Gideon Samid Case Western Reserve University
Contact
  • No contact info.

Affiliations
  • Faculty, Case Western Reserve University
  • PhD, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, 2002.

Areas of specialization
  • None specified

Areas of interest

My philosophical views


blank

My philosophical views

The answers shown here are not necessarily the same provided as part of the 2009 PhilPapers Survey. These answers can be updated at any time.

See also:

QuestionAnswerComments
A priori knowledge: yes or no?Skip
Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism?Agnostic/undecidedI believe in the Unbound Ignorance, namely the question itself is asked out of ignorance, and makes no sense in light of the knowledge that we miss.
Aesthetic value: objective or subjective?Skip
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no?Skip
Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism?Skip
External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism?Agnostic/undecidedI believe in the Unbound Ignorance, namely the question itself is asked out of ignorance, and makes no sense in light of the knowledge that we miss.
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will?Skip
God: theism or atheism?Skip
Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism?Agnostic/undecidedI believe in the Unbound Ignorance, namely the question itself is asked out of ignorance, and makes no sense in light of the knowledge that we miss.
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism?Agnostic/undecidedI believe in the Unbound Ignorance, namely the question itself is asked out of ignorance, and makes no sense in light of the knowledge that we miss.
Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean?Agnostic/undecidedI believe in the Unbound Ignorance, namely the question itself is asked out of ignorance, and makes no sense in light of the knowledge that we miss.
Logic: classical or non-classical?Skip
Mental content: internalism or externalism?Skip
Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism?Skip
Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism?Agnostic/undecidedI believe in the Unbound Ignorance, namely the question itself is asked out of ignorance, and makes no sense in light of the knowledge that we miss.
Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism?Skip
Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism?Skip
Moral motivation: internalism or externalism?Skip
Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes?Skip
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics?Skip
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory?Skip
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view?Skip
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism?Skip
Proper names: Fregean or Millian?Skip
Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism?Skip
Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death?Skip
Time: A-theory or B-theory?Skip
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch?Skip
Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic?Skip
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible?Skip