Year:

  1. Miroslav Hanke (2014). Paradox Lháře Ve Světle Scholastických Klasifikací. Studia Neoaristotelica 11 (3):73-96.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Lukáš Novák (2014). Můžeme Mluvit o Tom, Co Není? Studia Neoaristotelica 11 (3):36-72.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Dan Török (2014). Spor o Svobodnou Vůli Mezi Erasmem Rotterdamským a Martinem Lutherem. Studia Neoaristotelica 11 (3):5-35.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John A. Demetracopoulos (2014). Purchotius Græcus II: Vikentios Damodos’ Concise Metaphysics, Part I And II. Studia Neoaristotelica 11 (1):5-63.
    Vikentios Damodos was a private teacher of philosophy and theology in Cephalonia , Ionian Islands , when they were under Venetian rule. He had studied in Venice and Padua and elaborated a Greek Concise Metaphysics, which forms a part of his hefty Philosophy. Concise Metaphysics is a selective translation or adaptation of passages from the respective parts of Institutiones philosophicæ by Edmond Pourchot, a Scholastico-Cartesian professor of philosophy ; namely from Metaphysics of Vol. I ; as well as from the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Ulrich G. Leinsle (2014). Physica Sacra. Wunder, Naturwissenschaft und historischer Schriftsinn zwischen Mittelalter und Früher Neuzeit by Bernd Roling. [REVIEW] Studia Neoaristotelica 11 (1):151-154.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jan Palkoska (2014). Inesse and Concipi in Spinoza’s Ethics. Studia Neoaristotelica 11 (1):64-88.
    In this paper I examine the prospects of the two major approaches to interpreting the ‘inesse’ relation in Spinoza’s definitions of substance and mode in the Ethics – the ‘inherence’ interpretation and the ‘causal’ interpretation. I argue that these interpretations will find it difficult to reconcile the claim that modes ‘are in’ substance with the claim that modes are conceived through substance. I consider a number of strategies that proponents of these readings might use to overcome the problem, and conclude (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. John Peterson (2014). Creation and Consciousness. Studia Neoaristotelica 11 (1):135-149.
    Defenders of the evolutionary origin of human beings hold that humankind has in its entirety evolved out of lower life forms. This opposes the idea of creation under which at least one aspect of human beings has not evolved out of pre-existing material things or states of thing but has been produced out of nothing by God. It is here argued that creation is correct. For whatever might be said of other aspects or elements in our natures, our consciousness, taken (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Vlastimil Vohánka (2014). Are Standard Lawlike Propositions Metaphysically Necessary? Hildebrand Vs. Groarke. Studia Neoaristotelica 11 (1):89-133.
    I discuss Dietrich von Hildebrand, a realist phenomenologist, and Louis Groarke, an Aristotelian. They are close in epistemology and modal metaphysics, but divided about the metaphysical necessity of standard lawlike propositions – i.e., standard natural laws and standard truths about natural kinds. I extract and undermine the reasons of both authors. Hildebrand claims that no standard lawlike proposition is metaphysically necessary, since none is in principle knowable solely by considering essences. I undermine this when I argue that the explanation of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues