Ethics and the Environment

7 found

Year:

Year: 2013, Volume: 18, Issue: 1
  1. Katy Fulfer, The Capabilities Approach to Justice and the Flourishing of Nonsentient Life.
    According to Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach (CA) to justice, a (liberal) society is just if it provides people with the means to actualize basic capabilities that are necessary for a dignified human life. In Frontiers of Justice, Nussbaum (2006) expands the CA to include sentient nonhuman animals in the sphere of justice (as opposed, for instance, to the sphere of compassion). As it does for humans, justice requires that sentient creatures have the ability to access capabilities necessary for their flourishing, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John Hadley, Liberty and Valuing Sentient Life.
    In “Do Animals have an Interest in Liberty?” Alasdair Cochrane brings some much needed attention to the ethics of animal confinement (2009a). Of particular significance is the question of whether confinement in itself is bad for nonhuman animal (hereafter, animal) well-being. If confinement conditions cause animals to suffer or frustrate their preferences it is safe to assume that liberty or freedom (following Cochrane, I use the terms interchangeably) would be instrumentally good for them. But, what about seemingly benign conditions of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Myra J. Hird, Waste, Landfills, and an Environmental Ethic of Vulnerability.
    Canada is the world’s highest per capita municipal solid waste producer. By 2000, Canadians produced more annual waste per person than Americans; and by 2005, Canada produced nearly twice as much garbage as Japan (Conference Board of Canada 2008). By 2006, Canadians produced over 1000 kg of waste per person; 35 million tons of waste in a single calendar year (Statistics Canada 2008). The bulk of this waste ended up in landfills (ibid). In 2010, thirty percent of existing Canadian landfills (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Gal Kober, For They Do Not Agree In Nature: Spinoza and Deep Ecology.
    In the Ethics,1 Spinoza presents a rigorous naturalistic view of man and nature. Man is a part of nature, a subject of the same domain—not a domain separate from it, nor a domain within that of nature. Man cannot act against nature or in an unnatural way; in comparison with any other part or creature of nature, man is not special, more important or qualitatively different. All general laws of nature apply equally to animals, inanimate objects, humans, God, the mind, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Joel Macclellan, How (Not) To Defend A Rawlsian Approach To Intergenerational Ethics.
    Society is a system of cooperation between generations over time. While John Rawls was perhaps the most influential political philosopher of the twentieth century, he dedicated comparatively little space to questions of intergenerational justice. As one sympathetic reader puts it, “despite the small number of pages Rawls devoted to the issue of justice between generations, his account of it has drawn an impressive amount of criticism” (Wissenberg 1999, 175). Nonetheless, Rawls recognized both the importance of intergenerational justice and its challenges, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Kathy Rudy, Ethics and Animals: An Introduction by Lori Gruen (Review).
    I have been teaching an undergraduate course called “Ethics and Animals” for almost a decade now. It counts as a core course for the ethics certificate at my university, and is housed in my home department, Women’s Studies, so there is some presumption of feminist or progressive content. I have the syllabi from all these years laid out in front of me on my desk. What strikes me immediately is that the turnover of the reading list is at least 75 (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Kristin Shrader-Frechette, Answering "Scientific" Attacks on Ethical Imperatives: Wind and Solar Versus Nuclear Solutions to Climate Change.
    Scientists and engineers often are not much interested in theoretical-ethics discussions. Frequently, like Harvard’s Cass Sunstein (2002), they propose “freemarket environmentalism,” basing environmental decisions on cost-benefit analysis and on saving the greatest number of lives for the fewest number of dollars. They say that when society overregulates, by emotively and irrationally rejecting environmental-risk decisions based only on cost-benefit analysis (CBA), it reduces manufacturing jobs, shrinks the economic pie, makes people poorer, and thus causes unnecessary deaths. To avoid these economic problems—that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues