Alexander Skiles University of Neuchatel
Contact

Affiliations
  • Postdoc, University of Neuchatel
  • PhD, University of Notre Dame, 2013.

Areas of specialization

Areas of interest

Edited categories

blank
About me
Not much to say..
My works
8 items found.
Sort by:
  1. Alexander Skiles (forthcoming). Against Grounding Necessitarianism. Erkenntnis.
    Can there be grounding without necessitation? That is, can a fact obtain wholly in virtue of metaphysically more fundamental facts even though there are possible worlds at which the latter facts obtain but not the former? It is an orthodoxy in recent literature about the nature of grounding, and in first-order philosophical disputes about what grounds what, that the answer is no. I will argue that the correct answer is yes. I present two novel arguments against grounding necessitarianism, and then (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Alexander Skiles (forthcoming). Is There a Dilemma for the Truthmaker Non-Maximalist? Synthese:1-11.
    Mark Jago has presented a dilemma for truthmaker non-maximalism—the thesis that some but not all truths require truthmakers—that arises because some truths that do not require truthmakers by the non-maximalist’s lights (e.g., that Santa Claus does not exist) are necessitated by truths that do (e.g., that Barack Obama knows that Santa Claus does not exist). According to Jago, the non-maximalist can supply a truthmaker for such a truth only by conceding the primary motivation for the view: that it allows one (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Alexander Skiles (forthcoming). Primitivism About Intrinsicality. In Robert Francescotti (ed.), Companion to Intrinsic Properties. De Gruyter.
  4. Alexander Skiles (2014). Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality Edited by Fabrice Correia and Benjamin Schnieder. Analysis 74 (3):543-546.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Akiko Frischhut & Alexander Skiles (2013). Time, Modality, and the Unbearable Lightness of Being. Thought 2 (1):264-273.
    We develop a theory about the metaphysics of time and modality that combines the conceptual resources devised in recent sympathetic work on ontological pluralism (the thesis that there are fundamentally distinct kinds of being) with the thought that what is past, future, and merely possible is less real than what is present and actual (albeit real enough to serve as truthmakers for statements about the past, future, and merely possible). However, we also show that despite being a coherent, distinctive, and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Alexander Skiles (2013). Getting Grounded: Essays in the Metaphysics of Fundamentality. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
    When doing metaphysics, it is frequently convenient and sometimes essential to rely upon various notions of fundamentality when articulating the problems, positions, and arguments at issue. But what it is, exactly, the relevant notions are supposed to track remains obscure. The goal of this dissertation is to develop and defend a theory about the metaphysics of fundamentality; by doing so, I clarify and vindicate the roles that notions of fundamentality play in metaphysics. At the theory’s core are two notions particularly (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Katherine Brading & Alexander Skiles (2012). Underdetermination as a Path to Structural Realism. In Elaine Landry & Dean Rickles (eds.), Structural Realism: Structure, Object, and Causality. Springer.
  8. Alexander Skiles (2009). Trogdon on Monism and Intrinsicality. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):149 – 154.
    Kelly Trogdon [2009] argues that priority monism—here, the view that only the world as a whole has fundamental properties—conflicts with the best extant accounts of intrinsicality. He then proposes an alternative account that is designed to be not only compatible with this view, but also independently plausible. But his account conflicts with priority monism as well, and incorrectly classifies various non-intrinsic properties.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
Is this list right?