68 found

Year:

Forthcoming articles
  1.  13
    Robert Barnard & Joseph Ulatowski (forthcoming). Tarski’s 1944 Polemical Remarks and Naess’ “Experimental Philosophy". Erkenntnis:1-21.
    Many of Tarski’s better known papers are either about or include lengthy discussions of how to properly define various concepts: truth, logical consequence, semantic concepts, or definability. In general, these papers identify two primary conditions for successful definitions: formal correctness and material adequacy. Material adequacy requires that the concept expressed by the formal definition capture the intuitive content of truth. Our primary interest in this paper is to better understand Tarski’s thinking about material adequacy, and whether components of his view (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  34
    Reid Blackman (forthcoming). Why Compatibilists Need Alternative Possibilities. Erkenntnis:1-16.
    Defenders of compatibilism occupy one of two camps: those who think that free will requires the ability to do otherwise, and those who deny this. Those compatibilists who think that free will requires the ability to do otherwise are interested in defending a reading of ‘can’ such that one can do otherwise even if determinism is true. By contrast, those compatibilists who think that free will does not require the ability to do otherwise tend to join incompatibilists in denying that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  93
    Andrew Brenner (forthcoming). What Do We Mean When We Ask “Why is There Something Rather Than Nothing?". Erkenntnis:1-18.
    Let’s call the sentence “why is there something rather than nothing?” the Question. There’s no consensus, of course, regarding which proposed answer to the Question, if any, is correct, but occasionally there’s also controversy regarding the meaning of the Question itself. In this paper I argue that such controversy persists because there just isn’t one unique interpretation of the Question. Rather, the puzzlement expressed by the sentence “why is there something rather than nothing?” varies depending on the ontology implicitly or (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  11
    Joshua D. K. Brown & James W. Garson (forthcoming). A New Semantics for Vagueness. Erkenntnis:1-21.
    Intuitively, vagueness involves some sort of indeterminacy: if Plato is a borderline case of baldness, then there is no fact of the matter about whether or not he’s bald—he’s neither bald nor not bald. The leading formal treatments of such indeterminacy—three valued logic, supervaluationism, etc.—either fail to validate the classical theorems, or require that various classically valid inference rules be restricted. Here we show how a fully classical, yet indeterminist account of vagueness can be given within natural semantics, an alternative (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  43
    Georg Brun (forthcoming). Explication as a Method of Conceptual Re-Engineering. Erkenntnis:1-31.
    Taking Carnap’s classic exposition as a starting point, this paper develops a pragmatic account of the method of explication, defends it against a range of challenges and proposes a detailed recipe for the practice of explicating. It is then argued that confusions are involved in characterizing explications as definitions, and in advocating precising definitions as an alternative to explications. Explication is better characterized as conceptual re-engineering for theoretical purposes, in contrast to conceptual re-engineering for other purposes and improving exactness for (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  22
    Yishai Cohen (forthcoming). Fischer's Deterministic Frankfurt-Style Argument. Erkenntnis:1-20.
    According to the Dilemma Defense, it is question-begging against the incompatibilist defender of the principle of alternative possibilities (PAP) to assume that the agent in a deterministic Frankfurt-style case (FSC) cannot do otherwise in light of causal determinism, but is nevertheless morally responsible. As a result, Fischer (Philos Rev 119:315–336, 2010; Analysis 73:489–496, 2013) attempts to undermine PAP in a different manner via a deterministic FSC. More specifically, Fischer attempts to show that if causal determinism rules out an agent’s moral (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  46
    Gabriele Contessa (forthcoming). Dispositions and Tricks. Erkenntnis:1-10.
    According to the Simple Conditional Analysis, disposition ascriptions are to be analyzed in terms of counterfactual conditionals. The Simple Conditional Analysis is notoriously vulnerable to counterexamples. In this paper, I introduce a new sort of counterexample to the Simple Conditional Analysis, which I call ‘tricks’. I then explore a number of possible strategies to modify the Simple Conditional Analysis so as to avoid tricks and conclude that, in order to avoid tricks, the associated counterfactual should be evaluated at the closest (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  14
    Matthew Frise (forthcoming). Internalism and the Problem of Stored Beliefs. Erkenntnis.
    A belief is stored if it is in no way before the subject’s mind. The problem of stored beliefs is that of satisfactorily explaining how the stored beliefs which seem justified are indeed justified. In this paper I challenge the two leading internalist attempts to solve this problem. Internalism about epistemic justification, at a minimum, states that one’s mental life alone determines what one is justified in believing. First I dispute the attempt from epistemic conservatism, which states that believing justifies (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  22
    Roberto Fumagalli (forthcoming). Why We Cannot Learn From Minimal Models. Erkenntnis:1-23.
    Philosophers of science have developed several accounts of how consideration of scientific models can prompt learning about real-world targets. In recent years, various authors advocated the thesis that consideration of so-called minimal models can prompt learning about such targets. In this paper, I draw on the philosophical literature on scientific modelling and on widely cited illustrations from economics and biology to argue that this thesis fails to withstand scrutiny. More specifically, I criticize leading proponents of such thesis for failing to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  25
    Philip Goff (forthcoming). Fundamentality and the Mind-Body Problem. Erkenntnis:1-18.
    In the recent metaphysics literature, a number of philosophers have independently endeavoured to marry sparse ontology to abundant truth. The aim is to keep ontological commitments minimal, whilst allowing true sentences to quantify over a vastly greater range of entities than those which they are ontologically committed to. For example, an ontological commitment only to concrete, microscopic simples might be conjoined with a commitment to truths such as ‘There are twenty people working in this building’ and ‘There are prime numbers (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  25
    Remco Heesen & Pieter van der Kolk (forthcoming). A Game-Theoretic Approach to Peer Disagreement. Erkenntnis:1-24.
    In this paper we propose and analyze a game-theoretic model of the epistemology of peer disagreement. In this model, the peers’ rationality is evaluated in terms of their probability of ending the disagreement with a true belief. We find that different strategies—in particular, one based on the Steadfast View and one based on the Conciliatory View—are rational depending on the truth-sensitivity of the individuals involved in the disagreement. Interestingly, the Steadfast and the Conciliatory Views can even be rational simultaneously in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  19
    Scott Hill (forthcoming). From Isolation to Skepticism. Erkenntnis:1-20.
    If moral properties lacked causal powers, would moral skepticism be true? I argue that it would. Along the way I respond to various arguments that it would not.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  14
    Terence Horgan (forthcoming). Generalized Conditionalization and the Sleeping Beauty Problem, II. Erkenntnis.
    In “Generalized Conditionalization and the Sleeping Beauty Problem,” Anna Mahtani and I offer a new argument for thirdism that relies on what we call “generalized conditionalization.” Generalized conditionalization goes beyond conventional conditionalization in two respects: first, by sometimes deploying a space of synchronic, essentially temporal, candidate-possibilities that are not “prior” possibilities; and second, by allowing for the use of preliminary probabilities that arise by first bracketing, and then conditionalizing upon, “old evidence.” In “Beauty and Conditionalization: Reply to Horgan and Mahtani,” (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  14.  18
    David Ingram (forthcoming). Platonism, Alienation, and Negativity. Erkenntnis:1-13.
    A platonic theory of possibility states that truths about what’s possible are determined by facts about properties not being instantiated. Recently, Matthew Tugby has argued in favour of this sort of theory, arguing that adopting a platonic theory of possibility allows us to solve a paradox concerning alien properties: properties that might have been instantiated, but aren’t actually. In this paper, I raise a worry for Tugby’s proposal—that it commits us to negative facts playing an important truth-making role—and offer a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  29
    Lina Jansson (forthcoming). Explanatory Asymmetries, Ground, and Ontological Dependence. Erkenntnis:1-28.
    The notions of ground and ontological dependence have made a prominent resurgence in much of contemporary metaphysics. However, objections have been raised. On the one hand, objections have been raised to the need for distinctively metaphysical notions of ground and ontological dependence. On the other, objections have been raised to the usefulness of adding ground and ontological dependence to the existing store of other metaphysical notions. Even the logical properties of ground and ontological dependence are under debate. In this article, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  9
    Alex Kaiserman (forthcoming). Necessary Connections in Context. Erkenntnis:1-20.
    This paper combines the ancient idea that causes necessitate their effects with Angelika Kratzer’s semantics of modality. On the resulting view, causal claims quantify over restricted domains of possible worlds determined by two contextually determined parameters. I argue that this view can explain a number of otherwise puzzling features of the way we use and evaluate causal language, including the difference between causing an effect and being a cause of it, the sensitivity of causal judgements to normative facts, and the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  18
    Jeff Kasser (forthcoming). Two Conceptions of Weight of Evidence in Peirce’s Illustrations of the Logic of Science. Erkenntnis:1-20.
    Weight of evidence continues to be a powerful metaphor within formal approaches to epistemology. But attempts to construe the metaphor in precise and useful ways have encountered formidable obstacles. This paper shows that two quite different understandings of evidential weight can be traced back to one 1878 article by C.S. Peirce. One conception, often associated with I.J. Good, measures the balance or net weight of evidence, while the other, generally associated with J.M. Keynes, measures the gross weight of evidence. Conflations (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  30
    Shieva Kleinschmidt (forthcoming). At It Again: Time-Travel and Motion. Erkenntnis:1-14.
    The At-At Account of motion is the extremely popular view that, necessarily, something moves if and only if it’s at one place at one time, and at a distinct place at a distinct time. This, many believe, is all that motion consists in. However, I will present a case in which, intuitively, motion does not occur, though the At-At Account of motion entails that it does. I will then turn to the only tenable response that avoids revising the At-At Account: (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  8
    Ansten Klev (forthcoming). Identity and Sortals. Erkenntnis:1-16.
    According to the sortal conception of the universe of individuals every individual falls under a highest sortal, or category. It is argued here that on this conception the identity relation is defined between individuals a and b if and only if a and b fall under a common category. Identity must therefore be regarded as a relation of the form \, with three arguments x, y, and Z, where Z ranges over categories, and where the range of x and y (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  10
    Teresa Kouri (forthcoming). Restall’s Proof-Theoretic Pluralism and Relevance Logic. Erkenntnis:1-10.
    Restall :279–291, 2014) proposes a new, proof-theoretic, logical pluralism. This is in contrast to the model-theoretic pluralism he and Beall proposed in Beall and Restall :475–493, 2000) and in Beall and Restall. What I will show is that Restall has not described the conditions on being admissible to the proof-theoretic logical pluralism in such a way that relevance logic is one of the admissible logics. Though relevance logic is not hard to add formally, one critical component of Restall’s pluralism is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  30
    David Ludwig (forthcoming). Ontological Choices and the Value-Free Ideal. Erkenntnis:1-20.
    The aim of this article is to argue that ontological choices in scientific practice undermine common formulations of the value-free ideal in science. First, I argue that the truth values of scientific statements depend on ontological choices. For example, statements about entities such as species, race, memory, intelligence, depression, or obesity are true or false relative to the choice of a biological, psychological, or medical ontology. Second, I show that ontological choices often depend on non-epistemic values. On the basis of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  19
    Kevin Morris (forthcoming). The Combination Problem: Subjects and Unity. Erkenntnis:1-18.
    Panpsychism has often been motivated on the grounds that any attempt to account for experience and consciousness in organisms in purely physical, nonexperiential terms faces severe difficulties. The “combination problem” charges that attributing phenomenal properties to the basic constituents of organisms, as panpsychism proposes, likewise fails to provide a satisfactory basis for experience in humans and other organisms. This paper evaluates a recent attempt to understand, and solve, the combination problem. This approach, due to Sam Coleman, is premised (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  29
    Martin Pickup (forthcoming). A Situationalist Solution to the Ship of Theseus Puzzle. Erkenntnis:1-20.
    This paper outlines a novel solution to the Ship of Theseus puzzle. The solution relies on situations, a philosophical tool used in natural language semantics among other places. The core idea is that what is true is always relative to the situation under consideration. I begin by outlining the problem before briefly introducing situations. I then present the solution: in smaller situations the candidate is identical to Theseus’s ship. But in larger situations containing both candidates these identities are neither true (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  7
    Guy Politzer (forthcoming). Deductive Reasoning Under Uncertainty: A Water Tank Analogy. Erkenntnis:1-28.
    This paper describes a cubic water tank equipped with a movable partition receiving various amounts of liquid used to represent joint probability distributions. This device is applied to the investigation of deductive inferences under uncertainty. The analogy is exploited to determine by qualitative reasoning the limits in probability of the conclusion of twenty basic deductive arguments often used as benchmark problems by the various theoretical approaches to reasoning under uncertainty. The probability bounds imposed by the premises on the conclusion are (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  1
    Erich Rast (forthcoming). Modeling Value Disagreement. Erkenntnis:1-28.
    In this article, monist values are expressed as preferences like in economics and decision making. On the basis of this formalization, various ways of defining value disagreement of agents within a group are investigated. Twelve notions of categorical value disagreement are laid out. Since these are too coarse-grained for many purposes, known distance-based approaches like Kendall’s Tau and Spearman’s footrule are generalized from linear orders to preorders and position-sensitive variants are developed. The account is further generalized to allow for agents (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  35
    Michael Roche (forthcoming). Physicalism and Supervenience: A Case for a New Sense of Physical Duplication. Erkenntnis:1-13.
    Physicalism is the view, roughly, that everything is physical. This thesis is often characterized in terms of a particular supervenience thesis. Central to this thesis is the idea of physical duplication. I argue that the standard way of understanding physical duplication leads—along with other claims—to a sub-optimal consequence for the physicalist. I block this consequence by shifting to an alternative sense of physical duplication. I then argue that physicalism is best characterized by a supervenience thesis that employs both the new (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  50
    Jan Westerhoff (forthcoming). What It Means to Live in a Virtual World Generated by Our Brain. Erkenntnis:1-22.
    Recent discussions in cognitive science and the philosophy of mind have defended a theory according to which we live in a virtual world akin to a computer simulation, generated by our brain. It is argued that our brain creates a model world from a variety of stimuli; this model is perceived as if it was external and perception-independent, even though it is neither of the two. The view of the mind, brain, and world, entailed by this theory has some (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  4
    Simon Langford (forthcoming). 3D Cohabitation. Erkenntnis:1-16.
    The cohabitation theory is a popular solution to the problem of personal fission. It affirms that all the people who result from fission were there cohabiting the pre-fission body all along. Adopting this solution is an uncontroversial move for four-dimensionalists, but is it open to three-dimensionalists too? Some have thought so, but Katherine Hawley, Mark Johnston, and Eric Olson have argued to the contrary. They claim three-dimensionalists simply cannot be cohabitation theorists. In this paper, I explain how they can.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  93
    B. J. C. Madison (forthcoming). Internalism in the Epistemology of Testimony Redux. Erkenntnis:1-15.
    In general, epistemic internalists hold that an individual’s justification for a belief is exhausted by her reflectively accessible reasons for thinking that the contents of her beliefs are true. Applying this to the epistemology of testimony, a hearer’s justification for beliefs acquired through testimony is exhausted by her reflectively accessible reasons to think that the contents of the speaker’s testimony is true. A consequence of internalism is that subjects that are alike with respect to their reflectively accessible reasons are alike (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  13
    Anthony F. Peressini (forthcoming). Imprecise Probability and Chance. Erkenntnis:1-26.
    Understanding probabilities as something other than point values has often been motivated by the need to find more realistic models for degree of belief, and in particular the idea that degree of belief should have an objective basis in “statistical knowledge of the world.” I offer here another motivation growing out of efforts to understand how chance evolves as a function of time. If the world is “chancy” in that there are non-trivial, objective, physical probabilities at the macro-level, then the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  10
    Peter Shiu-Hwa Tsu (forthcoming). Can the Canberrans’ Supervenience Argument Refute Shapeless Moral Particularism? Erkenntnis:1-16.
    Frank Jackson, Michael Smith, and Philip Pettit contend in their 2000 paper that an argument from supervenience deals a fatal blow to shapeless moral particularism, the view that the moral is shapeless with respect to the natural. A decade has passed since the Canberrans advanced their highly influential supervenience argument. Yet, there has not been any compelling counter-argument against it, as far as I can see. My aim in this paper is to fill in this void and defend SMP against (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  11
    Valtteri Arstila (forthcoming). Perceptual Learning Explains Two Candidates for Cognitive Penetration. Erkenntnis:1-22.
    The cognitive penetrability of perceptual experiences has been a long-standing topic of disagreement among philosophers and psychologists. Although the notion of cognitive penetrability itself has also been under dispute, the debate has mainly focused on the cases in which cognitive states allegedly penetrate perceptual experiences. This paper concerns the plausibility of two prominent cases. The first one originates from Susanna Siegel’s claim that perceptual experiences can represent natural kind properties. If this is true, then the concepts we possess change the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  38
    Jeffrey A. Barrett (forthcoming). On the Evolution of Truth. Erkenntnis:1-10.
    This paper is concerned with how a simple metalanguage might coevolve with a simple descriptive base language in the context of interacting Skyrms–Lewis signaling games Lewis. We will first consider a metagame that evolves to track the successful and unsuccessful use of a coevolving base language, then we will consider a metagame that evolves a truth predicate for expressions in a coevolving base language. We will see how a metagame that tracks truth provides an endogenous way to break the symmetry (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  16
    Denis Bonnay & Dag Westerståhl (forthcoming). Compositionality Solves Carnap’s Problem. Erkenntnis:1-19.
    The standard relation of logical consequence allows for non-standard interpretations of logical constants, as was shown early on by Carnap. But then how can we learn the interpretations of logical constants, if not from the rules which govern their use? Answers in the literature have mostly consisted in devising clever rule formats going beyond the familiar what follows from what. A more conservative answer is possible. We may be able to learn the correct interpretations from the standard rules, because the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  2
    Seamus Bradley (forthcoming). Nonclassical Probability and Convex Hulls. Erkenntnis:1-15.
    It is well known that the convex hull of the classical truth value functions contains all and only the probability functions. Work by Paris and Williams has shown that this also holds for various kinds of nonclassical logics too. This note summarises the formal details of this topic and extends the results slightly.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  12
    Claudio Calosi & Matteo Morganti (forthcoming). Humean Supervenience, Composition as Identity and Quantum Wholes. Erkenntnis:1-22.
    In this paper, we focus on two related reductive theses in metaphysics—Humean Supervenience and Composition as Identity —and on their status in light of the indications coming from science, in particular quantum mechanics. While defenders of these reductive theses claim that they can be updated so as to resist the quantum evidence, we provide arguments against this contention. We claim that physics gives us reason for thinking that both Humean Supervenience and Composition as Identity are at least contingently false, as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  5
    Gustavo Cevolani (forthcoming). Fallibilism, Verisimilitude, and the Preface Paradox. Erkenntnis:1-15.
    The Preface Paradox apparently shows that it is sometimes rational to believe logically incompatible propositions. In this paper, I propose a way out of the paradox based on the ideas of fallibilism and verisimilitude. More precisely, I defend the view that a rational inquirer can fallibly believe or accept a proposition which is false, or likely false, but verisimilar; and I argue that this view makes the Preface Paradox disappear. Some possible objections to my proposal, and an alternative view of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  2
    Sungho Choi (forthcoming). Intrinsic Interferers and the Epistemology of Dispositions. Erkenntnis:1-34.
    It is held by some philosophers that it is possible that x has a disposition D but, if the stimulus condition obtains, it won’t manifest D because of an intrinsic interference. I will criticize this position on the ground that it has a deeply sceptical consequence, for instance, that, assuming that I am not well informed of the micro-properties of a metal coin, I do not know that it is not water-soluble. But I urge that this is beyond the pale, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  6
    Adrian Mitchell Currie (forthcoming). The Mystery of the Triceratops’s Mother: How to Be a Realist About the Species Category. Erkenntnis:1-22.
    Can we be realists about a general category but pluralists about concepts relating to that category? I argue that paleobiological methods of delineating species are not affected by differing species concepts, and that this underwrites an argument that species concept pluralists should be species category realists. First, the criteria by which paleobiologists delineate species are ‘indifferent’ to the species category. That is, their method for identifying species applies equally to any species concept. To identify a new species, paleobiologists show that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. J. Earman, C. Glymour & S. Mitchell (forthcoming). Special Issue Of. Erkenntnis.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  37
    John Eriksson (forthcoming). Expressivism, Attitudinal Complexity and Two Senses of Disagreement in Attitude. Erkenntnis:1-20.
    It has recently become popular to apply expressivism outside the moral domain, e.g., to truth and epistemic justification. This paper examines the prospects of generalizing expressivism to taste. This application has much initial plausibility. Many of the standard arguments used in favor of moral expressivism seem to apply to taste. For example, it seems conceivable that you and I disagree about whether chocolate is delicious although we don’t disagree about the facts, which suggests that taste judgments are noncognitive attitudes rather (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  12
    Benjamin Ferguson (forthcoming). The Paradox of Exploitation. Erkenntnis:1-22.
    The concept of exploitation brings many of our ordinary moral intuitions into conflict. Exploitation—or to use the commonly accepted ordinary language definition, taking unfair advantage—is often thought to be morally impermissible. In order to be permissible, transactions must not be unfair. The claim that engaging in mutually beneficial transactions is morally better than not transacting is also quite compelling. However, when combined with the claim that morally permissible transactions are better than impermissible transactions, these three imply the counterintuitive claim that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  14
    Rohan French (forthcoming). An Argument for the Ontological Innocence of Mereology. Erkenntnis:1-22.
    In Parts of Classes David Lewis argued that mereology is ‘ontologically innocent’, mereological notions not incurring additional ontological commitments. Unfortunately, though, Lewis’s argument for this is not fully spelled out. Here we use some formal results concerning translations between formal languages to argue for the ontological innocence of mereology directly.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  3
    Dr Alessandro Giordani (forthcoming). On a New Tentative Solution to Fitch’s Paradox. Erkenntnis:1-15.
    In a recent paper, Alexander argues that relaxing the requirement that sound knowers know their own soundness might provide a solution to Fitch’s paradox and introduces a suitable axiomatic system where the paradox is avoided. In this paper an analysis of this solution is proposed according to which the effective move for solving the paradox depends on the axiomatic treatment of the ontic modality rather than the limitations imposed on the epistemic one. It is then shown that, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  7
    Casper Storm Hansen (forthcoming). Unified Grounding. Erkenntnis:1-18.
    This paper offers a unification and systematization of the grounding approaches to truth, denotation, classes and abstraction. Its main innovation is a method for “kleenifying” bivalent semantics so as to ensure that the trivalent semantics used for various linguistic elements are perfectly analogous to the semantics used by Kripke, rather than relying on intuition to achieve similarity. The focus is on generalizing strong Kleene semantics, but one section is devoted to supervaluation, and the unification method also extends to weak Kleene (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  28
    Chaoan He (forthcoming). Conjunction, Connection and Counterfactuals. Erkenntnis:1-15.
    The standard Lewis–Stalnaker semantics of counterfactuals, given the Strong Centering Thesis, implies that all true–true counterfactuals are trivially true. McGlynn developed a theory, based on Penczek, to rehabilitate the non-triviality of true–true counterfactuals. I show here that counterfactuals with true but irrelevant components are counterexamples to McGlynn’s account. I argue that an extended version of the connection hypothesis is sustainable, and grounds a full theory of counterfactuals explicable in a broadly standard way, if an indispensable asymmetry between semifacuals and other (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Sune Holm (forthcoming). The Problem of Phantom Functions. Erkenntnis:1-9.
    This paper discusses a recent solution to the problem of artifact phantom functions by Beth Preston. A phantom function is a function associated with a kind of artifact that it is structurally incapable of performing. Preston proposes a criterion of artifact proper function according to which phantom functions can be proper functions. This paper argues that Preston’s criterion cannot ground the teleological and normative aspects definitive of proper functions and that the proposed criterion is not consistent with (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  2
    Jürgen Landes & George Masterton (forthcoming). Invariant Equivocation. Erkenntnis:1-27.
    Objective Bayesians hold that degrees of belief ought to be chosen in the set of probability functions calibrated with one’s evidence. The particular choice of degrees of belief is via some objective, i.e., not agent-dependent, inference process that, in general, selects the most equivocal probabilities from among those compatible with one’s evidence. Maximising entropy is what drives these inference processes in recent works by Williamson and Masterton though they disagree as to what should have its entropy maximised. With regard to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Dordrecht Boston London (forthcoming). An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy. Erkenntnis.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  5
    Federico Luzzi (forthcoming). Is Testimonial Knowledge Second-Hand Knowledge? Erkenntnis:1-20.
    Fricker has proposed that a hearer’s knowledge that p acquired through trusting a speaker requires the speaker to know that p, and that therefore testimonial knowledge through trust is necessarily second-hand knowledge. In this paper, I argue that Fricker’s view is problematic for four reasons: firstly, Fricker’s dismissal of a central challenge to the second-handedness of testimonial knowledge is based on a significant misrepresentation of this challenge; secondly, on closer scrutiny an important distinction Fricker wants to draw is compromised by (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  51.  12
    Raamy Majeed (forthcoming). Conceptual Instability and the New Epistemic Possibility. Erkenntnis:1-15.
    We tend to think that our concepts are stable in the sense that, whilst their extensions may vary across distinct epistemic scenarios, the reference-fixing conditions by which we discover these extensions remain fixed. This paper challenges this orthodoxy. In particular, it aims to motivate the position that some concepts are unstable in that their reference-fixing conditions themselves vary across distinct epistemic scenarios. Furthermore, it aims to draw out the implications such instability has for epistemic possibility and apriority. I shall argue (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  52.  28
    John Byron Manchak (forthcoming). Is the Universe As Large As It Can Be? Erkenntnis:1-4.
    In this note, we cast doubt on the requirement of spacetime inextendibility; it is not at all clear that our universe is “as large as it can be.”.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  53.  2
    David Matheson (forthcoming). Testimonial Reasons. Erkenntnis:1-18.
    In this paper I consider whether the reasons on which our testimonial beliefs are directly based—“testimonial reasons”—are basic reasons for belief. After laying out a Dretske-inspired psychologistic conception of reasons for belief in general and a corresponding conception of basic reasons for belief, I present a prima facie case against the basicality of testimonial reasons. I then respond to a challenge from Audi to this case. To the extent that my response is successful, the viability of an important kind of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  54. Felix Meiner (forthcoming). International Journal of Analytic Philosophy. Erkenntnis.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  55.  15
    Tuomas K. Pernu (forthcoming). Causal Exclusion and Downward Counterfactuals. Erkenntnis:1-19.
    One of the main line of responses to the infamous causal exclusion problem has been based on the counterfactual account of causation. However, arguments have begun to surface to the effect that the counterfactual theory is in fact ill-equipped to solve the exclusion problem due to its commitment to downward causation. This argumentation is here critically analysed. An analysis of counterfactual dependence is presented and it is shown that if the semantics of counterfactuals is taken into account (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  56.  11
    Huiming Ren (forthcoming). Inverted Earth Revisited. Erkenntnis:1-15.
    By considering another version of the Inverted Earth thought experiment in which the protagonist is informed that she is implanted with inverting lenses behind her eyes, I argue that the thought experiment doesn’t successfully pose a challenge to representationalism because after many years, the protagonist’s visual experience of the sky of Inverted Earth would simply represent it as blue.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  57.  1
    Davide Rizza (forthcoming). Divergent Mathematical Treatments in Utility Theory. Erkenntnis:1-17.
    In this paper I study how divergent mathematical treatments affect mathematical modelling, with a special focus on utility theory. In particular I examine recent work on the ranking of information states and the discounting of future utilities, in order to show how, by replacing the standard analytical treatment of the models involved with one based on the framework of Nonstandard Analysis, diametrically opposite results are obtained. In both cases, the choice between the standard and nonstandard treatment amounts to a selection (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  58.  8
    Bryan W. Roberts (forthcoming). Curie’s Hazard: From Electromagnetism to Symmetry Violation. Erkenntnis:1-19.
    Pierre Curie claimed that a symmetry of a cause must be found in the produced effects. This paper shows why this principle works in Curie’s example of the electrostatics of central fields, but fails in many others. The failure of Curie’s claim is then shown to be of special empirical interest, in that this failure underpins the experimental discovery of parity violation and of CP violation in the twentieth century.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  59.  12
    Michael Robinson (forthcoming). Truthmakers, Moral Responsibility, and an Alleged Counterexample to Rule A. Erkenntnis:1-7.
    Charles Hermes argues that the Direct Argument for the incompatibility of determinism and moral responsibility fails because one of the inference rules on which it relies, Rule A, is invalid. Rule A states that if a proposition p is broadly logically necessary, then p is true and no one is, or ever has been, even partly morally responsible for the fact that p. Hermes purports to offer a counterexample to Rule A which focuses on agents’ moral responsibility for disjunctions. Hermes’s (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  60.  26
    Yasha Rohwer & Collin Rice (forthcoming). How Are Models and Explanations Related? Erkenntnis:1-22.
    Within the modeling literature, there is often an implicit assumption about the relationship between a given model and a scientific explanation. The goal of this article is to provide a unified framework with which to analyze the myriad relationships between a model and an explanation. Our framework distinguishes two fundamental kinds of relationships. The first is metaphysical, where the model is identified as an explanation or as a partial explanation. The second is epistemological, where the model produces understanding that is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  61.  7
    Michael Schippers (forthcoming). The Problem of Coherence and Truth Redux. Erkenntnis:1-35.
    In “What price coherence?”, Klein and Warfield put forward a simple argument that triggered an extensive debate on the epistemic virtues of coherence. As is well-known, this debate yielded far-reaching impossibility results to the effect that coherence is not conducive to truth, even if construed in a ceteris paribus sense. A large part of the present paper is devoted to a re-evaluation of these results. As is argued, all explications of truth-conduciveness leave out an important aspect: while it might not (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  62.  18
    Benjamin Sheredos (forthcoming). Re-Reconciling the Epistemic and Ontic Views of Explanation. Erkenntnis:1-31.
    Recent attempts to reconcile the ontic and epistemic approaches to explanation propose that our best explanations simply fulfill epistemic and ontic norms simultaneously. I aim to upset this armistice. Epistemic norms of attaining general and systematic explanations are, I argue, autonomous of ontic norms: they cannot be fulfilled simultaneously or in simple conjunction with ontic norms, and plausibly have priority over them. One result is that central arguments put forth by ontic theorists against epistemic theorists are revealed as not only (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  63. N. Strobach (forthcoming). Review of Wölfl (1999), Forthcoming In. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  64. Dieter Teichert (forthcoming). Erfahrung, Erinnerung. Erkenntnis.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  65.  9
    Dingmar van Eck & Julie Mennes (forthcoming). Design Explanation and Idealization. Erkenntnis:1-21.
    In this paper we assess the explanatory role of idealizations in ‘design explanations’, a type of functional explanation used in biology. In design explanations, idealizations highlight which factors make a difference to phenomena to be explained: hypothetical, idealized, organisms are invoked to make salient which traits of extant organisms make a difference to organismal fitness. This result negates the view that idealizations serve only pragmatic benefits, and complements the view that idealizations highlight factors that do not make a difference. This (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  66. Felix Meiner Verlag (forthcoming). An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy. Erkenntnis.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  67.  20
    James Owen Weatherall (forthcoming). Are Newtonian Gravitation and Geometrized Newtonian Gravitation Theoretically Equivalent? Erkenntnis:1-19.
    I argue that a criterion of theoretical equivalence due to Glymour :227–251, 1977) does not capture an important sense in which two theories may be equivalent. I then motivate and state an alternative criterion that does capture the sense of equivalence I have in mind. The principal claim of the paper is that relative to this second criterion, the answer to the question posed in the title is “yes”, at least on one natural understanding of Newtonian gravitation.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  68. Lyman C. Wynne (forthcoming). Desintegration und Lebenspraxis. Erkenntnis.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues