Year:

Forthcoming articles
  1. Mariana Fontes Costdaa (forthcoming). Who Rules the Ruler? On the Misconduct of Journal Editors. Journal of Academic Ethics.
    There are very few (published) accounts of editorial misconduct, and those that do exist are almost exclusively focused on medicine-related areas. In the present article we detail a case of editorial misconduct in a rather underexplored domain, the social sciences. This case demonstrates that although legal systems provide different instruments of protection to avoid, compensate for, and punish misconduct on the part of journal editors, the social and economic power unbalance between authors and publishers suggests the importance of alternative solutions (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jack Corman Francis Rolleston, Paddi O'Hara Serge Gauthier & Rod Schmaltz (forthcoming). Ethics Issues with Private Research Ethics Boards: A Breakout Session at the 2009 Ncehr National Conference. Journal of Academic Ethics.
    Research Ethics Boards (REBs) provide oversight for Canadians that research projects will comply with standards of ethics if the studies are carried out as described in the documents that have been approved. While REBs have traditionally been affiliated with institutions such as universities and hospitals, a number of factors - including the increased volume of research being conducted outside academic centres - have resulted in the establishment of some private or independent REBs. This, in turn, has raised concerns about the (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Tricia Bertram Gallant, Nancy Binkin & Michael Donohue (forthcoming). Students at Risk for Being Reported for Cheating. Journal of Academic Ethics:1-12.
    Student cheating has always been a problem in higher education, but detection of cheating has become easier with technology. As a result, more students are being caught and reported for cheating. While reporting cheating is not a negative, the rippling effects of reported cheating may be felt by some populations more than others. Thus, preventing cheating would be a preferable option for all involved.Identifying those at risk for being reported for cheating is a first step in developing preventive measures. Previous (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Belinda Kenny, Michelle Lincoln & Felicity Killian (forthcoming). Ethics Cases: Do They Elicit Different Levels of Ethical Reasoning? Journal of Academic Ethics:1-17.
  5. Jennifer Tatebe (forthcoming). The Ethics of Difference: Ethical Dilemmas of External Researchers. Journal of Academic Ethics:1-9.
    This paper examines the ethics review process for external researchers. Analysis of some ethical concerns and dilemmas experienced while conducting a multi-site study illustrates the complexities of researching in different contexts. Reflections on identity politics, and ethics review policies and practices expose the tensions between research ethics as a process, and development of ethical thinking and practice. The article concludes by articulating a new vision of ethics reviews for external researchers, which emphasise the need to develop long-term ethical thinking and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues