Social Epistemology 23 (2):165 – 176 (2009)
|Abstract||In recent decades there has been increasing demand for and considerable efforts to conduct cross-disciplinary research. However, assessment of research quality in such endeavours still is often based on mono-disciplinary criteria and not seldom carried out by reviewers without strong cross-disciplinary experience. The authors suggest a two-pronged approach to cross-disciplinary research evaluation. One part should comprise an individual review of all the disciplines involved based on their mono-disciplinary sets of criteria. The other part should be a separate evaluation of the cross-disciplinary aspects based on the review of “problem formulation”, “integration and scope of the disciplines”, “parts and the whole”, “practical managerial aspects” and “the applied aspects” (when relevant). The pros and cons of implementing this approach in a stepwise manner or simultaneously is discussed. It is suggested that funding agencies develop more fair sets of review procedures for cross-disciplinary research and show willingness to allocate extra funds and time to such forms of research that sometimes are regarded as relatively more “risky” than conventional mono-disciplinary types|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kate Rousmaniere, Kari Dehli & Ning De Coninck-Smith (eds.) (1997). Discipline, Moral Regulation, and Schooling: A Social History. Garland Pub..
Lorraine Y. Landry (1999). Multi-Disciplinary Competence Assessment: A Case Study in Consensus and Culture. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (5):423-437.
Sandra H. Johnson (1985). Computer-Assisted Research Into Cross-Disciplinary Subjects. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 13 (3):122-123.
Drozdstoj Stoyanov, Peter Machamer & Kenneth Schaffner, In Quest for Scientific Psychiatry: Towards Bridging the Explanatory Gap.
William P. Bechtel (1987). Psycholinguistics as a Case of Cross-Disciplinary Research. Synthese 72 (September):293-311.
William Bechtel (1987). Psycholinguistics as a Case of Cross-Disciplinary Research: Symposium Introduction. Synthese 72 (3):293 - 311.
Patrick Carmichael (2011). Tribes, Territories and Threshold Concepts: Educational Materialisms at Work in Higher Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (s1):31-42.
Myra H. Strober (2006). Habits of the Mind: Challenges for Multidisciplinary Engagement. Social Epistemology 20 (3 & 4):315 – 331.
Jens Aagaard-Hansen (2007). The Challenges of Cross-Disciplinary Research. Social Epistemology 21 (4):425 – 438.
Uno Svedin & Jens Aagaard-Hansen (forthcoming). Quality Issues in Cross-Disciplinary Research: Towards a Two-Pronged Approach to Evaluation. Social Epistemology 23 (2):165-176.
Added to index2010-05-07
Total downloads8 ( #131,711 of 722,870 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,870 )
How can I increase my downloads?