31 found

Year:

Forthcoming articles
  1. Maarten Boudry, Fabio Paglieri & Massimo Pigliucci (forthcoming). The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life. Argumentation:1-26.
    Philosophers of science have given up on the quest for a silver bullet to put an end to all pseudoscience, as such a neat formal criterion to separate good science from its contenders has proven elusive. In the literature on critical thinking and in some philosophical quarters, however, this search for silver bullets lives on in the taxonomies of fallacies. The attractive idea is to have a handy list of abstract definitions or argumentation schemes, on the basis of which one (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Vahram Atayan (forthcoming). Generi testuali argomentativi e traduzione in prospettiva storica: qualche osservazione sulla base delle informazioni fornite dalla Saarbrucker Ûbersetzungsbibliographie a proposito delle traduzioni dal francese, dall'italiano e dallo spagnolo in tedesco. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Christina Becker (forthcoming). Dinamizar, impulsar-élargissement, approfondissement: Zum Zusammenhang zwischen konzeptuellen Metaphern und Argumentation am Beispiel politischer Sprachverwendung in Spanien und Frankreich. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ana Lûcia Tinoco Cabrai (forthcoming). L'emploi de Portante (Donc) Dans des Textes Écrits En Portugais du Brésil Ana Lûcia Tinoco Cabrai (Sâo Paulo). Argumentation.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Marion Carel (forthcoming). L'ambivalence argumentative: sous-détermination des énoncés par les phrases. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Sivan Cohen-Wiesenfeld (forthcoming). Argumentation logique et subjectivité masquée: le cas de la note diplomatique. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Peter Cramer (forthcoming). Story Problems: Where Do the Agonists of the Dialogue Model of Argument Interact? Argumentation:1-16.
    When discussing dialogue, argumentation researchers rarely draw the distinction between the story world and interactional world. While mediators often help to shape the interactions among agonists in the emerging flow of spoken discourse, writers of postulated dialogues narrate them, constructing a story world that depicts the agonists, depicts their utterances and their circumstances. In this paper, I ask where the agonists of the dialogue model of argument interact, and I show that they often interact in the story world of postulated (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Carolyn Cusick & Mark Peter (forthcoming). The Last Straw Fallacy: Another Causal Fallacy and Its Harmful Effects. Argumentation:1-18.
    We have noticed a pattern of arguments that exhibit a type of irrationality or a particular informal logical fallacy that is not fully captured by any existing fallacy. This fallacy can be explored through three examples where one misattributes a cause by focusing on a smaller portion of a larger set—specifically, the last or least known—and claiming that that cause holds a unique priority over other contributing factors for the occurrence of an event. We propose to call this fallacy the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Giovanni Damele (forthcoming). Rhetoric and Persuasive Strategies in High Courts' Decisions: Some Remarks on the Recent Decisions of the Portuguese Tribunal Constitutional and the Italian Corte Costituzionale on Same-Sex Marriage. Argumentation.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (forthcoming). Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Rational Disagreement. Argumentation.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. F. H. Van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser (forthcoming). Argumentation, Interpretation, Rhetoric. Argumentation.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jeanne Fahnestock (forthcoming). Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation: Selected Essays by David Zarefsky. Argumentation:1-5.
    The editors of the “Argumentation Library” have done students of argument worldwide a great favor in assembling and publishing this collection of essays by David Zarefsky, The twenty essays, which originally appeared as journal articles, book chapters, and invited presentations, span 30 years, the earliest from 1979 and the latest from 2012. Their selection and grouping reflect Zarefsky’s choices, and the resulting anthology provides readers, whether students new to argumentation studies or established scholars, with valuable theoretical perspectives as well as (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Emily Friedrich (forthcoming). The Toulmin Brief. Argumentation.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Anca Gâjà (forthcoming). La dissociation argumentative: composantes, mise en discours et ajustement stratégique. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Dale Hample & Amanda L. Irions (forthcoming). Arguing to Display Identity. Argumentation:1-28.
    A rarely studied motive for engaging in face-to-face arguing is to display one’s identity. One way people can manage their impressions is to give reasons for their commitments. This appears to be the first study to focus on this reason for arguing. 461 undergraduates recalled an episode in which they had argued to display own identity. They filled out trait measures as well as instruments describing the episode. Identity display arguments do not require controversy, are not very emotional episodes, can (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Lukáš Hlouch (forthcoming). Models of Legal Reasoning: An Attempt of a Practical View. Argumentation.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Ralph H. Johnson & Benjamin Hamby (forthcoming). A Meta-Level Approach to the Problem of Defining ‘Critical Thinking. Argumentation:1-14.
    The problem of defining ‘critical thinking’ needs a fresh approach. When one takes into consideration the sheer quantity of definitions and their obvious differences, an onlooker might be tempted to conclude that there is no inherent meaning to the term: that each author seems to consider that he or she is free to offer a definition that suits them. And, with a few exceptions, there has not been much discussion among proposers about the strength and weaknesses of the attempted definitions. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Constanza Ihnen Jory (forthcoming). Negotiation and Deliberation: Grasping the Difference. Argumentation:1-21.
    Negotiation and deliberation are two context types or genres of discourse widely studied in the argumentation literature. Within the pragma-dialectical framework, they have been characterised in terms of the conventions constraining the use of argumentative discourse in each of them. Thanks to these descriptions, it has become possible to analyse the arguers’ strategic manoeuvres and carry out more systematic, context-sensitive evaluations of argumentative discussions. However, one issue that still must be addressed in the pragma-dialectical theory—and other contextual approaches to argumentation—is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Harm Kloosterhuis (forthcoming). Henrique Jales Ribeiro : Systemic Approaches to Argument by Analogy. Argumentation:1-4.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Thorn-R. Kray (forthcoming). On Name-Dropping: The Mechanisms Behind a Notorious Practice in Social Science and the Humanities. Argumentation:1-19.
    The present essay discusses a notorious rhetoric means familiar to all scholars in the social sciences and humanities including philosophy: name-dropping. Defined as the excessive over-use of authoritative names, I argue that it is a pernicious practice leading to collective disorientation in spoken discourse. First, I discuss name-dropping in terms of informal logic as an ad verecundiam-type fallacy. Insofar this perspective proves to lack contextual sensitivity, name-dropping is portrayed in Goffman’s terms as a more general social practice. By narrowing down (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Martin Kusch & H. Schroder (forthcoming). Text, Interpretation. Argumentation.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Fabrizio Macagno & Alessandro Capone (forthcoming). Interpretative Disputes, Explicatures, and Argumentative Reasoning. Argumentation:1-24.
    The problem of establishing the best interpretation of a speech act is of fundamental importance in argumentation and communication in general. A party in a dialogue can interpret another’s or his own speech acts in the most convenient ways to achieve his dialogical goals. In defamation law this phenomenon becomes particularly important, as the dialogical effects of a communicative move may result in legal consequences. The purpose of this paper is to combine the instruments provided by argumentation theory with the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Christian Plantin (forthcoming). Laissez dire: La norme du discours de l'un est dans le discours de l'autre Christian Plantin (Lyon). Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Anika Schiemann (forthcoming). Adverbial indizierte Implikationen: eine argumentationsbasierte Analyse von persinolperfino. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Laura Sergo (forthcoming). La funzione argomentativa del connettore infatti in testi scientifici e divulgativi. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Justine Simon (forthcoming). Stratégies de Négociation Politique Et de Représentation du Discours d'Autrui Dans la Presse Adressée aux Jeunes. Argumentation.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Takeshi Suzuki (forthcoming). The 3rd Tokyo Conference on Argumentation. Argumentation.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Judith Visser (forthcoming). Formation de mots et persuasion: Le discours de l'extrême droite française. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Jean H. M. Wagemans (forthcoming). Review of J. Crosswhite, Deep Rhetoric: Philosophy, Reason, Violence, Justice, Wisdom. [REVIEW] Argumentation:1-5.
    Recent scholarship in the field of argumentation theory has shown an increasing interest in rethinking the relation between dialectic and rhetoric. In the debate concerning this issue, some scholars take the position of ‘isolationists’. They think that fundamental differences exist between the two disciplines and that it is impossible to translate insights developed within the one discipline in terms of the other. Other scholars can be characterized as ‘combinationalists’. They take the position that insights from dialectic and rhetoric can be (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. John Woods (forthcoming). John Locke. Argumentation.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. A. D. Wright & C. P. Butterfield (forthcoming). The NREL Teetering Hub Rotor Code: Final Results and Conclusions. Argumentation.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
 Previous issues
  
Next issues