Coetzee and alternative animal ethics

In Peter Singer & Anton Leist (eds.), J.M. Coetzee and Ethics. Columbia University Press (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Animal ethics has become a valuable part of philosophy. The main elements include criticism of anthropocentric assumptions and emphasis on experientialism. The analytic approach, which has applied standard moral theories to other animals, has been accompanied by the postmodern approach, which emphasizes matters such as plurality and contextuality. This is where J. M. Coetzee becomes relevant. His novels present ethical views related to nonhuman animals, constantly underpinned by the issue of how to communicate such views to others. On a more concrete level, the novels are a form of persuasion in themselves.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Personhood and Animals.Elisa Aaltola - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (2):175-193.
Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness.Kelly Oliver - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Animal rights: moral theory and practice.Mark Rowlands - 2009 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Do Animal Have Interests Worthy of Our Moral Interest?Peter Miller - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (4):319-333.
Attitudes to animals: views in animal welfare.Francine L. Dolins (ed.) - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-07-21

Downloads
8 (#1,291,989)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Humanism, Anti-Humanism, and Nonhuman Animals.Simon Coghlan - 2016 - Society and Animals 24 (4):403-419.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references