Guglielmo Feis Università degli Studi di Milano
Contact

Affiliations
  • Graduate student, Università degli Studi di Milano

Areas of specialization
  • None specified

Areas of interest

Edited categories

blank
About me
Ph.D in Philosophy of Law at the Università degli Studi di Milano. I work on impossibilities in the law, social ontology, and on the "Ought" implies "Can" (supposed) principle.
My works
8 items found.
Sort by:
  1. Guglielmo Feis (2014). Impossibilità Nel Diritto. Dissertation, Università Degli Studi di Milano
    My Ph.D. thesis œImpossibilità nel diritto€ [Impossibility in the Legal Domain] is devoted to the systematic analyses of what are called, at least prima facie, €œlegal impossibilities. My dissertation defines and isolates an area of studies - impossibility in the law - that has never been put organically together. In my work I present some case studies of normative impossibilities and discuss them from a philosophical point of view: impossible laws, impossible norms in a prescriptive theory of norms (ch. 2), (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Guglielmo Feis (2014). The OIC/PAP Dispute: Two Ways of Interpreting the '€˜Ought' Implies '€˜Can'€™. In Sofia Bonicalzi, Leonardo Caffo & Mattia Sorgon (eds.), Naturalism and Constructivism in Metaethics. Cambridge Scholars. 172--181.
  3. Guglielmo Feis (2013). Network Analysis Formalism and the Construction of a Traceability System for Payments. A Sketch of its Legal and Sociological Aspects. Informatica E Diritto 22 (1):281--298.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Guglielmo Feis (2012). '€œDovere Implica Potere'€ a Tutela Dei Diritti? In Mario Cossutta (ed.), Diritti Fondamentali E Diritti Sociali. Eut Edizioni Università di Trieste. 81--92.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Guglielmo Feis (2012). The “Ought” Implies “Can” Principle: A Challenge to Collective Intentionality. Phenomenology and Mind 2:114-121.
    I investigate collective intentionality (CI) through the “Ought” implies “Can” (OIC) principle. My leading question is does OIC impose any further requirement on CI? In answering the challenge inside a Searlean framework, I realize that we need to clarify what CI's structure is and what kind of role the agents joining a CI-act have. In the last part of the paper, I put forward an (inverted) Hartian framework to allow the Searlean CI theory to be agent sensitive and cope with (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Guglielmo Feis & Umberto Sconfienza (2012). Challenging the Constitutive Rules Inviolability Dogma. Phenomenology and Mind 3:127-138.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Guglielmo Feis (2011). Meeting Dan Sperber'€™s Challenge to Searlean Social Ontology. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Analitica--Junior 2 (2):120--123.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Guglielmo Feis (2010). Maurizio Ferraris, Documentare la documentalità prima del collasso ontologico. Enthymema 1:275--288.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
Is this list right?