Year:

Forthcoming articles
  1.  35 DLs
    Brian D. Earp, Anders Sandberg & Julian Savulescu (forthcoming). The Medicalization of Love. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics:1-19.
    Pharmaceuticals or other emerging technologies could be used to enhance (or diminish) feelings of lust, attraction, and attachment in adult romantic partnerships. While such interventions could conceivably be used to promote individual (and couple) well-being, their widespread development and/or adoption might lead to “medicalization” of human love and heartache—for some, a source of serious concern. In this essay, we argue that the “medicalization of love” need not necessarily be problematic, on balance, but could plausibly be expected to have either good (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2.  0 DLs
    Allison Merrick, Rochelle Green, Thomas Cunningham, Leah Eisenberg & D. Micah Hester (forthcoming). Introducing the Medical Ethics Bowl. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.
    Although ethics is an essential component of undergraduate medical education, research suggests current medical ethics curricula face considerable challenges in improving students’ ethical reasoning. This paper discusses these challenges and introduces a promising new mode of graduate and professional ethics instruction for overcoming them. We begin by describing common ethics curricula, focusing in particular on established problems with current approaches. Next, we describe a novel method of ethics education and assessment for medical students that we have devised, the Medical Ethics (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3.  1 DLs
    Sven Nyholm (forthcoming). The "Medicalization" of Love and Narrow and Broad Conceptions of Human Well-Being. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.
    Would a “medicalization” of love be a “good” or “bad” form of medicalization? In discussing this question, Earp, Sandberg, and Savulescu primarily focus on the potential positive and negative consequences of turning love into a medical issue. But it can also be asked whether there is something intrinsically regrettable about medicalizing love. It is argued here that the medicalization of love can be seen as an “evaluative category mistake”: it treats a core human value as if it were mainly a (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4.  0 DLs
    G. J. Agich (forthcoming). Why Quality is so Rarely Addressed in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5.  0 DLs
    Marysa Demoor (forthcoming). Not with a Bang but a Whimper: The Great Victorians' Exit From a Modernist World, as Reflected in Lucy Clifford's Correspondence, 1919-1929. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6.  0 DLs
    A. Klotzko (forthcoming). Cloning Issue. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7.  0 DLs
    L. J. M. Stark (forthcoming). Reading Trust Between the Lines: An Ethnography of 'Housekeeping Work'on Human-Subjects Review Boards. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues