Matthew J. Brown University of Texas at Dallas, University of Texas at Dallas
Contact

Affiliations
  • Faculty, University of Texas at Dallas
  • Administrator, University of Texas at Dallas
  • PhD, University of California, San Diego, 2009.

Areas of specialization

Areas of interest

My philosophical views

Edited categories

blank
About me
Assistant Professor of Philosophy in the School of Arts & Humanities at the University of Texas at Dallas. My main area of research is in the area of science and values, broadly construed.
My works
36 items found.
Sort by:
  1. Matthew J. Brown (forthcoming). The Democratic Control of the Scientific Control of Democracy. In Dennis Dieks & Vassilios Karakostas (eds.), Recent Progress in Philosophy of Science: Perspectives and Foundational Problems. Springer.
    I will discuss for two popular but apparently contradictory theses: T1. The democratic control of science – the aims and activities of science should be subject to public scrutiny via democratic processes of representation and participation. T2. The scientific control of policy, i.e. technocracy – political pro- cesses should be problem-solving pursuits determined by the methods and results of science and technology. Many arguments can be given for (T1), both epistemic and moral/political; I will focus on an argument based on (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Matthew J. Brown (2013). The Source and Status of Values for Socially Responsible Science. Philosophical Studies 163 (1):67-76.
    Philosophy of Science After Feminism is an important contribution to philosophy of science, in that it argues for the central relevance of advances from previous work in feminist philosophy of science and articulates a new vision for philosophy of science going in to the future. Kourany’s vision of philosophy of science’s future as “socially engaged and socially responsible” and addressing questions of the social responsibility of science itself has much to recommend it. I focus the book articulation of an ethical-epistemic (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Matthew J. Brown, Inquiry and Evidence: From the Experimenter's Regress to Evidence-Based Policy.
    In the first part of this paper, I will sketch the main features of traditional models of evidence, indicating idealizations in such models that I regard as doing more harm than good. I will then proceed to elaborate on an alternative model of evidence that is functionalist, complex, dynamic, and contextual, which I will call DYNAMIC EVIDENTIAL FUNCTIONALISM. I will demonstrate its application to an illuminating example of scientific inquiry, and defend it from some likely objections. In the second part, (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Matthew J. Brown & Joyce C. Havstad, The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change: A Feminist Pragmatist Perspective.
    We offer a critical analysis of the science and politics of global climate change from a feminist pragmatist perspective, with special attention to the interactions between science and policy. We find the current state of play in all three areas (science, policy, and the space of interaction between them) to be lacking. We attribute mutual responsibility for the current impasse in addressing the climate crisis. What is called for is an alternative framework for thinking about science and policy interactions, which (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Matthew J. Brown (forthcoming). A Companion to Pragmatism (Review). The Pluralist 6 (2):101-103.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Matthew J. Brown (2015). The Functional Complexity of Scientific Evidence. Metaphilosophy 46 (1):65-83.
    This article sketches the main features of traditional philosophical models of evidence, indicating idealizations in such models that it regards as doing more harm than good. It then proceeds to elaborate on an alternative model of evidence that is functionalist, complex, dynamic, and contextual, a view the author calls dynamic evidential functionalism . This alternative builds on insights from philosophy of scientific practice, Kuhnian philosophy of science, pragmatist epistemology, philosophy of experimentation, and functionalist philosophy of mind. Along the way, the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Matthew J. Brown (2014). Quantum Frames. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 45 (1):1-10.
    The framework of quantum frames can help unravel some of the interpretive difficulties i the foundation of quantum mechanics. In this paper, I begin by tracing the origins of this concept in Bohr's discussion of quantum theory and his theory of complementarity. Engaging with various interpreters and followers of Bohr, I argue that the correct account of quantum frames must be extended beyond literal space–time reference frames to frames defined by relations between a quantum system and the exosystem or external (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Matthew J. Brown (2014). Values in Science Beyond Underdetermination and Inductive Risk. Philosophy of Science 80 (5):829-839.
    Proponents of the value ladenness of science rely primarily on arguments from underdetermination or inductive risk, which share the premise that we should only consider values where the evidence runs out or leaves uncertainty; they adopt a criterion of lexical priority of evidence over values. The motivation behind lexical priority is to avoid reaching conclusions on the basis of wishful thinking rather than good evidence. This is a real concern, however, that giving lexical priority to evidential considerations over values is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Matthew J. Brown (2013). Science, Values, and Democracy in the Global Climate Change Debate. In Shane Ralston (ed.), Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations: Essays for a Bold New World. Lexington. 127-158.
    This chapter will develop and apply ideas drawn from and inspired by Dewey’s work on science and democracy to the context of international relations (IR). I will begin with Dewey’s views on the nature of democracy, which lead us into his philosophy of science. I will show that scientific and policy inquiry are inextricably related processes, and that they both have special requirements in a democratic context. There are some challenges applying these ideas to the IR case, but these challenges (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Matthew J. Brown (2013). The Democratic Control of the Scientific Control of Politics. In Vassilios Karakostas & Dennis Dieks (eds.), Epsa11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science. Springer. 479--491.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Brian E. Butler, Matthew J. Brown, Phillip Deen, Loren Goldman, John Kaag, John Ryder, Patricia Shields, Joseph Soeters & Eric Weber (2013). Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations: Essays for a Bold New World. Lexington Books.
    Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations bridges the gap between philosophical pragmatism and international relations, two disciplinary perspectives that together shed light on how to advance the study and conduct of foreign affairs. Authors in this collection discuss a broad range of issues, from policy relevance to peacekeeping operations, with an eye to understanding how this distinctly American philosophy, pragmatism, can improve both international relations research and foreign policy practice.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Matthew J. Brown (2012). John Dewey's Logic of Science. Hopos 2 (2):258-306.
    In recent years, pragmatism in general and John Dewey in particular have been of increasing interest to philosophers of science. Dewey's work provides an interesting alternative package of views to those which derive from the logical empiricists and their critics, on problems of both traditional and more recent vintage. Dewey's work ought to be of special interest to recent philosophers of science committed to the program of analyzing ``science in practice.'' The core of Dewey's philosophy of science is his theory (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Michael Brodrick, Clara Fischer, Matthew J. Brown, David W. Agler, Brian G. Henning, Albert D. Spalding Jr, James Campbell & John J. McDermott (2011). 10. Emerson and Thoreau: Figures of Friendship, Ed. John T. Lysaker and William Rossi Emerson and Thoreau: Figures of Friendship, Ed. John T. Lysaker and William Rossi (Pp. 91-95). [REVIEW] The Pluralist 6 (2).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Matthew J. Brown (2011). A Companion to Pragmatism, Ed. John R. Shook and Joseph Margolis A Companion to Pragmatism Shook, Editor John R. Margolis, Editor Joseph Blackwell , Oxford, Eng. [REVIEW] The Pluralist 6 (2):101-103.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Matthew J. Brown (2011). A Companion to Pragmatism, Ed. John R. Shook and Joseph Margolis. The Pluralist 6 (2):101-103.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Matthew J. Brown (2011). Science as Socially Distributed Cognition: Bridging Philosophy and Sociology of Science. In Karen François, Benedikt Löwe, Thomas Müller & Bart van Kerkhove (eds.), Foundations of the Formal Sciences VII, Studies in Logic. College Publications.
    I want to make plausible the following claim:Analyzing scientific inquiry as a species of socially distributed cognition has a variety of advantages for science studies, among them the prospects of bringing together philosophy and sociology of science. This is not a particularly novel claim, but one that faces major obstacles. I will retrace some of the major steps that have been made in the pursuit of a distributed cognition approach to science studies, paying special attention to the promise that such (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Dawn Abt-Perkins, Ruth Balf, Matthew Brown, Jacqueline Deal, Elizabeth Dutro, Kimberly Adilia Helmer, Stephanie Jones, Elham Kazemi, Aaron Kuntz, Kysa Nygreen, Eileen Carlton Parsons, Melanie Shoffner, Steven Wall & Victoria Whitefield (2010). Culturally Relevant Pedagogy: Clashes and Confrontations. R&L Education.
    The authors in this edited volume reflect on their experiences with culturally relevant pedagogy-as students, as teachers, as researchers-and how these experiences were often at odds with their backgrounds and/or expectations.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Matthew Brown (2010). Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation by Mark B. Brown. [REVIEW] Isis 101:686-687.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Matthew J. Brown (2010). Mark B. Brown. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Mark B. Brown. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. (Book Review). [REVIEW] Isis 101 (3):686--687.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Matthew J. Brown (2010). Genuine Problems and the Significance of Science. Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (2):131-153.
    This paper addresses the political constraints on science through a pragmatist critique of Philip Kitcher’s account of “well-ordered science.” A central part of Kitcher’s account is his analysis of the significance of items of scientific research: contextual and purpose-relative scientific significance replaces mere truth as the aim of inquiry. I raise problems for Kitcher’s account and argue for an alternative, drawing on Peirce’s and Dewey’s theories of problem-solving inquiry. I conclude by suggesting some consequences for understanding the proper conduct of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Matthew J. Brown (2009). Models and Perspectives on Stage: Remarks on Giere's Scientific Perspectivism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):213-220.
    Ron Giere's recent book Scientific Perspectivism sets out an account of science that attempts to forge a via media between two popular extremes: absolutist, objectivist realism on the one hand, and social constructivism or skeptical anti-realism on the other. The key for Giere is to treat both scientific observation and scientific theories as perspectives, which are limited, partial, contingent, context-, agent- and purpose-dependent, and pluralism-friendly, while nonetheless world-oriented and modestly realist. Giere's perspectivism bears significant similarly to early writings by Paul (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Matthew J. Brown (2009). Relational Quantum Mechanics and the Determinacy Problem. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):679-695.
    Carlo Rovelli's relational interpretation of quantum mechanics holds that a system's states or the values of its physical quantities as normally conceived only exist relative to a cut between a system and an observer or measuring instrument. Furthermore, on Rovelli's account, the appearance of determinate observations from pure quantum superpositions happens only relative to the interaction of the system and observer. Jeffrey Barrett ([1999]) has pointed out that certain relational interpretations suffer from what we might call the ‘determinacy problem', but (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Matthew J. Brown (2009). Science and Experience: A Deweyan Pragmatist Philosophy of Science. Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
    I resolve several pressing and recalcitrant problems in contemporary philosophy of science using resources from John Dewey's philosophy of science. I begin by looking at Dewey's epistemological and logical writings in their historical context, in order to understand better how Dewey's philosophy disappeared from the limelight, and I provide a reconstruction of his views. Then, I use that reconstruction to address problems of evidence, the social dimensions of science, and pluralism. Generally, mainstream philosophers of science with an interest in Dewey (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. R. Boyd, M. Brown, S. C. Brown, J. C. Bryce, J. Buchanan, C. Bulcaen, S. Burks, M. F. Bumyeat, G. Busino & C. Castelfranchi (2008). 290/Name Index Bouchaud, JP 112,116 Bousquet, GH 230 Bovens. L. 3, 61,139 Bowles, S. 216,229. In Maria-Carla Galavotti (ed.), Reasoning, Rationality and Probability. Csli Publications. 289.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Matthew J. Brown (2007). Picky Eating is a Moral Failing. In Dave Monroe & Fritz Allhoff (eds.), Food & Philosophy: Eat, Think, and Be Merry. Blackwell.
    Common wisdom includes expressions such as “there is no accounting for taste'’ that express a widely-accepted subjectivism about taste. We commonly say things like “I can’t stand anything with onions in it'’ or “Oh, I’d never eat sushi,'’ and we accept such from our friends and associates. It is the position of this essay that much of this language is actually quite unacceptable. Without appealing to complete objectivism about taste, I will argue that there are good reasons to think that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Matthew J. Brown (2006). On What Quine Is: A Review of the Cambridge Companion to Quine. [REVIEW] Mind, Culture, and Activity 13 (4):339-343.
    A book review from the Quine volume of The Cambridge Companions to Philosophy series.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Matthew Brown & Derek Besner (2004). In Sight but Out of Mind: Do Competing Views Test the Limits of Perception Without Awareness? Consciousness and Cognition 13 (2):421-429.
    Over a century’s worth of research suggests that “perception” without awareness is a genuine phenomenon. However, relatively little research has explored the question of whether all visually presented information activates representations in long term memory without awareness. Two experiments explored the use of a figure–ground display consisting of competing views in which one view dominates the other such that subjects are unaware of the non-dominant view. Neither experiment provided evidence that the non-dominant view activated its representation in long term memory (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Matthew Brown, Derek Besner, Daniel T. Levin & Donald A. Varakin (2004). Larry Cahill, Lukasz Gorski, Annabelle Belcher, and Quyen Huynh. The Influence of Sex Versus Sex-Related Traits on Long-Term. Consciousness and Cognition 13:212.
  29. M. Brown, I. Belova & G. Murch (2003). Prediction of Kinetic Demixing in a Quaternary Mixed Oxide O in an Oxygen Potential Gradient. Philosophical Magazine 83 (16):1855-1865.
    Kinetic demixing in quaternary mixed oxides has not been investigated previously, either theoretically or experimentally. In this theoretical study, we derive simple and exact analytical expressions that describe the steady-state cation concentration profiles resulting from kinetic demixing in mixed oxides of the O type. The concentration profiles are expressed in terms of cation-vacancy exchange frequency ratios. We assume a random distribution of cations and make use of the Moleko-Allnatt exact sum-rule expression relating the phenomenological coefficients in the ternary random alloy (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. M. Brown (2002). 'Don Quixote'(Art). Journal of Aesthetic Education 36 (2):180-180.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Robert West, Douglas F. Watt, P. Andrew Leynes, Christopher B. Mayhorn, Alfred Buck, Dawn M. McBride, Barbara Anne Dosher, Matthew Brown, Derek Besner & Alain Morin (2002). Jonathan Smallwood, Marc Obonsawin, and Derek Heim. Task Unrelated Thought: The Role Of. Consciousness and Cognition 11:375.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. M. Brown & R. Miles (2000). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Theory, Culture and Society 17 (1):171-175.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. B. Aldag, G. Antoniou, T. Aoto, P. Blackburn, K. Britz, M. Brown, A. Bundy, R. Cox, M. De Rijke & S. Demri (1999). Index of Authors of Volume 8. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 8 (485):485.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. M. Brown & G. Paliouras (1996). Roger C. Schank, Alex Kass, and Christopher K. Riesbeck (Eds.) Inside Case-Based Explanation. Minds and Machines 6:279-285.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Matthew S. McGlone, Sam Glucksberg & M. Brown (1991). When is Love a Journey-What Metaphors and Idioms Mean. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):506-506.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Matthew J. Brown, A Centennial Retrospective of John Dewey's "The Influence of Darwinism on Philosophy".
    n 1909, the 50th anniversary of both the publication of Origin of the Species and his own birth, John Dewey published "The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy." This optimistic essay saw Darwin's advance not only as one of empirical or theoretical biology, but a logical and conceptual revolution that would shake every corner of philosophy. Dewey tells us less about the influence that Darwin exerted over philosophy over the past 50 years and instead prophesied the influence it would take in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
Is this list right?