35 found

Year:

Forthcoming articles
  1. Mark Aakhus (forthcoming). Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds): Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies. Argumentation:1-4.
    Every 4 years, for the past three decades, the world of argumentation research has gathered in Amsterdam at the International Society for the Study of Argumentation conferences to explore advances in understanding argumentation and how argumentation advances our understanding of the human condition. While comprehensive proceedings of selected papers are produced to document what has transpired in the world of argumentation over the preceding 4 years, there remains the important matter of taking the intellectual pulse of the world’s argumentation scholars, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Wilfrid Hodges (forthcoming). Dialogue Protocols for Formal Fallacies: A Reply to Kacprzak and Yaskorska. Argumentation:1-7.
    This note comments on the paper ‘Dialogue protocols for formal fallacies’ by Kacprzak and Yaskorska (this issue). Points discussed include the use of the notions of ‘claiming’, ‘conceding’ and ‘commitment’, and the role of Lorenzen dialogues as a device for checking whether a proposition is a tautology.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Fabio Paglieri (forthcoming). Nothing Persuades Like Success: Reflections on Partially and Over-Successful Persuasion. A Reply to Debowska-Kozlowska. Argumentation:1-8.
    In this brief commentary of Kamila Debowska-Kozlowska’s insightful analysis of persuasive outcomes (Processing topics from the Beneficial Cognitive Model in partially and over-successful persuasion dialogues. Argumentation, 2014), I articulate some suggestions for future development of her ideas. My main claim is that, while instances of partially and over-successful persuasion are indeed worthy of further theoretical inquiry, the topical analysis proposed by Debowska-Kozlowska may benefit from integration with other approaches.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Douglas Walton (forthcoming). Speech Acts and Indirect Threats in Ad Baculum Arguments. A Reply to Budzynska and Witek. Argumentation:1-8.
    The importance of speech acts for analyzing and evaluating argumentation in cases where it is suspected that the ad baculum fallacy has been committed is demonstrated in this paper by using a typical textbook example of this fallacy. It is shown how the argument in the example can be analyzed and evaluated using the devices of Gricean implicature and indirect speech acts. It is shown how these two devices can be applied to extrapolate the evidence furnished by the text and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Vahram Atayan (forthcoming). Generi testuali argomentativi e traduzione in prospettiva storica: qualche osservazione sulla base delle informazioni fornite dalla Saarbrucker Ûbersetzungsbibliographie a proposito delle traduzioni dal francese, dall'italiano e dallo spagnolo in tedesco. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Christina Becker (forthcoming). Dinamizar, impulsar-élargissement, approfondissement: Zum Zusammenhang zwischen konzeptuellen Metaphern und Argumentation am Beispiel politischer Sprachverwendung in Spanien und Frankreich. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Katarzyna Budzynska & Marcin Koszowy (forthcoming). Introduction: Argument Studies in Poland. Argumentation:1-8.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Katarzyna Budzynska & Maciej Witek (forthcoming). Non-Inferential Aspects of Ad Hominem and Ad Baculum. Argumentation:1-15.
    The aim of the paper is to explore the interrelation between persuasion tactics and properties of speech acts. We investigate two types of arguments ad: ad hominem and ad baculum. We show that with both of these tactics, the structures that play a key role are not inferential, but rather ethotic, i.e., related to the speaker’s character and trust. We use the concepts of illocutionary force and constitutive conditions related to the character or status of the speaker in order to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Ana Lûcia Tinoco Cabrai (forthcoming). L'emploi de Portante (Donc) Dans des Textes Écrits En Portugais du Brésil Ana Lûcia Tinoco Cabrai (Sâo Paulo). Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Marion Carel (forthcoming). L'ambivalence argumentative: sous-détermination des énoncés par les phrases. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Michelle Ciurria & Khameiel Altamimi (forthcoming). Argumentum Ad Verecundiam: New Gender-Based Criteria for Appeals to Authority. Argumentation:1-16.
    In his influential work on critical argumentation, Douglas Walton explains how to judge whether an argumentum ad verecundiam (appeal to authority) is fallacious or legitimate. He provides six critical questions and a number of ancillary sub-questions to guide the identification of reasonable appeals to authority. While it is common for informal logicians to acknowledge the role of bias in sampling procedures (which are supposed to select statistically random samples) and hypothesis confirmation (which tends to be self-serving), there is a conspicuous (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Sivan Cohen-Wiesenfeld (forthcoming). Argumentation logique et subjectivité masquée: le cas de la note diplomatique. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Giovanni Damele (forthcoming). Rhetoric and Persuasive Strategies in High Courts' Decisions: Some Remarks on the Recent Decisions of the Portuguese Tribunal Constitutional and the Italian Corte Costituzionale on Same-Sex Marriage. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (forthcoming). Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Rational Disagreement. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Kamila Debowska-Kozlowska (forthcoming). Processing Topics From the Beneficial Cognitive Model in Partially and Over-Successful Persuasion Dialogues. Argumentation:1-15.
    A persuasion dialogue is a dialogue in which a conflict between agents with respect to their points of view arises at the beginning of the talk and the agents have the shared, global goal of resolving the conflict and at least one agent has the persuasive aim to convince the other party to accept an opposing point of view. I argue that the persuasive force of argument may have not only extreme values but also intermediate strength. That is, I wish (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. F. H. Van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser (forthcoming). Argumentation, Interpretation, Rhetoric. Argumentation.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Emily Friedrich (forthcoming). The Toulmin Brief. Argumentation.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Anca Gâjà (forthcoming). La dissociation argumentative: composantes, mise en discours et ajustement stratégique. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Lukáš Hlouch (forthcoming). Models of Legal Reasoning: An Attempt of a Practical View. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Marcin Koszowy & Michał Araszkiewicz (forthcoming). The Lvov–Warsaw School as a Source of Inspiration for Argumentation Theory. Argumentation:1-18.
    The thesis of the paper holds that some future developments of argumentation theory may be inspired by the rich logico-methodological legacy of the Lvov–Warsaw School (LWS), the Polish research movement that was most active from 1895 to 1939. As a selection of ideas of the LWS which exploit both formal and pragmatic aspects of the force of argument, we present: Ajdukiewicz’s account of reasoning and inference, Bocheński’s analyses of superstitions or dogmas, and Frydman’s constructive approach to legal interpretation. This paper (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Martin Kusch & H. Schroder (forthcoming). Text, Interpretation. Argumentation.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Fabrizio Macagno & Benedetta Zavatta (forthcoming). Reconstructing Metaphorical Meaning. Argumentation:1-36.
    Metaphorical meaning can be analyzed as triggered by an apparent communicative breach, an incongruity that leads to a default of the presumptive interpretation of a vehicle. This breach can be solved through contextual renegotiations of meaning guided by the communicative intention, or rather the presumed purpose of the metaphorical utterance. This paper addresses the problem of analyzing the complex process of reasoning underlying the reconstruction of metaphorical meaning. This process will be described as a type of abductive argument, aimed at (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Christian Plantin (forthcoming). Laissez dire: La norme du discours de l'un est dans le discours de l'autre Christian Plantin (Lyon). Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Juho Ritola (forthcoming). Jonathan E. Adler and Lance J. Rips (Eds): Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and Its Foundations. Argumentation:1-8.
    IntroductionThis title is an important collection of articles on the principles, methods, and facts of human reasoning. It is of interest to argumentation theorists, philosophers, psychologists, cognitive scientists, and researchers in related fields. Out of the 53 articles, 16 were written specifically for this volume by prominent representatives of their fields, and it makes an important contribution to the research on reasoning. The size of the collection enables it to include papers from classic philosophical articles to important new theorizing on (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Anika Schiemann (forthcoming). Adverbial indizierte Implikationen: eine argumentationsbasierte Analyse von persinolperfino. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Marcin Selinger (forthcoming). Towards Formal Representation and Evaluation of Arguments. Argumentation:1-15.
    The aim of this paper is to propose foundations for a formal model of representation and numerical evaluation of a possibly broad class of arguments, including those that occur in natural discourse. Since one of the most characteristic features of everyday argumentation is the occurrence of convergent reasoning, special attention should be paid to the operation ⊕, which allows us to calculate the logical force of convergent arguments with an accuracy not offered by other approaches.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Laura Sergo (forthcoming). La funzione argomentativa del connettore infatti in testi scientifici e divulgativi. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Justine Simon (forthcoming). Stratégies de Négociation Politique Et de Représentation du Discours d'Autrui Dans la Presse Adressée aux Jeunes. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Takeshi Suzuki (forthcoming). The 3rd Tokyo Conference on Argumentation. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Paul Van den Hoven (forthcoming). Cognitive Semiotics in Argumentation: A Theoretical Exploration. Argumentation:1-20.
    Argumentation is a cognitive category. Texts cannot be said to be argumentation, nor can argumentation be said to lie in texts. This is an almost trivial semiotic point of departure, but it is quite relevant nevertheless. In this contribution, three reasons are developed to emphasize and to articulate the semiotic component of argumentation to show that it is a crucial element that cannot be disregarded. Two of these reasons are mentioned only in passing as other contributions in this volume deal (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Jan Albert van Laar (forthcoming). Criticism in Need of Clarification. Argumentation:1-23.
    It furthers the dialectic when the opponent is clear about what motivates and underlies her critical stance, even if she does not adopt an opposite standpoint, but merely doubts the proponent’s opinion. Thus, there is some kind of burden of criticism. In some situations, there should an obligation for the opponent to offer explanatory counterconsiderations, if requested, whereas in others, there is no real dialectical obligation, but a mere responsibility for the opponent to cooperate by providing her motivations for being (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Judith Visser (forthcoming). Formation de mots et persuasion: Le discours de l'extrême droite française. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Don Waisanen, Hershey H. Friedman & Linda Weiser Friedman (forthcoming). What's So Funny About Arguing with God? A Case for Playful Argumentation From Jewish Literature. Argumentation:1-24.
    In this paper, we show that God is portrayed in the Hebrew Bible and in the Rabbinic literature—some of the very Hebrew texts that have influenced the three major world religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—as One who can be argued with and even changes his mind. Contrary to fundamentalist positions, in the Hebrew Bible and other Jewish texts God is omniscient but enjoys good, playful argumentation, broadening the possibilities for reasoning and reasonability. Arguing with God has also had a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. John Woods (forthcoming). John Locke. Argumentation.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. A. D. Wright & C. P. Butterfield (forthcoming). The NREL Teetering Hub Rotor Code: Final Results and Conclusions. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues