Jason Taylor University of Alberta

  • Faculty, University of Alberta
  • PhD, University of Alberta, 2012.

Areas of specialization

Areas of interest

About me
Not much to say..
My works
5 items found.
  1. Joel Buenting & Jason Taylor (forthcoming). Fortuitous Data and Conspiracy Theories. Journal of the Philosophy of Social Sciences.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  2.  4
    Jason Taylor & Christopher Johnson (2014). Virtuous Victory: Running Up the Score and the Anti-Blowout Thesis. Philosophical Explorations 41 (2):247-266.
    A difficult question in the philosophy of sport concerns how winning athletes should perform in uneven contests in which victory has been secured well before the competition is over. Nicholas Dixon, the protagonist in the ongoing debate, argues against critics who urge following an 'anti-blowout' thesis that there is nothing intrinsically wrong with running up the score. We engage this debate, providing much needed distinctions, and draw on Aristotelian resources to explore a framework by which to understand competing claims found (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  3.  43
    J. Buenting & J. Taylor (2010). Conspiracy Theories and Fortuitous Data. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4):567-578.
    We offer a particularist defense of conspiratorial thinking. We explore the possibility that the presence of a certain kind of evidence—what we call "fortuitous data"—lends rational credence to conspiratorial thinking. In developing our argument, we introduce conspiracy theories and motivate our particularist approach (§1). We then introduce and define fortuitous data (§2). Lastly, we locate an instance of fortuitous data in one real world conspiracy, the Watergate scandal (§3).
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  4.  26
    Jason Taylor (2009). Dis-Unified Pluralist Accounts of Causation. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (3):388-401.
    One way of assessing the philosophical literature on causation is to consider views on the nature of the causal relation. Early theorists were 'monists', taking there to be one causal relation. More recent theorists, however, have turned to pluralism, which holds that the causal relation is only accurately captured by two (or more) relations. I argue that one way of being a pluralist – the way which takes there to be exactly two types of causation – is self defeating, if (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  5.  2
    Nathan D. Smith & Jason P. Taylor (eds.) (2005). Descartes and Cartesianism. Cambridge Scholars Press.
    PART ONE: Chapter 1 The Baconian Matrix of Descartes's Regulae Robert C. Miner For traditional histories of philosophy ...
      Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
Is this list right?