Year:

  1.  3
    Nina Belmonte (2016). Paul Bowman, Ed. Rancière and Film. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (2):50-53.
    The first collection of critical essays on the film work of the philosopher Jacques Ranciere. Jacques Ranciere rose to prominence as a radical egalitarian philosopher, political theorist and historian. Recently he has intervened into the discourses of film theory and film studies, publishing controversial and challenging works on these topics. This book offers an exciting range of responses to and assessments of his contributions to film studies and includes an afterword response to the essays by Ranciere himself.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  3
    Giacomo Borbone (2016). G. W. F. Hegel. Lectures on the Philosophy of Art. The Hotho Transcript of the 1823 Berlin Lectures. Ed. And Trans. Robert F. Brown. Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 36 (2):76-78.
    Review of Hegelian Lectures on Philosophy of Art translated by Robert F. Brown.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  2
    Fabrice Bothereau (2016). Michael S. Brady. Emotional Insight: The Epistemic Role of Emotional Experience. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (2):54-57.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  3
    Stephen Boulter (2016). John Marenbon, Ed. Continuity and Innovation in Medieval and Modern Philosophy: Knowledge, Mind, and Language. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (2):79-82.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  4
    Jeff Brown (2016). Benoit Dillet, Lain MacKenzie and Robert Porter, Eds. The Edinburgh Companion to Poststructuralism. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (2):70-72.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  2
    Stuart Dalton (2016). Niels Jørgen Cappelørn, Alastair Hannay, David Kangas, Bruce H. Kirmmse, George Pattison, Joel D. S. Rasmussen, Vanessa Rumble, and K. Brian Söderquist, Eds. Kierkegaard’s Journals and Notebooks. Volume 6 and 7. Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 36 (2):63-66.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  4
    Stephen Hawkins (2016). Paul Fairfield. Death: A Philosophical Inquiry. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (2):73-75.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  2
    Thomas Johnson (2016). Rowan Cruft, S. Matthew Liao, and Massimo Renzo, Eds. Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (2):67-69.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  3
    Aaron Landry (2016). Laurie J. Shrage and Robert Scott Stewart. Philosophizing About Sex. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (2):86-88.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  3
    Seamus O'Neill (2016). Neera K. Badhwar, Well Being: Happiness in a Worthwhile Life. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (2):47-49.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  3
    Sanna Pederson (2016). James O. Young. Critique of Pure Music. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (2):89-90.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  3
    Vladimir Rizov (2016). Marc Augé, The Future. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (2):44-46.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  3
    Vladimir D. Thomas (2016). Alastair V. Campbell, Bioethics: The Basics. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (2):61-62.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  3
    Diane Williamson (2016). Gillian Brock, Ed. Cosmopolitanism Versus Non-Cosmopolitanism: Critiques, Defenses, Reconceptualizations. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (2):58-60.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  3
    James Young (2016). Dominic McIver Lopes, Beyond Art. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (2):83-85.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  10
    Christopher Bartel (2016). Nick Zangwill, Music and Aesthetic Reality: Formalism and the Limits of Description. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (1):42-43.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  6
    Jason Costanzo (2016). Christopher Peacocke, The Mirror of the World: Subjects, Consciousness, and Self-Consciousness. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (1):20-22.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  6
    Daniel Gallagher (2016). Kevin Flannery, Action and Character According to Aristotle: The Logic of the Moral Life. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (1):9-10.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  5
    Aaron Landry (2016). Susan Wolf and Christopher Grau, Eds., Understanding Love: Philosophy, Film, and Fiction. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (1):36-38.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  10
    Neil Levy (2016). George Graham, The Abraham Dilemma: A Divine Delusion. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (1):11-13.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  6
    Liam Patrick Moore (2016). Christian Coons and Michael Weber, Eds., Manipulation: Theory and Practice. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (1):1-3.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  6
    Stephen R. Palmquist (2016). Christopher J. Insole, Kant and the Creation of Freedom: A Theological Problem. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (1):14-16.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  8
    Vladimir Rizov (2016). Mark Currie, The Unexpected: Narrative Temporality and the Philosophy of Surprise. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (1):4-6.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  7
    Mohammad Mahdi Sadrforati (2016). David J. Stump, Conceptual Change and the Philosophy of Science: Alternative Interpretations of the A Priori. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (1):33-35.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  8
    John Andrew Scott (2016). Jacques Ellul, On Freedom, Love, and Power. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (1):7-8.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  6
    Robert Sinclair (2016). Philip Kitcher, Life After Faith: The Case for Secular Humanism. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (1):17-19.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  6
    Katie Terezakis (2016). Gary Steiner, Animals and the Limits of Postmodernism. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (1):30-32.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  7
    Steven Tester (2016). Julian Wuerth, Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (1):39-41.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  2
    Adam Tamas Tuboly (2016). Friedrich Stadler, The Vienna Circle: Studies in the Origins, Development, and Influence of Logical Empiricism. Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 36 (1):26-29.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  5
    Iris Vidmar (2016). Peter Swirski, Stanislaw Lem: Philosopher of the Future. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 36 (1):23-25.
    Stanislaw Lem, Philosopher of the Future is a revealing and instructive guide to the philosophical fiction of Stanislaw Lem. Throughout the book, Swirski builds a framework of philosophical and scientific concepts within which Lem’s works should be read, in particular its most significant aspect: Lem’s unyielding concern for knowledge supported by his conviction that literature is an epistemologically valuable tool for exploring reality. Swirski offers a rich background to Lem's litrary career and unravels the depths of Lem’s philosophical fiction.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues