impossibility in the Legal Domain] is devoted to the systematic analyses of what are called, at least prima facie, €œlegal impossibilities. My dissertation defines and isolates an area of studies - impossibility in the law - that has never been put organically together. In my work I present some case studies of normative impossibilities and discuss them from a philosophical point of view: impossible laws, impossible norms in a prescriptive theory of norms (ch. 2), (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  22
    Guglielmo Feis (2014). The OIC/PAP Dispute: Two Ways of Interpreting the '€˜Ought' Implies '€˜Can'€™. In Sofia Bonicalzi, Leonardo Caffo & Mattia Sorgon (eds.), Naturalism and Constructivism in Metaethics. Cambridge Scholars 172--181.
  4. Guglielmo Feis (2013). Network Analysis Formalism and the Construction of a Traceability System for Payments. A Sketch of its Legal and Sociological Aspects. Informatica E Diritto 22 (1):281--298.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  2
    Guglielmo Feis (2012). '€œDovere Implica Potere'€ a Tutela Dei Diritti? In Mario Cossutta (ed.), Diritti Fondamentali E Diritti Sociali. Eut Edizioni Università di Trieste 81--92.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  27
    Guglielmo Feis (2012). The “Ought” Implies “Can” Principle: A Challenge to Collective Intentionality. Phenomenology and Mind 2:114-121.
    I investigate collective intentionality (CI) through the “Ought” implies “Can” (OIC) principle. My leading question is does OIC impose any further requirement on CI? In answering the challenge inside a Searlean framework, I realize that we need to clarify what CI's structure is and what kind of role the agents joining a CI-act have. In the last part of the paper, I put forward an (inverted) Hartian framework to allow the Searlean CI theory to be agent sensitive and cope with (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Guglielmo Feis & Umberto Sconfienza (2012). Challenging the Constitutive Rules Inviolability Dogma. Phenomenology and Mind 3:127-138.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  7
    Guglielmo Feis (2011). Meeting Dan Sperber'€™s Challenge to Searlean Social Ontology. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Analitica--Junior 2 (2):120--123.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  2
    Guglielmo Feis (2010). Maurizio Ferraris, Documentare la documentalità prima del collasso ontologico. Enthymema 1:275--288.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
Is this list right?