Morten Overgaard Aalborg University
Contact

Affiliations
  • Faculty, Aalborg University

Areas of specialization
  • None specified

Areas of interest

blank
About me
Not much to say..
My works
31 items found.
Sort by:
  1. M. Overgaard (forthcoming). Automaticity, Unconsciousness and Speech Production. Science and Consciousness Review.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Kristian Sandberg, Bo Martin Bibby & Morten Overgaard (2013). Measuring and Testing Awareness of Emotional Face Expressions. Consciousness and Cognition 22 (3):806-809.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Mikkel C. Vinding, Michael N. Pedersen & Morten Overgaard (2013). Unravelling Intention: Distal Intentions Increase the Subjective Sense of Agency. Consciousness and Cognition 22 (3):810-815.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Morten Overgaard & Thor Grünbaum (2012). Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Conceptions of Consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (3):137.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Morten Overgaard & Mads Jensen (eds.) (2012). Consciousness and Neural Plasticity. Frontiers Books.
  6. Morten Overgaard (2011). Visual Experience and Blindsight: A Methodological Review. Experimental Brain Research 209:473-479.
    Blindsight is classically defined as residual visual capacity, e.g., to detect and identify visual stimuli, in the total absence of perceptual awareness following lesions to V1. However, whereas most experiments have investigated what blindsight patients can and cannot do, the literature contains several, often contradictory, remarks about remaining visual experience. This review examines closer these remarks as well as experiments that directly approach the nature of possibly spared visual experiences in blindsight.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Morten Overgaard & Thor Grünbaum (2011). Consciousness and Modality: On the Possible Preserved Visual Consciousness in Blindsight Subjects. Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1855-1859.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Morten Overgaard & Jesper Mogensen (2011). A Framework for the Study of Multiple Realizations: The Importance of Levels of Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 2.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Kristian Sandberg, Bo Martin Bibby, Bert Timmermans, Axel Cleeremans & Morten Overgaard (2011). Measuring Consciousness: Task Accuracy and Awareness as Sigmoid Functions of Stimulus Duration. Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1659-1675.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Morten Overgaard & Rikke Overgaard (2010). Neural Correlates of Contents and Levels of Consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology 1:164.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Morten Overgaard, Bert Timmermans, Kristian Sandberg & Axel Cleeremans (2010). Optimizing Subjective Measures of Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (2):682-684.
    Dienes and Seth (2010) conclude that confidence ratings and post-decision wagering are two comparable and recommendable measures of conscious experience. In a recently submitted paper, we have however found that both methods are problematic and seem less suited to measure consciousness than a direct introspective measure. Here, we discuss the methodology and conclusions put forward by Dienes and Seth, and why we think the two experiments end up with so different recommendations.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Kristian Sandberg, Bert Timmermans, Morten Overgaard & Axel Cleeremans (2010). Measuring Consciousness: Is One Measure Better Than the Other? Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1069-1078.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Bert Timmermans, Kristian Sandberg, Axel Cleeremans & Morten Overgaard (2010). Partial Awareness Distinguishes Between Measuring Conscious Perception and Conscious Content: Reply to Dienes and Seth. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1081-1083.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Anil K. Seth, Zoltan Dienes, Axel Cleeremans, Morten Overgaard & Luiz Pessoa (2008). Measuring Consciousness: Relating Behavioural and Neurophysiological Approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (8):314-321.
  15. Morten Overgaard (2006). Consciousness Studies: The View From Psychology. [REVIEW] British Journal of Psychology 97 (3):425-438.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Morten Overgaard (2006). Introspection in Science. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (4):629-633.
  17. Morten Overgaard, Mika Koivisto, Thomas Alrik Sorensen, Signe Vangkilde & Antti Revonsuo (2006). The Electrophysiology of Introspection. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (4):662-672.
  18. Morten Overgaard, Julian Rote, Kim Mouridsen & Thomas Zoega Ramsoy (2006). Is Conscious Perception Gradual or Dichotomous? A Comparison of Report Methodologies During a Visual Task. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (4):700-708.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Shaun Gallagher & Morten Overgaard (2005). Introspections Without Introspeculations. In Murat Aydede (ed.), Pain: New Essays on its Nature and the Methodology of its Study. Cambridge Ma: Bradford Book/Mit Press.
  20. Morten Overgaard (2004). Confounding Factors in Contrastive Analysis. Synthese 141 (2):217-31.
    Several authors within psychology, neuroscience and philosophy take for granted that standard empirical research techniques are applicable when studying consciousness. In this article, it is discussed whether one of the key methods in cognitive neuroscience – the contrastive analysis – suffers from any serious confounding when applied to the field of consciousness studies; that is to say, if there are any systematic difficulties when studying consciousness with this method that make the results untrustworthy. Through an analysis of theoretical arguments in (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Morten Overgaard (2004). On the Naturalizing of Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):365-79.
    In the attempt to construct a scientific approach to consciousness, it has been proposed that transcendental phenomenology or phenomenological psychology be introduced into the framework of cognitive neuroscience. In this article, the consequences of such an approach in terms of basic assumptions, methods for the collection of data, and evaluation of the collected data are discussed. Especially, the proposed notions of mutual constraint and the second perso are discussed. It is concluded that even though naturalising of phenomenology might not prove (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Morten Overgaard (2004). Special Issue on the Return of Subjectivity Edited by Dan Zahavi. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3:399-400.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Morten Overgaard, Jorgen Feldbaek Nielsen & Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen (2004). A TMS Study of the Ventral Projections From V1 with Implications for the Finding of Neural Correlates of Consciousness. Brain and Cognition 54 (1):58-64.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Morten Overgaard & T. A. Sorenson (2004). Introspection Distinct From First-Order Experiences. Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (7-8):11--7.
  25. Thomas Zoega Ramsøy & Morten Overgaard (2004). Introspection and Subliminal Perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (1):1-23.
    Subliminal perception (SP) is today considered a well-supported theory stating that perception can occur without conscious awareness and have a significant impact on later behaviour and thought. In this article, we first present and discuss different approaches to the study of SP. In doing this, we claim that most approaches are based on a dichotomic measure of awareness. Drawing upon recent advances and discussions in the study of introspection and phenomenological psychology, we argue for both the possibility and necessity of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Morten Overgaard (2003). Voluntary Action. Science and Consciousness Review 8:1-2.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Morten Overgaard & Soeren Willert (2003). On the Encompassing of the Behaviour of Man. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):615-616.
    One supposition underlying the Anderson & Lebiere (A&L) target article is that the maximally broad “encompassing of its subject matter – the behavior of man” (cf. sect. 6, last para.) is regarded as an unquestioned quality criterion for guiding cognitive research. One might argue for an explicit specification of the limitations of a given paradigm, rather than extending it to apply to as many domains as possible.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. M. Overgaard, O. Kauffmann & T. Z. Ramsøy (2001). Consciousness and Introspection, Toward a Science of Consciousness: Consciousness Research Abstracts. Journal of Consciousness Studies 182.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. M. Overgaard, O. Kauffmann & T. Z. Ramsøy (2001). Consciousness and Introspection. Journal of Consciousness Studies: Consciousness Research Abstract 182.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Morten Overgaard (2001). The Role of Phenomenological Reports in Experiments on Consciousness. Psycoloquy 12 (29):1-10.
  31. Morten Overgaard, Problems in the "Functional" Investigations of Consciousness.
    This article presents the view that the “problem of consciousness” – per definition – can not be seen as a strictly scientific or strictly philosophical problem. The first idea, especially, leads to important difficulties: First of all, the idea has in most cases implied some rather superficial reductionistic or functionalistic a priori assumptions, and, secondly, it can be shown that some of the most commonly used empirical methods in these regards are inadequate. Especially so in the case of contrastive analysis, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
Is this list right?