Year:

Forthcoming articles
  1. Jonas Åkerman (forthcoming). Infelicitous Cancellation: The Explicit Cancellability Test for Conversational Implicature Revisited. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-10.
    This paper questions the adequacy of the explicit cancellability test for conversational implicature as it is commonly understood. The standard way of understanding this test relies on two assumptions: First, that one can test whether a certain content is (merely) conversationally implicated by checking whether that content is cancellable, and second, that a cancellation is successful only if it results in a felicitous utterance. While I accept the first of these assumptions, I reject the second one. I argue that a (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Chad Carmichael (forthcoming). Toward a Commonsense Answer to the Special Composition Question. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-16.
    The special composition question is the question ‘When do some things compose something?’ The answers to this question in the literature have largely been at odds with common sense, either by allowing that any two things (no matter how apparently unrelated) compose something, or by denying the existence of most ordinary composite objects. I propose a new “series-style” answer to the special composition question that accords much more closely with common sense, and I defend this answer from van Inwagen’s objections. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Charles B. Cross (forthcoming). A Logical Transmission Principle for Conclusive Reasons. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-18.
    Dretske's conclusive reasons account of knowledge is designed to explain how epistemic closure can fail when the evidence for a belief does not transmit to some of that belief's logical consequences. Critics of Dretske dispute the argument against closure while joining Dretske in writing off transmission. This paper shows that, in the most widely accepted system for counterfactual logic , conclusive reasons are governed by an informative, non-trivial, logical transmission principle. If r is a conclusive reason for believing p in (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Theodore J. Everett (forthcoming). Peer Disagreement and Two Principles of Rational Belief. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-14.
    This paper presents a new solution to the problem of peer disagreement that distinguishes two principles of rational belief, here called probability and autonomy. When we discover that we disagree with peers, there is one sense in which we rationally ought to suspend belief, and another in which we rationally ought to retain our original belief. In the first sense, we aim to believe what is most probably true according to our total evidence, including testimony from peers and authorities. In (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Marion Godman (forthcoming). The Special Science Dilemma and How Culture Solves It. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-18.
    I argue that there is a tension between the claim that at least some kinds in the special sciences are multiply realized and the claim that the reason kinds are prized by science is that they enter into a variety of different empirical generalizations. Nevertheless, I show that this tension ceases in the case of ‘cultural homologues’–such as specific ideologies, religions, and folk wisdom. I argue that the instances of such special science kinds do have several projectable properties in common (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Ned Markosian (forthcoming). The Right Stuff. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-23.
    This paper argues for including stuff in one's ontology. The distinction between things and stuff is first clarified, and then three different ontologies of the physical universe are spelled out: a pure thing ontology, a pure stuff ontology, and a mixed ontology of both things and stuff. Eleven different reasons for including stuff in one's ontology are given . Then five objections to positing stuff are considered and rejected.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Robin McKenna (forthcoming). Assertion, Complexity, and Sincerity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-17.
    The target of this paper is the ‘simple’ knowledge account of assertion, according to which assertion is constituted by a single epistemic rule of the form ‘One must: assert p only if one knows p’ . My aim is to argue that those who are attracted to a knowledge account of assertion should prefer what I call the ‘complex’ knowledge account, according to which assertion is constituted by a system of rules all of which are, taken together, constitutive of assertion. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Daniel Nolan (forthcoming). The A Posteriori Armchair. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-21.
    A lot of good philosophy is done in the armchair, but is nevertheless a posteriori. This paper clarifies and then defends that claim. Among the a posteriori activities done in the armchair are assembling and evaluating commonplaces; formulating theoretical alternatives; and integrating well-known past a posteriori discoveries. The activity that receives the most discussion, however, is the application of theoretical virtues to choose philosophical theories: the paper argues that much of this is properly seen as a posteriori.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Rik Peels (forthcoming). Believing at Will is Possible. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-18.
    There are convincing counter-examples to the widely accepted thesis that we cannot believe at will. For it seems possible that the truth of a proposition depend on whether or not one believes it. I call such scenarios cases of Truth Depends on Belief (TDB) and I argue that they meet the main criteria for believing at will that we find in the literature. I reply to five objections that one might level against the thesis that TDB cases show that believing (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Robert D. Rupert (forthcoming). Review of Jerry Fodor, LOT 2. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jonathan Schaffer (forthcoming). What Not to Multiply Without Necessity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-21.
    The Razor commands us not to multiply entities without necessity. I argue for an alternative principle—The Laser—which commands us not to multiply fundamental entities without necessity.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Keith Allen (forthcoming). Hallucination And Imagination. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-16.
    What are hallucinations? A common view in the philosophical literature is that hallucinations are degenerate kinds of perceptual experience. I argue instead that hallucinations are degenerate kinds of sensory imagination. As well as providing a good account of many actual cases of hallucination, the view that hallucination is a kind of imagination represents a promising account of hallucination from the perspective of a disjunctivist theory of perception like naïve realism. This is because it provides a way of giving a positive (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Peter Balint (forthcoming). Book Note. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Ermanno Bencivenga (forthcoming). Realizing Reason: A Narrative of Truth and Knowing, by Danielle Macbeth. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-3.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Andrea Borghini (forthcoming). A Critical Introduction to Skepticism by Allan Hazlett. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jennifer Corns (forthcoming). The Social Pain Posit. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-22.
    Although discussion of social pain has become popular among researchers in psychology and behavioural neuroscience, the philosophical community has yet to pay it any direct attention. Social pain is characterized as the emotional reaction to the perception of the loss or devaluation of desired relationships. These are argued to comprise a pain type and are explicitly intended to include the everyday sub-types grief, jealousy, heartbreak, rejection, and hurt feelings. Social pain is accordingly posited as a nested type of pain encompassing (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Damon Crockett (forthcoming). Surface Colour is Not a Perceptual Content. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-16.
    In this paper, I consider a view that explains colour experience by the independent representation of surface and illumination. This view implies that surface colour is a phenomenal perceptual content. I argue from facts of colour phenomenology to the conclusion that surface colour is not a phenomenal perceptual content. I then argue from results of surface-matching experiments to the conclusion that surface colour is neither a perceptual content of any kind nor any sort of computational output of the perceptual system. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Oisín Deery (forthcoming). The Fall From Eden: Why Libertarianism Isn't Justified By Experience. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-16.
    Libertarians claim that our experience of free choice is indeterministic. They think that, when we choose, our choice feels open in a way that would require indeterminism for the experience to be accurate. This claim then functions as a step in an argument in favour of libertarianism, the view that freedom requires indeterminism and we are free. Since, all else being equal, we should take experience at face value, libertarians argue, we should endorse libertarianism. Compatibilists, who think that freedom is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Matt Duncan (forthcoming). I Think, Therefore I Persist. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-17.
    Suppose that you're lying in bed. You just woke up. But you're alert. Your mind is clear and you have no distractions. As you lie there, you think to yourself, ‘2 + 2 = 4.’ The thought just pops into your head. But, wanting to be sure of your mathematical insight, you once again think ‘2 + 2 = 4’, this time really meditating on your thought. Now suppose that you're sitting in an empty movie theatre. The lighting is normal (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Mary Louise Gill (forthcoming). How Aristotle Gets by in Metaphysics Zeta, by Frank A. Lewis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-3.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Theodore Gracyk (forthcoming). Critique of Pure Music, by James O. Young. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-3.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Mario Graziano (forthcoming). Genetics and Philosophy by Paul Griffiths and Karola Stotz. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Michael LeBuffe (forthcoming). A Sentimentalist Theory of Mind, by Slote, Michael Oxford. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Graham Oppy (forthcoming). Analysis of Existing: Barry Miller's Approach to God, by Kremer, Elmar J. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. James I. Porter (forthcoming). The Poetics of Phantasia: Imagination in Ancient Aesthetics, by Anne Sheppard. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Sagar Sanyal (forthcoming). Truly Human Enhancement: A Philosophical Defense of Limits, Agar, Nicholas. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Emma Wood (forthcoming). Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence, by Olson, Jonas. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Moira Gatens (forthcoming). Book Note. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. J. Adam Carter & Duncan Pritchard (forthcoming). Knowledge-How and Epistemic Value. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-18.
    A conspicuous oversight in recent debates about the vexed problem of the value of knowledge has been the value of knowledge-how. This would not be surprising if knowledge-how were, as Gilbert Ryle [1945, 1949] famously thought, fundamentally different from knowledge-that. However, reductive intellectualists [e.g. Stanley and Williamson 2001; Brogaard 2008, 2009, 2011; Stanley 2011a, 2011b] maintain that knowledge-how just is a kind of knowledge-that. Accordingly, reductive intellectualists must predict that the value problems facing propositional knowledge will equally apply to knowledge-how. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Nomy Arpaly (forthcoming). Consciousness and Moral Responsibility, by Neil Levy. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-3.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Saba Bazargan (forthcoming). Defensive Wars and the Reprisal Dilemma. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-19.
    I address a foundational problem with accounts of the morality of war that are derived from the Just War Tradition . Such accounts problematically focus on ‘the moment of crisis’: i.e. when a state is considering a resort to war. This is problematic because sometimes the state considering the resort to war is partly responsible for wrongly creating the conditions in which the resort to war becomes necessary. By ignoring this possibility, JWT effectively ignores, in its moral evaluation of wars, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jc Beall (forthcoming). Eco-Logical Lives: The Philosophical Lives of Richard Routley/Sylvan and Val Routley/Plumwood, by Hyde, Dominic. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-3.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Bridget Clarke (forthcoming). Book Note. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Richard Colledge (forthcoming). Book Note. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Frederique de Vignemont (forthcoming). Pain and Bodily Care: Whose Body Matters? Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-19.
    Pain is unpleasant. It is something that one avoids as much as possible. One might then claim that one wants to avoid pain because one cares about one's body. On this view, individuals who do not experience pain as unpleasant and to be avoided, like patients with pain asymbolia, do not care about their body. This conception of pain has been recently defended by Bain [2014] and Klein [forthcoming]. In their view, one needs to care about one's body for pain (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Phil Dowe (forthcoming). Book Note. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Catarina Dutilh Novaes (forthcoming). Articulating Medieval Logic, by Parsons, Terence. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-3.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Daniel Greco (forthcoming). Epistemological Open Questions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-15.
    While there has been a great deal of recent interest in parallels between metaethics and metaepistemology, there has been little discussion of epistemological analogues of the open question argument . This is somewhat surprising—the general trend in recent work is in the direction of emphasizing the continuity between metaethics and metaepistemology, and to treat metanormative questions as arising in parallel in these two normative domains. And while the OQA has been subjected to a wide variety of objections, it is still (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Nicole Hassoun (forthcoming). Eternally Separated Lovers: The Argument From Love. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-11.
    A message scribbled irreverently on the mediaeval walls of the Nonberg cloister says this: ‘Neither of us can go to heaven unless the other gets in.’ It suggests an argument against the view that those who love people who suffer in hell can be perfectly happy, or even free from all suffering, in heaven. This paper considers the challenge posed by this thought to the coherence of the traditional Christian doctrine on which there are some people in hell who are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Soraj Hongladarom (forthcoming). A Review of “Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life”, by Pereboom, Derk. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Jens Johansson (forthcoming). Review of Robert E. Goodin, On Settling (Princeton UP, 2012). [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Michael D. Kirchhoff (forthcoming). Species of Realization and the Free Energy Principle. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-18.
    This paper examines, for the first time, the relationship between realization relations and the free energy principle in cognitive neuroscience. I argue, firstly, that the free energy principle has ramifications for the wide versus narrow realization distinction: if the free energy principle is correct, then organismic realizers are insufficient for realizing free energy minimization. I argue, secondly, that the free energy principle has implications for synchronic realization relations, because free energy minimization is realized in dynamical agent-environment couplings embedded at multiple (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. G. R. McLean (forthcoming). A Review of “The Handbook of Virtue Ethics”, Ed., van Hooft, Stan. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Jens David Ohlin (forthcoming). A Review of “The Morality of Defensive War”, Eds., Fabre, Cécile, and Seth Lazar. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Jaroslav Peregrin (forthcoming). What Logics Mean: From Proof Theory to Model-Theoretic Semantics, by James W. Garson. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-4.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Andrew Rotondo (forthcoming). Book Note. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Andrew Rotondo (forthcoming). Disagreement and Intellectual Scepticism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-21.
    Several philosophers have recently argued that disagreement with others undermines or precludes epistemic justification for our opinions about controversial issues . This amounts to a fascinating and disturbing kind of intellectual scepticism. A crucial piece of the sceptical argument, however, is that our opponents on such topics are epistemic peers. In this paper, I examine the reasons for why we might think that our opponents really are such peers, and I argue that those reasons are either too weak or too (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues